AAAI Writing Style
Use this to make a technically sound draft readable to a broad AI program committee. AAAI rewards clear AI contribution, not only subfield-specific benchmark wins.
AAAI framing
- State the AI problem, the new capability or insight, and the evidence in the first page.
- Make clear whether the contribution is method, theory, system, benchmark, dataset, evaluation, human-AI interaction, social impact, or alignment.
- Explain why the result matters outside a single dataset or implementation.
- Keep claims aligned with the reproducibility checklist and supplementary evidence.
- Discuss limitations and ethical considerations when the method affects people, safety, privacy, fairness, security, or social impact.
Two-column readability
- Use figures and tables as decision aids, not decoration.
- Keep notation lightweight and define it near first use.
- Use compact related-work contrasts instead of long literature catalogues.
- Make the Phase 1 summary easy: problem, method, evidence, limitation, checklist compliance.
- Avoid unsupported "general intelligence", "human-level", or "safe" claims.
Output format
text[AAAI fit sentence] <one sentence> [Contribution type] method / theory / system / benchmark / dataset / evaluation / social impact [First-page fixes] <problem, method, evidence, limitation> [Checklist alignment] pass / needs revision [Overclaim risks] <claims to narrow or evidence to add>


