Define Variables logo

Define Variables

Organization
Aperivue
define-variables

Use when exposure, outcome, covariate or eligibility definitions and cutoffs need a citable basis before the protocol. Reads the data dictionary first, then maps each variable to a guideline or published definition and the database columns in a citation-backed table.

Overview

PublisherAperivue
Repositorymedsci-skills
Skill namedefine-variables
Stars
349
Forks
82
Bundled files
3
LicenseMIT
Links
  • Markdown instructions

    A SKILL.md file the model loads on demand, so it only costs tokens when a request actually matches.

  • Works with any LLM

    AI skills are plain Markdown, not provider-specific code, so this works with GPT, Claude, Gemini, Grok, or a local model.

  • 3 bundled files

    Scripts, templates, and references the model can read while it works. Files are read-only and never executed.

  • Open source

    Published by Aperivue on GitHub. Read the source before you install it.

Installation

Install the Define Variables AI skill in TypingMind to use it with any LLM, or drop it into another agent that reads SKILL.md.

1

Install in TypingMind

TypingMind installs a skill straight from its GitHub folder — it reads SKILL.md, bundles the resource files, and stores the result locally.

  1. Open the app and go to Plugins → Skills.
  2. Choose "Install from GitHub".
  3. Paste the skill folder URL below and confirm.
    https://github.com/Aperivue/medsci-skills/tree/main/skills/define-variables
  4. Enable the skill in any chat where you want it available.
Plugins → Skills → Add skill → From GitHub URL, then paste the folder URL and press Continue.
2

Install in another agent

Any agent that reads the Agent Skills format can use this skill — copy the folder into that agent's skills directory.

Claude Code — .claude/skills
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/Aperivue/medsci-skills.git /tmp/medsci-skills
mkdir -p .claude/skills
cp -r /tmp/medsci-skills/skills/define-variables .claude/skills/define-variables
Restart Claude Code after copying so it picks up the new skill.

Use it in TypingMind

Enable Define Variables in any TypingMind chat and the model takes it from there. Its name and description sit in the system prompt, and the moment a request matches, the model loads the full instructions itself — you never invoke it by hand, and it costs no tokens until it is actually used.

The model loads Define Variables on its own as soon as a request matches it.

Works with any AI model

AI skills are plain Markdown instructions rather than provider-specific code, so Define Variables is not tied to the model it was written for. Install it once in TypingMind and use it with GPT-5, Claude, Gemini, Grok, DeepSeek, Mistral, Llama, or a local model you run yourself — all on your own API keys.

  • Loaded only when it is needed

    The system prompt carries just the name and description. The instructions are fetched on the first matching request, so an idle skill costs nothing.

  • Switch models mid-chat

    Because the skill is instructions rather than code, changing model does not break it — the next model reads the same SKILL.md.

Skill instructions

This is the SKILL.md content the model loads. Read it before installing — a skill is instructions your model will follow.

Define-Variables Skill

Map each exposure, outcome, covariate, and eligibility variable to a canonical guideline/consensus definition, cross-check it against prior operationalizations in comparable cohorts, then map it to the available DB variables. Call after /design-study (and /search-lit), before /write-protocol.

Inputs

  1. Research question (one sentence)
  2. Candidate variables — exposure, outcome, key covariates, eligibility filters
  3. Data dictionary path (xlsx / csv / markdown) OR explicit list of available DB columns
  4. Cohort type (e.g., health-screening, NHANES-like, claims, registry) — informs which prior-art cohort to compare against

Missing inputs → ask once, then proceed.

4-Tier Pipeline (DB codebook + token-efficient literature)

Tier 0 — DB codebook lookup (mandatory for DB-backed observational studies)

Trigger: project has a project.yaml::db.dictionary_path field pointing to a machine-readable codebook (xlsx/csv/markdown), OR the user supplied a dictionary path in inputs. If neither, skip to Tier 1.

For every candidate DB variable — before touching literature — open the dictionary and record, verbatim, the sheet name, row number, and code→meaning mapping. This prevents the most common observational-study error: assuming a column code (status == 0, grade == 4) means what it intuitively reads like, when the codebook says otherwise.

Per variable:

  1. Locate the variable in the dictionary by exact column name.
  2. Copy verbatim: the sheet title, row number, and full code→meaning mapping (or unit/range statement for continuous vars).
  3. Paste into the Dict. sheet & row + Dict. verbatim columns of the operationalization table.
  4. If the variable is not found, OR the codebook is silent on a specific code value, file a question to the DB owner / data steward. Do NOT infer from cross-tabs, do NOT guess, do NOT proceed with that variable until a verbatim answer exists.

Empirical checks (value distributions, cross-tabs with related columns) are useful for sanity testing after the verbatim codebook meaning is recorded — never as a substitute for it.

Recommend committing a DICTIONARY_FIRST_POLICY.md at the project root (or shared-config path) with the canonical dictionary path and the escalation contact.

Exit gate: before Tier 1, cross-check every row's Dict. sheet & row and Dict. verbatim against the source dictionary; no DB-backed row may be left blank.

Tier 1 — Canonical index lookup (no API calls)

Look the variable up in references/common_definitions.md (hepatology, metabolic/endocrine, renal, pulmonary, cardiovascular, oncology/imaging incidentalomas, alcohol exposure). On a hit, record the guideline, year, canonical cutoff, and BibTeX key. Done — no /search-lit call.

Tier 2 — Targeted /search-lit (focused queries only)

For variables NOT in Tier 1, OR when subgroup justification is needed (Asian-specific cutoff, pediatric, young-adult, pregnancy, etc.), call /search-lit with one query per variable — never a general sweep, which buries the signal. Query pattern:

"{construct} definition {cohort type} {subgroup qualifier}"
e.g., "obstructive sleep apnea prevalence Korean health screening cohort"

Stop searching a variable once the first 1-2 papers converge on the same definition. If more than five variables need Tier 2, list them and confirm with the user before running the rest.

Tier 3 — Verification

Every definition, cutoff, and era anchor must come from a verified source — a clinical guideline, a peer-reviewed paper with DOI, or an established registry data dictionary. Never take a phenotype threshold from the model's prior or a reference from memory. Before finalizing, run /verify-refs on the accumulated BibTeX to confirm every citation exists in PubMed/CrossRef. A choice with no canonical source is flagged Ad-hoc: yes, justified in 1-2 sentences, and confirmed by the user before it propagates into /write-protocol or /analyze-stats.

Output Template

Write {project_root}/variable_operationalization.md (or the path the user specifies) from templates/variable_operationalization.md. Required structure:

  1. Header: research question, cohort type, date, author

  2. Operationalization table — one row per variable:

    | Variable | Role | Dict. sheet & row | Dict. verbatim | Canonical source | Definition | Cutoff | DB vars | Implementation | Ad-hoc? |

    • Role: exposure / outcome / covariate / eligibility
    • Dict. sheet & row: e.g. 5-1.복부초음파 r12 — mandatory if a DB dictionary exists
    • Dict. verbatim: full code→meaning string copied from the dictionary — mandatory under the same condition
    • Canonical source: BibTeX key (e.g., @rinella2023_aasld_masld), so downstream skills can re-verify
    • Definition: one line, verbatim from the guideline where possible
    • Cutoff: numeric + units
    • DB vars: exact dictionary column names used
    • Implementation: SQL/pandas-style pseudocode (e.g., bmi>=25 & (b_tg>=150 | b_hdl<40))
    • Ad-hoc?: yes/no. If yes, justification below the table
  3. Ad-hoc justifications — for each yes row

  4. Mapping gaps — variables in the protocol with no DB equivalent; list proxy / omit / request decisions

  5. References — BibTeX block

Out of scope: statistical analysis → /analyze-stats; manuscript drafting → /write-paper; data cleaning / missingness → /clean-data; sample size → /calc-sample-size.

Failure Modes to Avoid

  1. Column-first framing — starting from what columns exist, then picking a definition that matches. Always flip: definition first, then map. Tier 0 still applies once a column is picked: quote its codebook entry verbatim before using its values.
  2. Cutoff drift — using a different cutoff than the cited guideline without justification (e.g., BMI≥23 cited as WHO Asian while text says ≥25).
  3. Mixing eras — 2020 MAFLD criteria with 2023 MASLD criteria in the same analysis. Pick one and note why.
  4. Dose/duration structural-missingness — operationalizing a dose/duration covariate (pack-years, cessation-years, alcohol grams/week) anchored to a categorical exposure (smoking status, alcohol use) without specifying what the reference level (never-smoker, never-drinker) does to the dose. A never-smoker's pack-years is a structural zero, not a missing value; conflating the two collapses the analytic sample under complete-case modeling and lets MICE fabricate a non-zero dose for the unexposed. Operationalize it explicitly — add a row with Role = covariate and Implementation = "IF status == 'never' THEN dose = 0 ELSE measured_value" — and adjust on the categorical status variable, reserving the continuous dose for an exposed-only secondary analysis. /clean-data (categorical-implied-zero flag) and /analyze-stats ("Covariate Pitfalls") enforce this downstream.

Bundled files

The model reads these on demand while the skill is loaded. They are exposed as readable files and are never executed.

Frequently asked questions

What does the Define Variables AI skill do?

Use when exposure, outcome, covariate or eligibility definitions and cutoffs need a citable basis before the protocol. Reads the data dictionary first, then maps each variable to a guideline or published definition and the database columns in a citation-backed table.

Why use Define Variables on TypingMind?

Because you install it once and use it with any model. Define Variables is plain Markdown rather than provider-specific code, so the same skill runs on GPT-5, Claude, Gemini, Grok, or a local model — and you can switch model mid-chat without it breaking. TypingMind runs on your own API keys, so you pay providers directly instead of a per-seat subscription, and your skills and chats stay in your own storage.

How do I install Define Variables in TypingMind?

Open Plugins → Skills → Install from GitHub in TypingMind and paste https://github.com/Aperivue/medsci-skills/tree/main/skills/define-variables. TypingMind reads its SKILL.md and bundles its files and installs it as a skill you can enable per chat.

Which AI models can use Define Variables?

Any model you connect in TypingMind. AI skills are plain Markdown instructions rather than provider-specific code, so GPT, Claude, Gemini, Grok, and local models can all load this skill when a request matches it.

How many AI models can I use with Define Variables?

As many as you like. As long as a model supports skills, you can use Define Variables with it — GPT, Claude, Gemini, Grok, DeepSeek, Mistral, Llama and more — all on TypingMind with your own API keys.

Is the Define Variables AI skill free?

Yes. It is published on GitHub by Aperivue under the MIT license. You only pay your own AI provider for the tokens you use.

What are AI skills?

An AI skill is a reusable instruction bundle that teaches an AI model how to do one specific task. It follows the open Agent Skills format: a SKILL.md file with a name and description, plus any scripts, templates or reference files the model may need. The model reads the instructions only when your request matches the skill, so an installed skill costs nothing until it is used.

How are AI skills different from plugins or MCP servers?

A plugin or MCP server gives a model new tools to call — code that runs somewhere and returns a result. An AI skill gives the model knowledge and process instead: how to approach a task, which steps to follow, what good output looks like. Skills are plain Markdown, so they need no server, no API key and no runtime, and they work with any model.

View all

Set up your own AI workspace now

Get notified about new features and future giveaways by subscribing to our newsletter 👇