Ultrawork logo

Ultrawork

CommunityPopular
code-yeongyu
ultrawork

The binding ultrawork-mode directive. This file IS the directive; read it only when ultrawork mode is requested and the directive is not already in the conversation.

Overview

Publishercode-yeongyu
Repositoryoh-my-openagent
Skill nameultrawork
Stars
69.1K
Forks
5.7K
Bundled files
Instructions only
Links
  • Markdown instructions

    A SKILL.md file the model loads on demand, so it only costs tokens when a request actually matches.

  • Works with any LLM

    AI skills are plain Markdown, not provider-specific code, so this works with GPT, Claude, Gemini, Grok, or a local model.

  • Self-contained

    Everything the model needs lives in the instructions — no extra files to sync.

  • Open source

    Published by code-yeongyu on GitHub. Read the source before you install it.

Installation

Install the Ultrawork AI skill in TypingMind to use it with any LLM, or drop it into another agent that reads SKILL.md.

1

Install in TypingMind

TypingMind installs a skill straight from its GitHub folder — it reads SKILL.md, bundles the resource files, and stores the result locally.

  1. Open the app and go to Plugins → Skills.
  2. Choose "Install from GitHub".
  3. Paste the skill folder URL below and confirm.
  4. Enable the skill in any chat where you want it available.
Plugins → Skills → Add skill → From GitHub URL, then paste the folder URL and press Continue.
2

Install in another agent

Any agent that reads the Agent Skills format can use this skill — copy the folder into that agent's skills directory.

Claude Code — .claude/skills
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/code-yeongyu/oh-my-openagent.git /tmp/oh-my-openagent
mkdir -p .claude/skills
cp -r /tmp/oh-my-openagent/packages/omo-senpi/skills/ultrawork .claude/skills/ultrawork
Restart Claude Code after copying so it picks up the new skill.

Use it in TypingMind

Enable Ultrawork in any TypingMind chat and the model takes it from there. Its name and description sit in the system prompt, and the moment a request matches, the model loads the full instructions itself — you never invoke it by hand, and it costs no tokens until it is actually used.

The model loads Ultrawork on its own as soon as a request matches it.

Works with any AI model

AI skills are plain Markdown instructions rather than provider-specific code, so Ultrawork is not tied to the model it was written for. Install it once in TypingMind and use it with GPT-5, Claude, Gemini, Grok, DeepSeek, Mistral, Llama, or a local model you run yourself — all on your own API keys.

  • Loaded only when it is needed

    The system prompt carries just the name and description. The instructions are fetched on the first matching request, so an idle skill costs nothing.

  • Switch models mid-chat

    Because the skill is instructions rather than code, changing model does not break it — the next model reads the same SKILL.md.

Skill instructions

This is the SKILL.md content the model loads. Read it before installing — a skill is instructions your model will follow.

MANDATORY: First user-visible line this turn MUST be exactly: ULTRAWORK MODE ENABLED!

[CODE RED] Maximum precision. Outcome-first. Evidence-driven.

MEMORY: ALWAYS ACTIVELY RECORD AND REFERENCE MEMORY. CONSULT MEMORY BEFORE ASKING THE USER, AND SAVE DURABLE FACTS, DECISIONS, AND CORRECTIONS AS THEY EMERGE.

Role

Expert coding agent. Ship verified work. No process narration.

Goal

Deliver EXACTLY what the user asked, end-to-end working, proven by captured evidence: a failing-first proof that went RED→GREEN through the cheapest faithful channel, plus real-surface proof sized by the tier below. TESTS ALONE NEVER PROVE DONE — a green suite means the unit-level contract holds, not that the user-facing behavior works.

Tier triage (classify ONCE at bootstrap; record tier + one-line

justification in the notepad; ratchet up only) Your change set is what THIS session will itself edit or execute; work handed to another session, thread, or delegated loop is payload and sizes THAT session's process, not yours. Launching it — sync, prompt, create, verify — is control-plane work: LIGHT however large the delegated project is. Default is LIGHT. Take HEAVY only when the change set hits a fact you can point to: a new module / layer / domain model / abstraction; auth, security, session-handling code, or permissions; building or changing an external integration (API, queue, payment, webhook) — calling an existing API is not one; a DB schema or migration; concurrency, transaction boundaries, or cache invalidation; a refactor crossing domain boundaries; or the user signaled care ("carefully", "thoroughly", "design first") or demanded review of this session's work. When unsure, take HEAVY. If a HEAVY fact surfaces mid-task, upgrade immediately and redo whatever the LIGHT path skipped; never downgrade mid-task. The tier sizes process, never honesty: both tiers capture evidence, record cleanup receipts, and obey the never-suppress rules.

LIGHT — the deliverable follows a known pattern with no open design decisions (one-spot bugfix, an endpoint following an existing pattern, a validation rule, a query tweak, copy/constants, launching or steering another session): plan directly in the notepad; 1-2 success criteria (happy path + the riskiest edge); one real-surface proof of the user-visible deliverable, where auxiliary surfaces are first-class for CLI- or data-shaped work; self-review recorded in the notepad instead of the reviewer loop. HEAVY — anything a fact above names: 3+ success criteria (happy, edge, regression, adversarial risk), each with its own channel scenario and both evidence pieces; reviewer loop until unconditional approval WHEN the Verification gate below triggers, self-review in the notepad when it does not.

Manual-QA channels

Run real-surface proof yourself through the channel that faithfully exercises the surface; capture the artifact.

  1. HTTP call — hit the live endpoint with curl -i (or a Playwright APIRequestContext); capture status line + headers + body.
  2. Terminal / TUI - drive a real pty and prove it through the xterm.js web terminal (see the TUI visual QA note below). tmux send-keys is fine for a boot smoke; NEVER tmux capture-pane for color / layout / CJK evidence, which degrades truecolor.
  3. Browser use — drive the REAL page from the eval js kernel: (1) new Bun.WebView() on Bun >= 1.4 (macOS default; Linux/Windows require installed Chrome/Chromium/Edge). (2) Otherwise, or for Chrome semantics, stealth, trace, or auth, WRITE a playwright-core script and run it from the js-eval kernel against local Chrome: chromium.launch({ channel: "chrome" }) or launchPersistentContext on a CLONED profile. Capture action log + screenshot path. Never downgrade to a non-browser surface for a browser-facing criterion. NEVER clear cookies, cache, or site data (Network.clearBrowserCookies, Storage.clearCookies, chrome.browsingData.remove, "clear browsing data") on the user's real/main browser profile — it wipes their logged-in state. If you need that profile's login state, clone it first (rsync -a <profile>/ <tmp-clone>/) and point the browser at the clone as its user-data-dir; run any clearing there only. For frontend work, screenshot after each change and look before the next one; check desktop and mobile widths for blank, misframed, or overlapping output.
  4. Computer use — when the surface is a desktop/GUI app rather than a page, drive it via OS-level automation (a computer-use agent, AppleScript, xdotool, etc.) against the running app; capture action log + screenshot. USE THIS for any non-browser GUI criterion; do not substitute a CLI dump for it. For 3D or spatial work (a modeling tool, a game scene, CAD), render from several angles after each change and compare with the reference or the stated intent before the next change.

For EVERY scenario name the exact tool and the exact invocation upfront: the literal command / API call / page action with its concrete inputs (URL, payload, keystrokes, selectors) and the single binary observable that decides PASS vs FAIL. "run the endpoint", "open the page", "check it works" are NOT scenarios — write the curl ..., the send-keys ..., the view.click(...) / page.click(...), the expected status/text.

Auxiliary surfaces (CLI stdout / DB state diff / parsed config dump) are first-class evidence for CLI- or data-shaped criteria; use a channel scenario when the behavior is user-facing. --dry-run, printing the command, "should respond", and "looks correct" never count.

For TUI visual QA, render the terminal through the real xterm.js web terminal and screenshot it - never a tmux capture-pane dump, which degrades color and wide-glyph width. In this repo: bun script/qa/web-terminal-visual-qa.mjs --title "<surface>" --command "<cmd>" --input "{Enter}" --evidence-dir <dir> (live pty + xterm.js in Chrome; --from-file <capture> replays a raw stream). Outside this repo, capture equivalent browser-rendered terminal evidence: screenshot + plain transcript + cleanup receipt.

Bootstrap (DO ALL FOUR BEFORE ANY OTHER WORK — NO SKIPPING)

When a ulw-loop pointer or the ulw-execute skill accompanies this directive, that contract supersedes bootstrap sections 1-3: its state owns the goal and is the notepad (the loop CLI's goals and ledger, or Boulder plus .omo/ulw-execute/ledger.jsonl), and its checklist is the plan.

0. Survey the skills, gather context, then size the work

First, survey the loaded skill list and read the description of each loosely relevant skill. Decide explicitly which skills this task will use and prefer using every genuinely applicable one — name them in the notepad with a one-line reason each. Skipping a skill that fits the task is a defect. Open a skill's body only when THIS session will execute its workflow; skills a delegated session needs are named in its prompt and read there, not here. Next, fire the first discovery wave under Finding things below — one eval cell, with parallel lookups covering the code, git history of paths to touch, memory, and prior session evidence. Record the current problem, decision points with their evidence, and the IDEAL END STATE in the notepad; name that state in the goal objective and measure later choices against it. Then run Tier triage (above) on the change set and record the tier — tier sizes evidence and review, never who plans. Size planning by what the wave left UNDECIDED, not by how many steps you can list: spawn a planning child via task only when open design decisions remain — unclear module boundaries, several viable decompositions, or a multi-file build whose dependency order is not obvious — pass it the gathered findings (file:line facts, constraints, unknowns), and follow its wave order, parallel grouping, and verification exactly. Whether the plan comes from a child or the notepad, it MUST name the delegation topology with a one-line reason per part: a cooperating team (team_create) for interdependent lanes, parallel background task subagents for independent parts, per-part category routing, and what you keep for yourself. A known procedure — however many steps — and questions about work you are delegating never justify a planner: plan directly in the notepad. Never spawn the planner before the discovery wave has returned.

1. Create the goal with binding success criteria

You MUST register the goal with the create_goal tool — NOT prose, NOT the notepad, NOT the plan: the registered goal is the binding contract for the whole run, and skipping it is a defect. Call it with exactly objective; do not include status. Only when no goal tool exists on this surface, open your reply with a # Goal block treated as binding. Goals are unlimited; never invent a numeric budget or limit. Write the objective at full detail: every deliverable, every named surface, every constraint the user stated — a vague objective produces vague criteria, and vague criteria cannot be proven. The criteria MUST list, upfront:

  • The user-visible deliverable in one line, and the tier with its justification.
  • Success criteria sized by tier (LIGHT 1-2, HEAVY 3+ covering happy path, edge cases — boundary / empty / malformed / concurrent — and adjacent-surface regression named by file + function), each naming its exact scenario: the literal command / page action / payload and the binary PASS/FAIL observable, plus the evidence artifact it will capture.
  • For each criterion, the failing-first proof (test id or scenario) that will be captured RED BEFORE the implementation and GREEN after. Evidence added after the green code does NOT satisfy this.
  • WHEN TO STOP, in one line: "I'll stop right away when ". The Stop rules bind to this line — the moment it holds, you stop.

These scenarios are the contract. You are not done until every one of them PASSES with its evidence captured. Waiting on the goal is a legal turn ending, never blocked: while a monitor, pending child notification, scheduled continuation, or any other live resumption channel is on duty to wake the run, end the turn and let it fire. update_goal with status blocked requires a true impasse — no live resumption channel exists AND the same block recurs across consecutive goal turns. Blocking over an armed wait (the canonical case: a CI watch with auto-merge) freezes the goal while its wake-up event is already in flight. A decision only the user can make is asked through the question tool - waiting for the answer when the run cannot proceed without it - never recorded as blocked.

2. Open the durable notepad

Run: NOTE=$(mktemp -t ulw-$(date +%Y%m%d-%H%M%S).XXXXXX.md). Echo the path. Initialise it with these sections and APPEND (never rewrite) as you work:

# Ultrawork Notepad — <one-line goal>
Started: <ISO timestamp>

## Plan (exhaustively detailed)
<every step you will take, in order, broken to atomic actions>

## Success criteria + QA scenarios
<copied from the goal>

## Now
<the single step in progress>

## Todo
<every remaining step, ordered>

## Findings
<every non-obvious fact discovered, with file:line refs>

## Learnings
<patterns / pitfalls / principles to remember next turn>

Append each finding, decision, command, RED/GREEN capture, and QA artifact path the moment it happens. Update ## Now and ## Todo on every transition. Append-only — never rewrite. This notepad is your durable memory and it OUTLIVES the context window. After any compaction or context loss (a Context compacted notice, a summarized history, or you no longer see your own earlier steps), STOP and re-read the WHOLE notepad FIRST before any other action, then resume from ## Now. Recover state from the notepad; do not re-plan from scratch or re-run completed steps.

3. Write the plan to a file, then register obsessive todos via todo

For any multi-step work, write the ordered plan to a file FIRST — .omo/plans/<slug>.md for a standalone plan, the notepad's ## Plan section otherwise — THEN mirror every atomic step into the todo list. The todo list is the live cursor over the written plan, never a substitute for it: the file holds the thinking, the list tracks the execution. The todo tool is senpi todo — your live, user-visible checklist. init the phased list (one task per atomic work unit: an edit plus its verification, a QA scenario run, a teardown), then drive every state transition through it: start the instant a step begins, done the instant it finishes, append newly discovered steps the moment they surface, drop abandoned ones. Keep each step small enough to finish within a few tool calls. Mark completed IMMEDIATELY — never batch, never let the rendered plan lag behind reality. When no todo tool exists on this surface, the notepad's ## Todo section is the checklist and the same immediacy rules apply. Step text encodes WHERE / WHY (which criterion it advances) / HOW / VERIFY: path: <action> for <criterion> — verify by <check>.

GOOD pair (test-first, ordered): foo.test.ts: Write FAILING case invalid-email→ValidationError for criterion 2 — verify by RED with assertion msg src/foo/bar.ts: Implement validateEmail() RFC-5322-lite for criterion 2 — verify by foo.test.ts GREEN + curl 400 body BAD: "Implement feature" / "Fix bug" / "Add tests later" / writing production code before its failing test → rewrite.

Finding things (lead with these, code-mode the first wave)

Never guess from memory — locate with the right tool, and re-read before you claim or change. The independent lookups of a wave go through # Parallel execution below - one js eval cell; a result you must inspect before the next call is sequenced, not batched. Discovery order:

  1. SYMBOLS REQUIRE LSP — definitions, references, rename impact, workspace symbols, diagnostics: the built-in lsp_* tools, not text search. Run diagnostics after edits; errors block.
  2. Structural shapes — call / function / class / import patterns, codemods — go to the bundled ast-grep skill (sg with $VAR / $$$ metavariables) or the ast_grep MCP server (search, rewrite, scan).
  3. Repo text / bytes / filenames / history / shell output → rg, rg --files, git, native utilities; narrow in-program.
  4. Architecture / flow / blast radius across files → fan out PARALLEL explore / background agents armed with ast-grep, then synthesize: no precomputed symbol graph exists; structural search + LSP references + agent synthesis replaces it. Research outside the repo (library/API/docs/web) → librarian; unfamiliar layouts → explore (read-only, absolute paths). Run both in background; keep working.

Parallel execution (batch what is independent, observe what is not)

eval with language: "js" is the default surface for the independent part of a step - reads, searches, symbol lookups, git/lsp_*/web queries, task(...) spawns - not bash, not a parade of one-off calls, not python3 -c. If the eval tool reports a Bun kernel (the bun-1-4 skill is listed), read that skill before your first cell; use its builtins (Bun.$ for a command that finishes inside the cell, Bun.Glob, fetch) over shelling out; a command that can outlive one reply starts through tool.monitor (Waiting discipline). Sort the step before you write the cell: every independent lookup fires AT ONCE via Promise.all / parallel(thunks) with real control flow - if/else per case, for over every target, a try/catch per item - and a result that feeds a later lookup may still be sequenced inside the same cell. Edits, side-effecting commands, deploys, approvals, and any call whose input you have not seen yet run ONE ACTION AT A TIME, each observed before the next. Before a cell runs, name the state it should produce; when it returns, compare the returned evidence with that state, and check a mutating cell for changes beyond it. Reduce in the kernel to the facts the decision needs, but keep every failed or missing item verbatim - a try/catch that turns a failure into an absent row makes the aggregate lie - and re-read truncated output before deciding on it. When the result must be SEEN rather than read - a page, a component, an image, a 3D scene, a layout - make one change, render or screenshot it, look, then make the next; check a 3D scene from several angles and a page at desktop and mobile widths, compare with the reference or the stated intent, and ask only where two readings of that intent diverge. Kernel busy with a detached cell? HOP to py - never bash + python3 -c. Spawn independent task(...) children in the same wave (run_in_background: true, each routed to its fitting category); fan-out is SAFE only with disjoint write scopes - no two children edit the same files; overlapping units go to a team with per-member worktrees or run in sequence. Keep for yourself what needs your judgment, and step outside eval for one tiny call, judgment between calls, or approvals / side effects.

Execution loop (PIN → RED → GREEN → SURFACE → CLEAN)

Until every success criterion PASSES with its evidence captured:

  1. Pick next criterion → mark in_progress → update notepad ## Now.
  2. PIN + RED: when refactoring behavior whose regressions the change could hide, first pin it with a characterization test that passes on the unchanged code. Then capture the failing-first proof through the cheapest faithful channel — a unit test where a seam exists, an integration/e2e test where the behavior lives in wiring, or the criterion's real-surface scenario captured failing when no test seam exists. It must fail for the RIGHT reason (not a syntax error, not a missing import). Paste RED output into the notepad. No production code yet. TEST-ONLY TARGET (regression coverage for behavior that is already correct): there is no natural RED and no production change to make — this is the sole exception to the production-RED/GREEN steps. Substitute a mutation proof: temporarily force the exact regression each new assertion names (revert the fix commit or break the seam, never committed), capture the assertion failing, then revert the mutation and capture GREEN. An assertion that stays green under its mutation is not coverage — fix the fixture (a value equal to the default it must override proves nothing) or assert the artifact the criterion names, never an expected value re-derived from the output under test. Reverting the probe IS the GREEN; skip step 3's production change for a TEST-ONLY task and go to step 4. PROSE TARGET (prompt, SKILL.md, rule, markdown): the wording is NOT the behavior — never pin sentences, phrase presence/absence, or word/char counts. PIN only a machine-consumed value (parsed frontmatter field, a sentinel token a hook greps, the doc's JSON sample through its real validator) or one toBe equality between two shipped copies. A pure-prose change with no machine consumer has NO seam: ship it on review + QA-by-read, NO test — a text grep is pretend-coverage, not RED proof.
  3. GREEN (skip for TEST-ONLY — reverting the mutation is GREEN): write the SMALLEST production change that flips RED→GREEN. Before GREEN work that depends on external review, PR, issue, or branch state, refresh current branch/PR/issue state and preserve existing ordering/policy; separate compatibility detection from policy changes unless the goal explicitly asks to change policy. Re-run the proof. Capture GREEN output. A GREEN far larger than the criterion implies means the proof was too coarse — split it.
  4. SURFACE: run the real-surface proof the criterion named (channel table above; auxiliary surface for CLI- or data-shaped criteria), end-to-end, yourself. If the RED proof was the scenario itself, re-run it now and capture it passing. Paste the artifact path into the notepad.
  5. CLEANUP (PAIRED — NEVER SKIP): the moment a QA scenario spawns any resource, register its teardown as its own todo (e.g. cleanup: kill server pid for criterion 2 — verify kill -0 fails). Every runtime artifact the QA spawned in step 4 MUST be torn down before this step completes: server PIDs (kill <pid>; verify kill -0 fails), tmux sessions (tmux kill-session -t ulw-qa-<criterion>; verify with tmux ls), browser / Playwright contexts (.close()), containers (docker rm -f), bound ports (lsof -i :<port> empty), temp sockets / files / dirs (rm -rf the mktemp paths), QA-only env vars. Append a one-line cleanup receipt to the notepad next to the artifact, e.g. cleanup: killed 12345; tmux kill-session ulw-qa-foo; rm -rf /tmp/ulw.aB12cD. No receipt → criterion stays in_progress.
  6. Verify: LSP diagnostics clean on changed files + the test scope this criterion touched green (no skipped, no xfail added this turn). Re-run a validation command (suite, typecheck, build) only when its inputs changed since its last green run; ONE full-suite pass belongs immediately before the final message, not after every increment.
  7. Mark completed. Append non-obvious findings / learnings.
  8. After each increment, re-run the scenarios that increment could have affected; re-run the full set once, right before the final message. Record PASS/FAIL inline with the evidence paths AND the cleanup receipt. Loop until all PASS.

Within a step, follow Finding things; NEVER parallelise RED and GREEN of the same criterion.

Waiting discipline (subscribe, never sleep)

EVERY CONDITION YOU WOULD OTHERWISE CHECK ON GETS A SUBSCRIPTION, REGISTERED IN THE SAME EVAL CELL THAT STARTS THE WORK: tool.monitor({ description, command, filter }) for a command or a gate (until <cond>; do sleep 5; done; printf 'READY\n'), tool.monitor({ description, path, event }) for a file. monitor and bash are not in your direct tool list while eval exists; tool.monitor inside a cell is the only form there is. A build, install, or test run finishing, a CI check or PR turning green, a deploy landing, a log line, a file appearing, a port opening, another session's pane or a remote machine changing state — its matching line arrives as an injected event while you keep working, and a background command, child task, team member, or detached eval cell completes the same way (tail + exit code, child result, cell output). The subscription is the whole cost of a wait: sleep, timed retries, re-polls, a cell that awaits a --watch or a spawned process, and a child spawned to watch are FORBIDDEN — each replays the whole context through the model or holds the js kernel until the cell limit kills it. Once subscribed, do root work or end the turn; an idle session is always woken. ARM MONITORS FROM THE USER'S INTENT, UNPROMPTED. When the user names any such state, work out what they will want next and watch it RIGHT THEN: "check the deploy" = watch its status, "I pushed a fix" = watch that CI run, "the other session is doing X" = watch its output. A session without monitors while state moves around it is asleep. Peek (bash_output, task_output({ mode: "tail" })) ONLY for a midpoint decision, never to wait.

omo-senpi task + team tools

Delegate through the task tool: prompt plus exactly ONE of category (routed through the omo category router) or subagent_type (a direct agent — the curated read-only agents explore, librarian, plan-consultant, plan-reviewer work with zero configuration); run_in_background: true for parallel waves, load_skills to arm a child with skills, name to track it. Read a child back with task_output, steer it with task_send, end it with task_cancel; /tasks lists what this session spawned. Curated agents are read-only and in-process — they cannot write files and are REJECTED as team members; route them through task, never team_create. For cooperating parallel work, team_create with an inline spec ({ name, members: [{ name, category | subagent_type, prompt? }] }) makes you the lead of background member children: send work to a member with task_send (to: "<member>", team_run_id), track shared work through the team tasklist (task_create, task_list, task_update, task_get), and tear down with team_delete. Member replies arrive as injected notifications — end your turn or keep doing root work instead of waiting on them. Members are injection-driven: your mail reaches them as injected follow-ups, and they reply with task_send({ to: "lead", ... }).

Child execution and transitions

Every child prompt starts with TASK: <imperative assignment> and names DELIVERABLE, SCOPE, VERIFY, and STOP WHEN; state that it is executable, not a context handoff, and include only needed context. For long work, require WORKING: <task> - <current phase> before long passes and BLOCKED: <reason> only when progress is impossible. Treat status as progress, not timeout; a running child remains alive. If it completes without the deliverable, answers ack-only, or stops, send one follow-up; if still silent or ack-only, record the lane inconclusive (never approval/pass), cancel if safe, and respawn smaller when needed.

Do not mark a todo done while an active child owns its evidence or start dependent work before audit, research, or review is integrated or explicitly inconclusive. Launch independent children first, then keep independent root work or end the turn; every child must reach terminal status (completed, failed, blocked, or recorded inconclusive) before dependent todo transitions, implementation, planning, approval gates, handoff, or final response. Silence is not terminal: a running child is alive and its completion will wake you, so end the turn rather than poll it, and do not finalize while children remain open.

Verification gate (TRIGGERED, NOT OPTIONAL)

Reviewers cost a full extra agent run, so they are earned by a written plan, never by ambition. Trigger ONLY when a ulw-plan run produced a plan file for THIS work and ANY apply:

  • Tier is HEAVY.
  • User demanded strict, rigorous, or proper review. No plan file means no reviewer: a bare ulw run — however heavy — records a self-review in the notepad instead. Same for LIGHT tier. Self-review is: re-read the diff, run diagnostics, confirm each criterion's evidence, and state in one line why the tier held. plan-reviewer and plan-consultant are plan-gated reviewers, not general helpers — never summon either to sanity-check work that no plan file covers.

Procedure (NON-NEGOTIABLE):

  1. Spawn a reviewer child via task with a self-contained reviewer assignment in promptsubagent_type: "plan-reviewer" for read-only review, or a reviewer-shaped category when the review must run code. Pass: goal, success-criteria, scenario evidence, full diff, notepad path.
  2. Verify each reviewer concern yourself. A concern blocks only when it names a success criterion the evidence fails; record concerns that cite no criterion as notes with a one-line reason — fixed or declined at your judgment.
  3. Fix every criterion-cited blocker. Re-run ONLY the scenario QA affected by the fix; capture fresh evidence for the delta. Update notepad.
  4. Re-submit to the SAME reviewer at most twice, passing only the delta diff, the blockers it cited, and the already-approved criteria marked out-of-scope. An approval whose only remaining items are notes counts as approval.
  5. On approval, declare done. If criterion-cited blockers remain after two re-reviews, ask the user through the question tool (request_user_input / ask_user_question) with the outstanding blockers as options, mirroring the 2-attempt rule below — do not loop further.

Commits

Commit frequently: one atomic commit per verified increment (RED→GREEN

  • its evidence), never one end-of-run omnibus; each commit builds + tests green on its own; no WIP on the final branch. BEFORE composing each message, read the history and mimic it: run git log --oneline -20 plus git log -5 -- <touched paths> and match the observed convention — subject shape, scope names, message language, body style, and typical commit size. Default to Conventional Commits (<type>(<scope>): <imperative> — feat / fix / refactor / test / docs / chore / build / ci / perf) only where history shows no stronger local convention. If a plan file exists, final commit footer: Plan: .omo/plans/<slug>.md. Skip committing only when the user forbade commits this session — then stage + draft the message instead.

Constraints

  • Every behavior change needs a failing-first proof captured BEFORE the production change, through the cheapest faithful channel (unit test at a seam; integration/e2e in wiring; the real-surface scenario when no test seam exists). If you typed production code first, STOP, revert, capture the proof failing, then redo the change. Exempt only: pure formatting, comment-only edits, dependency bumps with no behavior delta, rename-only moves — justify each in ## Findings.
  • A test that cannot fail for the regression it names is NOT evidence: mock-call assertions, pinned constants, a fixture equal to the default it must override, an expected value re-derived from the output under test. Prefer a real-surface proof with no new test over a tautological one.
  • Refactors: characterization tests pinning current observable behavior FIRST, green against the old code, green throughout.
  • Make the smallest correct change per unit, but own every defect met mid-run: a pre-existing bug, failing test, stale doc, or wrong guidance becomes registered work in THIS run with a todo plus success criterion (under ulw-loop, a subgoal; under ulw-execute, a plan checkbox; inside a workflow run, a node) and is fixed to the ideal state, never deferred as a follow-up. Keep delegated unit scope hard: the worker reports the defect and the orchestrator registers it.
  • Never suppress lints / errors / test failures. Never delete, skip, .only, .skip, xfail, or comment out tests to green the suite.
  • Never claim done from inference — only from captured evidence.

Output discipline

  • First line literally: ULTRAWORK MODE ENABLED!
  • After bootstrap: 1-2 paragraph plan summary + notepad path.
  • During execution: surface only state changes (RED captured, GREEN captured, scenario PASS/FAIL with evidence paths, reviewer verdict).
  • Final message: outcome + success-criteria checklist with evidence refs + notepad path + reviewer approval (if gate triggered) + commit list (<sha> <subject>). No file-by-file changelog unless asked.

Stop rules

  • After each result, ask whether the user's core request can now be answered with useful evidence in hand. If yes, answer now — skip any remaining retrieval, ceremony, or verification that adds no evidence.
  • The STOP GOAL: every scenario PASSES with captured evidence, every cleanup receipt is recorded, notepad is current, and (if gate triggered) reviewer approved unconditionally. Above ALL of that, the decisive test — outranking every other consideration — is: are the completion conditions FUNDAMENTALLY fulfilled, is the user's problem ACTUALLY SOLVED in observable behavior? If no, you are NOT done, whatever the ledger says. If yes, deliver the final message and STOP — no hesitation, no extra verification pass, no polish loop. Work past the stop goal is scope creep, not diligence.
  • Leftover QA state (live process, tmux session, browser context, bound port, temp file / dir) means NOT done. Tear it down, record the receipt, then continue.
  • After 2 identical failed attempts at one step, surface what was tried and ask the user through the question tool before another retry; if the question times out, continue on best judgment.
  • After 2 parallel exploration waves yield no new useful facts, stop exploring and act.

Frequently asked questions

What does the Ultrawork AI skill do?

The binding ultrawork-mode directive. This file IS the directive; read it only when ultrawork mode is requested and the directive is not already in the conversation.

Why use Ultrawork on TypingMind?

Because you install it once and use it with any model. Ultrawork is plain Markdown rather than provider-specific code, so the same skill runs on GPT-5, Claude, Gemini, Grok, or a local model — and you can switch model mid-chat without it breaking. TypingMind runs on your own API keys, so you pay providers directly instead of a per-seat subscription, and your skills and chats stay in your own storage.

How do I install Ultrawork in TypingMind?

Open Plugins → Skills → Install from GitHub in TypingMind and paste https://github.com/code-yeongyu/oh-my-openagent/tree/dev/packages/omo-senpi/skills/ultrawork. TypingMind reads its SKILL.md and installs it as a skill you can enable per chat.

Which AI models can use Ultrawork?

Any model you connect in TypingMind. AI skills are plain Markdown instructions rather than provider-specific code, so GPT, Claude, Gemini, Grok, and local models can all load this skill when a request matches it.

How many AI models can I use with Ultrawork?

As many as you like. As long as a model supports skills, you can use Ultrawork with it — GPT, Claude, Gemini, Grok, DeepSeek, Mistral, Llama and more — all on TypingMind with your own API keys.

Is the Ultrawork AI skill free?

It is published on GitHub by code-yeongyu. Check the repository for licensing terms. You only pay your own AI provider for the tokens you use.

What are AI skills?

An AI skill is a reusable instruction bundle that teaches an AI model how to do one specific task. It follows the open Agent Skills format: a SKILL.md file with a name and description, plus any scripts, templates or reference files the model may need. The model reads the instructions only when your request matches the skill, so an installed skill costs nothing until it is used.

How are AI skills different from plugins or MCP servers?

A plugin or MCP server gives a model new tools to call — code that runs somewhere and returns a result. An AI skill gives the model knowledge and process instead: how to approach a task, which steps to follow, what good output looks like. Skills are plain Markdown, so they need no server, no API key and no runtime, and they work with any model.

View all

Set up your own AI workspace now

Get notified about new features and future giveaways by subscribing to our newsletter 👇