AAAI Related Work
Use this to make the novelty claim robust under AAAI's broad AI review. The related-work section must help reviewers distinguish the paper from both archival work and contemporaneous non-archival work.
Positioning checks
- Identify the closest archival AI papers and current arXiv/workshop work.
- Separate method novelty, task novelty, evaluation novelty, and system integration novelty.
- Cite contemporaneous non-archival work carefully when it affects priority or reviewer expectations.
- Do not submit substantially similar work to multiple archival venues at the same time.
- Explain how the paper differs from AAAI/IJCAI/NeurIPS/ICML/ICLR neighbors in assumptions, evidence, scope, and contribution.
- Avoid using AI systems as citable scientific sources under AAAI policy.
Novelty paragraph
Use this structure:
textClosest prior work solves <problem> under <assumptions>. It does not address <specific missing setting/mechanism/evidence>. This paper contributes <new item> and verifies it through <evidence>. The claim is limited to <scope>.
Output format
text[Closest work] <paper/system/benchmark> [Difference axis] problem / method / theory / data / evaluation / system / impact [Must-cite items] <archival and contemporaneous work> [Multiple-submission risk] none / clarify / withdraw / reroute [Revision text] <AAAI-ready related-work paragraph>


