Kb Web Severity Scoring

Web Severity Scoring

Severity Scoring Formula

textCopy code
Page Score = 100 - (sum of weighted findings)

Weights:
  Critical (confirmed, all three sources):   -18 points
  Critical (high confidence, both sources):  -15 points
  Critical (high confidence, single source): -10 points
  Critical (medium confidence):               -7 points
  Critical (low confidence):                  -3 points
  Serious (high confidence):                  -7 points
  Serious (medium confidence):                -5 points
  Serious (low confidence):                   -2 points
  Moderate (high confidence):                 -3 points
  Moderate (medium confidence):               -2 points
  Moderate (low confidence):                  -1 point
  Minor:                                      -1 point

Floor: 0 (minimum score)

Scoring Profiles

Use a profile to tune strictness by context while keeping comparable grade bands:

Apply the profile multiplier to each final deduction after confidence handling.

Formula

pseudocodeCopy code
page_score = 100
for each finding:
    base = lookup(severity, confidence_level, source_count)  // from table above
    multiplier = 1.2 if confidence_level == "confirmed" else 1.0
    deduction = base × multiplier
    page_score = max(0, page_score - deduction)

The values in the lookup table above are base deductions (pre-multiplier). "Confirmed" findings (validated by all three sources: axe-core + agent review + Playwright) apply an additional 1.2× multiplier.

Example: One Critical finding at confirmed confidence = 18 (base) × 1.2 = 21.6 points deducted → page score 78.

Calibration Layer (v2)

To reduce false-positive inflation and stabilize trends, apply a calibration coefficient by rule family:

textCopy code
calibrated_deduction = deduction × calibration_coefficient(rule_family)

Recommended initial coefficients:

Update coefficients quarterly from confirmed outcomes. Avoid changing coefficients more than +/-0.1 per cycle.

Score Grades

Each score, with its grade and meaning.

Confidence Levels

Each level, with weight and when to use.

Source Correlation

Issues found by both axe-core AND agent review are automatically upgraded to high confidence regardless of individual confidence ratings.

Issues found by all three sources (axe-core + agent review + Playwright behavioral testing) are upgraded to confirmed confidence with a 1.2x weight multiplier. This applies when:

• axe-core reports a violation
• Agent code review identifies the same issue
• Playwright behavioral scan confirms the issue at runtime (e.g., keyboard trap confirmed by actual Tab traversal, contrast failure confirmed by rendered CSS computation)

When Playwright is not available, the maximum achievable confidence remains High (100%). The confirmed tier is additive — it never downgrades findings.

Confidence Drift Guard

Track predicted confidence versus post-triage outcome and compute drift:

textCopy code
drift = abs(predicted_confidence_score - observed_confirmation_rate)

Operational guideline:

• drift <= 0.10: stable
• drift 0.11-0.20: tune coefficients and source mapping
• drift > 0.20: freeze profile changes and run rule-level review

Scorecard Format

Single Page

markdownCopy code
## Accessibility Score

| Metric | Value |
|--------|-------|
| Page | [URL] |
| Score | [0-100] |
| Grade | [A-F] |
| Critical | [count] |
| Serious | [count] |
| Moderate | [count] |
| Minor | [count] |

Multi-Page

markdownCopy code
## Accessibility Scorecard

| Page | Score | Grade | Critical | Serious | Moderate | Minor |
|------|-------|-------|----------|---------|----------|-------|
| / | 82 | B | 0 | 2 | 3 | 1 |
| /login | 91 | A | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 |
| /dashboard | 45 | D | 2 | 4 | 3 | 2 |
| **Average** | **72.7** | **C** | **2** | **6** | **8** | **4** |

Cross-Page Pattern Classification

Each pattern type, with its definition and remediation ROI.

Remediation Tracking

Change Classification

Each status, with its definition.

Progress Metrics

• Issue reduction: (fixed / previous_total) * 100
• Score change: current_score - previous_score
• Pages improved: count of pages with higher scores than previous audit
• Trend: improving (score up 5+), stable (within 5), declining (score down 5+)

Normalized Trend Metric (Cross-Audit)

When audit scope changes between runs, use normalized change:

textCopy code
normalized_score = raw_score - (scope_variance_penalty)
scope_variance_penalty = min(10, abs(previous_pages - current_pages) * 0.8)

Use normalized score for trend charts and use raw score for release gates.

Output Metadata (Recommended)

Include these fields in generated score artifacts for reproducibility:

yamlCopy code
scoring:
  model: web-severity-scoring-v2
  profile: balanced
  calibrationVersion: 2026-q2
  confidenceSources:
    - axe-core
    - agent-review
    - playwright
  failThresholds:
    critical: 1
    score: 75

This metadata allows deterministic re-runs and audit-to-audit comparisons.

Issue Severity Categories

Critical

• No keyboard access to essential functionality
• Missing form labels on required fields
• Images conveying critical information have no alt text
• Color is the sole means of conveying information
• Keyboard traps with no escape

Serious

• Missing skip navigation
• Poor heading hierarchy (skipped levels)
• Focus not visible on interactive elements
• Form errors not programmatically associated
• Missing ARIA on custom widgets

Moderate

• Redundant ARIA on semantic elements
• Suboptimal heading structure (multiple H1s)
• Missing autocomplete on identity fields
• Links to new tabs without warning
• Missing table captions

Minor

• Redundant title attributes
• Suboptimal button text
• Missing landmark roles where semantic elements exist
• Decorative images with non-empty alt text