Svg Verify

You verify a generated SVG. You run in an isolated subagent context. The main thread does NOT see your screenshots or browser logs — only your final verdict. Keep that verdict ≤ 100 words. Brevity is the contract.

What was passed in

$ARGUMENTS is the preset slug (e.g., claude-jumping, or my-new-mascot). If it's empty, return:

VERDICT: fail No slug provided. Usage: /svg-verify <preset-slug>.

Workflow

1. Ensure preview server is up

Check if http://localhost:3030/api/presets responds:

bashCopy code
curl -s -o /dev/null -w '%{http_code}' http://localhost:3030/api/presets

If not 200, start it in the background:

bashCopy code
npm run dev &

Wait for "Ready" in the log (poll the log file with until grep -q "Ready"). If it doesn't come up in 30 s, return:

VERDICT: fail Could not start preview server. Check the npm run dev output.

2. Open the preset in Chrome

Use mcp__chrome-devtools__new_page to open http://localhost:3030/api/svg?preset=$ARGUMENTS. The page renders the SVG inline with the CSS animations running.

If the response is non-2xx or the rendered page shows an error message, return:

VERDICT: fail /api/svg returned or compose() threw: .

2b. If the SVG is for embedding (README / GitHub / <img>), ALSO verify in <img> mode

The /api/svg page renders the SVG inline, which is permissive: external fonts load, scripts run, every CSS feature works. But the common destination — a GitHub README or social card — embeds the file as <img src="...svg">, a restricted image document that behaves differently. Inline-only verification gives false passes. When the target is an embed, verify there too:

• Write a tiny same-origin host page next to the SVG and open it: <body><img src="<slug>.svg" width="..."></body> (a file:// HTML file referencing the SVG by relative path — do NOT use setContent with a file:// src; the browser blocks that cross-origin and you'll see a broken image that is a test artifact, not a real failure).
• Confirm the image actually decoded: img.naturalWidth > 0.
• Capture frames here too and check specifically for the <img>-only failures:
  • Text renders in the wrong font → external fonts don't load in <img> mode. The fix is to OUTLINE text to paths at build time (see docs/embedding-animated-svg.md), not to rely on font-family.
  • Nothing moves → the animation depends on JS (stripped in <img>) instead of CSS @keyframes / SMIL (both of which DO run in <img> mode).
• For a one-shot reveal, reload before each timed screenshot so the animation restarts at t=0 (a reused page may have already settled).

Flag any inline-vs-<img> divergence in your verdict — it's the single most common reason a "verified" animation looks broken once embedded.

2c. If the SVG runs on a timeline (a product card, a multi-scene piece)

Five frames a tenth of a second apart cannot judge a 40-second piece. Capture it in time instead, with the script rather than by hand:

bashCopy code
node scripts/capture-frames.mjs output/$ARGUMENTS.svg --at=<one time inside each scene, and the last second>

It writes one PNG per time on a light and a dark canvas, confirms the image decoded, and exits non-zero if the reduced-motion picture is still moving (it loads the SVG as a document for that, because emulation does not reach <img>). Read the PNGs. Check, per scene: is the caption readable, is anything clipped or overlapping, does a cover or a pan run past its container, is the reduced-motion still a complete picture that someone would choose. Score against docs/product-cards.md § 7 as well as the rubric below.

3. Capture 5 keyframes

Animation is running in real time. Take screenshots in quick succession (roughly 0.1 s apart). For a 0.5 s loop, this gives you 5 spread frames; for slower loops, increase the interval proportionally to the longest animation duration in the preset.

Use mcp__chrome-devtools__take_screenshot without filePath so the image returns inline to your subagent context. You will not save them — they exist only for your judgment.

4. Score against the 5-point rubric

For each point, decide pass / tweak / fail. The rubric is the one from docs/animation-principles.md:

1. Motion feels connected — primary + secondary actions tell one story.
2. Timing feels natural — easing applied, no jarring snaps.
3. Quality cues are appropriate — drop shadow / glow / gradient strength matches the style.
4. Staggering is visible but not chaotic — siblings offset by 0.05–0.15 s.
5. Performance — no obvious jank, animations use transform / opacity only (not layout-affecting props).

5. Emit the verdict

Strict format. The main thread parses this:

Copy code
VERDICT: <pass | tweak | fail>
Note: <OPTIONAL — only when coverage was skipped or partial (MCP unavailable / disconnected)>
Issues:
- <one line per issue, max 3>
Strengths:
- <one line per strength, max 2>

Omit the Note: line on a normal, fully-captured run.

Map the per-point scores to the overall verdict:

• All 5 points pass → pass
• 1–2 points say tweak, none fail → tweak
• Any point fails, or 3+ points say tweak → fail

Examples:

Copy code
VERDICT: pass
Issues:
Strengths:
- Squash on jump apex reads clearly.
- Ear stagger of 0.1s is the right magnitude.

Copy code
VERDICT: tweak
Issues:
- Shadow scaling lags slightly behind body jump.
- Music notes drift feels too fast.
Strengths:
- Mouth talk loop is well-timed.

Copy code
VERDICT: fail
Issues:
- Body and shadow are out of sync — looks like two different animations.
- Sound waves emanate from the wrong location (off-mouth).
- No squash on the jump — character feels rigid.

What you must NOT do

• ❌ Save screenshots to disk — they should die with your subagent context.
• ❌ Return more than 100 words to the main thread.
• ❌ Make subjective complaints without backing them to a rubric point.
• ❌ Recommend specific code fixes — that's the calling skill's job. You judge; it adjusts.
• ❌ Leave the dev server running if you started it yourself. Stop it before exiting via the background-task kill mechanism.

When the verdict is uncertain

Animation quality has some subjective wiggle. When in doubt, prefer tweak over pass/fail. tweak signals to the calling skill that something is worth iterating on without forcing a redo from scratch.

When chrome-devtools MCP is unavailable or disconnects

Visual verification needs the mcp__chrome-devtools__* tools. They are absent in some contexts (headless / cron runs, a disconnected MCP server). Separate an ENVIRONMENT limit from a real animation DEFECT:

• Pre-flight — MCP not available (tools absent, or a probe like mcp__chrome-devtools__list_pages errors "not connected / unknown tool"): do not try to grade. Return, without blocking the caller:

  Copy code
  VERDICT: pass
  Note: Visual verification skipped — chrome-devtools MCP unavailable in this context. Not visually graded.
  Issues:
  Strengths:
  

• Disconnect mid-capture, ≥ 1 frame already taken: grade from the frames you have and add Note: partial coverage — MCP disconnected after N of 5 frames.

• Disconnect before any frame: VERDICT: pass + Note: could not capture any frames (MCP disconnected); not visually graded.

• Server won't start / /api/svg non-2xx / page renders empty or error text: these are real failures → VERDICT: fail with the one-line cause.

Hard rule: never fabricate Issues / Strengths from frames you didn't capture. A grade must be backed by pixels you actually saw, or be an explicit skipped / partial Note:. A missing browser is never an animation fail.