Technical Debt logo

Technical Debt

Community
AsyrafHussin
technical-debt

Technical debt inventory, prioritization, and audit for PHP/Laravel (MySQL) and Node/TypeScript/React projects. Use when assessing code health, identifying refactoring candidates, planning debt paydown, or auditing a codebase for accumulated debt. Triggers on "audit technical debt", "find tech debt", "debt inventory", "what should we refactor first", or tasks involving code health, security debt, performance debt, data debt, observability debt, debt prioritization, or remediation planning.

Overview

PublisherAsyrafHussin
Repositoryagent-skills
Skill nametechnical-debt
Stars
78
Forks
10
Bundled files
46
LicenseMIT
Links
  • Markdown instructions

    A SKILL.md file the model loads on demand, so it only costs tokens when a request actually matches.

  • Works with any LLM

    AI skills are plain Markdown, not provider-specific code, so this works with GPT, Claude, Gemini, Grok, or a local model.

  • 46 bundled files

    Scripts, templates, and references the model can read while it works. Files are read-only and never executed.

  • Open source

    Published by AsyrafHussin on GitHub. Read the source before you install it.

Installation

Install the Technical Debt AI skill in TypingMind to use it with any LLM, or drop it into another agent that reads SKILL.md.

1

Install in TypingMind

TypingMind installs a skill straight from its GitHub folder — it reads SKILL.md, bundles the resource files, and stores the result locally.

  1. Open the app and go to Plugins → Skills.
  2. Choose "Install from GitHub".
  3. Paste the skill folder URL below and confirm.
  4. Enable the skill in any chat where you want it available.
Plugins → Skills → Add skill → From GitHub URL, then paste the folder URL and press Continue.
2

Install in another agent

Any agent that reads the Agent Skills format can use this skill — copy the folder into that agent's skills directory.

Claude Code — .claude/skills
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/AsyrafHussin/agent-skills.git /tmp/agent-skills
mkdir -p .claude/skills
cp -r /tmp/agent-skills/skills/technical-debt .claude/skills/technical-debt
Restart Claude Code after copying so it picks up the new skill.

Use it in TypingMind

Enable Technical Debt in any TypingMind chat and the model takes it from there. Its name and description sit in the system prompt, and the moment a request matches, the model loads the full instructions itself — you never invoke it by hand, and it costs no tokens until it is actually used.

The model loads Technical Debt on its own as soon as a request matches it.

Works with any AI model

AI skills are plain Markdown instructions rather than provider-specific code, so Technical Debt is not tied to the model it was written for. Install it once in TypingMind and use it with GPT-5, Claude, Gemini, Grok, DeepSeek, Mistral, Llama, or a local model you run yourself — all on your own API keys.

  • Loaded only when it is needed

    The system prompt carries just the name and description. The instructions are fetched on the first matching request, so an idle skill costs nothing.

  • Switch models mid-chat

    Because the skill is instructions rather than code, changing model does not break it — the next model reads the same SKILL.md.

Skill instructions

This is the SKILL.md content the model loads. Read it before installing — a skill is instructions your model will follow.

Technical Debt

Technical debt audit and prioritization framework for PHP/Laravel (MySQL) and Node/TypeScript/React projects. Contains 42 rules across 10 categories covering code, security, design, dependency, test, performance, data, documentation, infrastructure, and process debt. Produces a ranked ledger (effort × impact) so teams know what to fix first, not just what's broken. Supports both coding reference and audit mode with PASS/FAIL/N/A output.

Metadata

  • Version: 1.0.0
  • Scope: PHP / Laravel (MySQL) + Node / TypeScript / React
  • Rule Count: 42 rules across 10 categories
  • License: MIT

How to Audit

When the user asks to "audit technical debt", "find tech debt", or "what should we refactor first" — run the checklist below against their codebase and produce a ranked debt ledger.

Audit Step 1: Determine Scope

  • If arguments provided ($ARGUMENTS): audit only those paths or modules
  • If no arguments: audit the entire repository starting from the root

Audit Step 2: Detect Project Stack

Inspect composer.json and package.json to determine which of the supported stacks (PHP/Laravel, Node/TypeScript/React, or both) is in use. Tooling commands (composer outdated, npm outdated, phpstan, eslint, knip, etc.) are chosen based on this detection.

Audit Step 3: Run Debt Checklist

Work through every item below. For each, output:

  • PASS — brief confirmation of what was verified
  • FAIL — exact file:line (or command output), description of the debt, effort estimate (S/M/L), and impact (LOW/MED/HIGH/CRITICAL)
  • N/A — if the check does not apply to this project
Code Debt
  • No duplicated blocks > 30 lines across files
  • No function exceeds 50 lines or cyclomatic complexity > 10
  • No class exceeds 300 lines or has > 15 public methods (god class)
  • No unreachable code, unused exports, or commented-out blocks left in source
  • No magic numbers or unexplained string literals in business logic
  • No function exceeds 4 parameters (use a parameter object)
Security Debt
  • No secrets, API keys, or credentials committed to source (or git history)
  • Every public endpoint validates input via a schema / FormRequest / DTO
  • Passwords hashed with bcrypt or argon2id; no MD5/SHA-1
  • Sessions have a bounded lifetime; auth-sensitive endpoints rate-limited
  • Security headers present (CSP, HSTS, X-Content-Type-Options, Referrer-Policy)
  • Authorization (not just authentication) enforced on every protected route
Design Debt
  • No circular dependencies between modules/packages
  • Layers respect direction (UI → service → repository, never reversed)
  • No "shotgun surgery" patterns (one change forcing edits in 5+ files)
  • Abstractions hide implementation details (no leaking framework types across boundaries)
Dependency Debt
  • No dependencies more than 2 major versions behind
  • No abandoned/unmaintained packages (no release in > 24 months)
  • No known CVEs reported by npm audit / composer audit at HIGH or CRITICAL
  • No unused dependencies in package.json / composer.json
Test Debt
  • Critical paths have integration test coverage
  • No skipped/disabled tests without linked issue or removal date
  • No known flaky tests left in main branch
  • Test suite runs in under 10 minutes (or has explicit budget documented)
Performance Debt
  • No N+1 query patterns on list endpoints (query count constant per request)
  • No list endpoint returns an unbounded result set (pagination present)
  • Frontend initial bundle within budget (~200 KB gzip); route-level code splitting in place
  • Expensive read paths (aggregations, external APIs, static configs) are cached at a sensible layer
Data Debt
  • Migrations are the only source of schema changes; production matches migration history
  • All foreign-key and frequently-queried columns are indexed
  • No orphaned child records; FK constraints enforced
Documentation Debt
  • README reflects current setup and dev workflow
  • No stale comments contradicting the code they describe
  • Public APIs / exported modules have docblocks or type hints
Infrastructure Debt
  • Runtime versions (Node, PHP) are on supported (non-EOL) releases
  • No deprecated framework APIs in use (e.g., Laravel Route::get() deprecations)
  • Build runs cleanly with zero warnings
  • Secrets stored in a manager (Vault / Doppler / cloud SM); no long-lived shared credentials
  • Structured logs, error tracking, p95 latency dashboards, and SLO-based alerts in place
Process Debt
  • No TODO/FIXME/HACK comments older than 6 months without owner or ticket
  • No @deprecated markers without a removal date or replacement
  • Debt is tracked somewhere visible (issue tracker label, debt register, ADR)
  • Every path has an owner (CODEOWNERS file present and current)
  • No feature flags at 100% rollout for more than 6 weeks without a removal plan

Audit Step 4: Build the Debt Ledger

End the audit with a prioritized table:

## Technical Debt Ledger

| # | Category | Item | File / Location | Effort | Impact | Priority |
|---|----------|------|-----------------|--------|--------|----------|
| 1 | deps | jQuery 1.12 (8y old, 3 CVEs) | package.json:14 | L | CRITICAL | P0 |
| 2 | code | OrderService god class (820 lines) | app/Services/OrderService.php | M | HIGH | P1 |
| 3 | test | 12 disabled tests in auth/ | tests/Feature/Auth/* | S | HIGH | P1 |
...

## Summary
- **PASS:** X checks
- **FAIL:** Y checks
- **N/A:** Z checks
- **Top 3 to pay down first:** (list highest-priority items with rationale)

Priority formula: P0 = CRITICAL impact, P1 = HIGH impact, P2 = MED, P3 = LOW. Within a priority, sort by ascending effort (cheap wins first).

Effort scale:

  • S = under a day
  • M = 1–5 days
  • L = more than a week (likely needs to be broken down)

When to Apply

Reference these guidelines when:

  • Running a tech-debt audit on a codebase
  • Planning a refactoring sprint or debt-paydown initiative
  • Reviewing a PR that introduces shortcuts (and deciding whether to accept them)
  • Building a debt register or backlog category in your issue tracker
  • Justifying engineering investment to non-engineering stakeholders
  • Onboarding to a new codebase and assessing its health
  • Writing an ADR (architecture decision record) for a debt-related decision

Step 1: Detect Project Stack

Always detect the stack before running tooling. This skill targets PHP / Laravel (with MySQL) and Node / TypeScript / React projects; detection commands below assume one or both are present.

SignalStackTooling
composer.json presentPHP / Laravelcomposer outdated, composer audit, phpstan, phpcs, phpmd, deptrac
package.json presentNode / JS / TS / Reactnpm outdated, npm audit, eslint, tsc --noEmit, knip, madge
MySQL connection availableDatabaseEXPLAIN, sys.schema_tables_with_full_table_scans, sys.schema_unused_indexes, sys.statement_analysis
any repoSecrets scangitleaks git, trufflehog

If both stacks are present (e.g., Laravel + Inertia + React), run audits for each.

Rule Categories by Priority

PriorityCategoryImpactPrefix
1Code DebtCRITICALcode-
2Security DebtCRITICALsecurity-
3Design DebtHIGHdesign-
4Dependency DebtHIGHdeps-
5Test DebtHIGHtest-
6Performance DebtHIGHperf-
7Data DebtHIGHdata-
8Documentation DebtMEDIUMdocs-
9Infrastructure DebtMEDIUMinfra-
10Process DebtMEDIUMprocess-

Quick Reference

1. Code Debt (CRITICAL)

  • code-duplication — Detect and consolidate duplicated logic
  • code-complexity — Cyclomatic and cognitive complexity thresholds
  • code-long-functions — Function and method length limits
  • code-god-classes — Class size and responsibility limits
  • code-dead-code — Unused code, unreachable branches, commented blocks
  • code-magic-numbers — Hardcoded literals in business logic
  • code-long-parameter-lists — Functions with too many positional params

2. Security Debt (CRITICAL)

  • security-secrets-in-code — API keys, passwords, tokens in source / history
  • security-input-validation — Endpoints accepting untrusted input without schemas
  • security-auth-hardening — Outdated auth, missing MFA, missing security headers

3. Design Debt (HIGH)

  • design-tight-coupling — Excessive direct dependencies between modules
  • design-circular-deps — Cyclic imports / requires
  • design-leaky-abstractions — Framework types crossing layer boundaries
  • design-shotgun-surgery — Changes that touch many files at once

4. Dependency Debt (HIGH)

  • deps-outdated-versions — Major versions behind on dependencies
  • deps-abandoned-packages — Unmaintained / abandoned libraries
  • deps-security-advisories — Known CVEs in installed dependencies
  • deps-unused-deps — Declared but unused packages

5. Test Debt (HIGH)

  • test-coverage-gaps — Critical paths without tests
  • test-flaky-tests — Tests with non-deterministic outcomes
  • test-disabled-tests — Skipped tests left in the suite
  • test-slow-tests — Tests blocking fast feedback

6. Performance Debt (HIGH)

  • perf-n-plus-one — Linear request → quadratic database load
  • perf-missing-pagination — Unbounded result sets
  • perf-bundle-bloat — Heavy / unsplit frontend bundles
  • perf-no-caching — Missing cache layers on read-heavy paths

7. Data Debt (HIGH)

  • data-schema-drift — Production schema diverges from migrations
  • data-missing-indexes — Hot queries doing sequential scans
  • data-orphaned-records — Referential integrity gaps

8. Documentation Debt (MEDIUM)

  • docs-stale-comments — Comments contradicting current behavior
  • docs-outdated-architecture — README/architecture docs out of date
  • docs-undocumented-api — Public APIs without docblocks or types

9. Infrastructure Debt (MEDIUM)

  • infra-runtime-versions — EOL or near-EOL language/runtime versions
  • infra-deprecated-apis — Framework deprecations still in use
  • infra-build-warnings — Build/compile warnings ignored
  • infra-secrets-management — Long-lived credentials, plain env files, leaked logs
  • infra-monitoring-gaps — Missing logs, metrics, traces, alerts, or SLOs

10. Process Debt (MEDIUM)

  • process-todo-fixme-aging — Aging TODO/FIXME/HACK comments
  • process-deprecated-markers@deprecated without removal plan
  • process-debt-tracking — Debt visible in a register / backlog
  • process-ownership-gaps — Code without an owning team (CODEOWNERS)
  • process-feature-flags-lingering — Stale feature flags polluting code paths

Essential Patterns

Debt Ledger Output Format

| # | Category | Item                          | Location              | Effort | Impact   | Priority |
|---|----------|-------------------------------|-----------------------|--------|----------|----------|
| 1 | deps     | guzzle 6.x (5y behind)        | composer.json:18      | M      | HIGH     | P1       |
| 2 | code     | InvoiceService dup logic      | app/Services/Invoice* | S      | MEDIUM   | P2       |
| 3 | test     | 8 skipped tests in checkout/  | tests/Feature/Checkout| S      | HIGH     | P1       |

Effort × Impact Prioritization

              LOW       MEDIUM    HIGH      CRITICAL
S (<1d)   →   P3        P2        P1        P0
M (1-5d)  →   P3        P2        P1        P0
L (>1w)   →   P3        P3        P2        P1   (break down)

Cheap + high-impact items go first. Expensive items always get broken down before scheduling.

Tooling Cheatsheet

bash
# PHP / Laravel
composer outdated --direct          # list outdated direct deps
composer audit                      # known CVEs
vendor/bin/phpstan analyse          # static analysis
vendor/bin/phpmd app text cleancode # mess detector

# Node / TS
npm outdated                        # list outdated deps
npm audit                           # known CVEs
npx depcheck                        # unused deps
npx tsc --noEmit                    # type errors
npx eslint . --max-warnings 0       # lint warnings

# Cross-language
git log --since="6 months ago" --diff-filter=A -p | grep -E "TODO|FIXME|HACK"
cloc .                              # lines of code per language

How to Use

Read individual rule files for detailed explanations and code examples:

rules/code-duplication.md
rules/design-circular-deps.md
rules/deps-outdated-versions.md
rules/test-flaky-tests.md
rules/process-todo-fixme-aging.md

Each rule file contains:

  • YAML frontmatter with metadata (title, impact, tags)
  • Brief explanation of why it matters
  • How to detect (commands / patterns)
  • Incorrect example with explanation
  • Correct example or remediation strategy

References

Full Compiled Document

For the complete guide with all rules expanded: AGENTS.md

Bundled files

The model reads these on demand while the skill is loaded. They are exposed as readable files and are never executed.

Frequently asked questions

What does the Technical Debt AI skill do?

Technical debt inventory, prioritization, and audit for PHP/Laravel (MySQL) and Node/TypeScript/React projects. Use when assessing code health, identifying refactoring candidates, planning debt paydown, or auditing a codebase for accumulated debt. Triggers on "audit technical debt", "find tech debt", "debt inventory", "what should we refactor first", or tasks involving code health, security debt, performance debt, data debt, observability debt, debt prioritization, or remediation planning.

Why use Technical Debt on TypingMind?

Because you install it once and use it with any model. Technical Debt is plain Markdown rather than provider-specific code, so the same skill runs on GPT-5, Claude, Gemini, Grok, or a local model — and you can switch model mid-chat without it breaking. TypingMind runs on your own API keys, so you pay providers directly instead of a per-seat subscription, and your skills and chats stay in your own storage.

How do I install Technical Debt in TypingMind?

Open Plugins → Skills → Install from GitHub in TypingMind and paste https://github.com/AsyrafHussin/agent-skills/tree/main/skills/technical-debt. TypingMind reads its SKILL.md and bundles its files and installs it as a skill you can enable per chat.

Which AI models can use Technical Debt?

Any model you connect in TypingMind. AI skills are plain Markdown instructions rather than provider-specific code, so GPT, Claude, Gemini, Grok, and local models can all load this skill when a request matches it.

How many AI models can I use with Technical Debt?

As many as you like. As long as a model supports skills, you can use Technical Debt with it — GPT, Claude, Gemini, Grok, DeepSeek, Mistral, Llama and more — all on TypingMind with your own API keys.

Is the Technical Debt AI skill free?

Yes. It is published on GitHub by AsyrafHussin under the MIT license. You only pay your own AI provider for the tokens you use.

What are AI skills?

An AI skill is a reusable instruction bundle that teaches an AI model how to do one specific task. It follows the open Agent Skills format: a SKILL.md file with a name and description, plus any scripts, templates or reference files the model may need. The model reads the instructions only when your request matches the skill, so an installed skill costs nothing until it is used.

How are AI skills different from plugins or MCP servers?

A plugin or MCP server gives a model new tools to call — code that runs somewhere and returns a result. An AI skill gives the model knowledge and process instead: how to approach a task, which steps to follow, what good output looks like. Skills are plain Markdown, so they need no server, no API key and no runtime, and they work with any model.

View all

Set up your own AI workspace now

Get notified about new features and future giveaways by subscribing to our newsletter 👇