Submission Preflight (agsy-submission)
The last check before pressing submit on Editorial Manager. AgSy is single anonymized, so there is no manuscript-anonymization step — but the front matter (abstract, Highlights, graphical abstract, declarations) and the data/code/model availability statement are where avoidable failures happen. Verify volatile specifics on the official page before relying on them.
When to trigger
- "Submitting tomorrow" — last pass before upload
- Unsure which files/metadata Editorial Manager expects
- Confirming the article type's guideline length is met and all front matter is prepared
Process facts (verify volatile items on the official page)
- Publisher: Elsevier (ISSN 0308-521X print / 1873-2267 online).
- Portal: Editorial Manager (legacy
ees.elsevier.com/agsyredirects there — confirm current URL). - Review model: single anonymized — no manuscript anonymization required (待核实).
- Article types: Research paper (~8,000 words), Short communication (~4,000), Perspective (~2,000, rapid review), Comment (~1,000), Review (verify) — no hard word cap, but stay near the guideline.
- Abstract: ≤ 250 words.
- Highlights + graphical abstract: prepared.
- Declarations: CRediT author-contribution statement; declaration of competing interest; ORCID for authors.
- Data/code/model: repository deposit + data-availability statement (Elsevier research-data policy).
- Fee: subscription journal with a hybrid Gold OA option; confirm any APC after acceptance (待核实).
Preflight checklist
Article type & length
- Article type chosen; length near its guideline (research ~8,000 / short comm ~4,000 / perspective ~2,000 / comment ~1,000)
- Abstract ≤ 250 words; states purpose, principal results, major conclusions
- Highlights drafted; graphical abstract prepared
Systems content (fit)
- The systems question (interactions / hierarchical levels / trade-offs) is explicit
- Model described, calibrated, and independently evaluated; sensitivity/uncertainty reported
- Decision / management / policy relevance stated (see
agsy-impact-and-implications)
Format & declarations
- References in the journal's style; consistent throughout
- CRediT roles + declaration of competing interest completed
- ORCID for authors; corresponding author and contact details correct
- Figures/tables self-contained and accessible (see
agsy-figures-and-tables)
Data, code & compliance
- Data + code + model deposited; data-availability statement in the manuscript
(see
agsy-reproducibility-and-data-policy) - Ethics / funding / conflict declarations complete
- Original work; preprint status checked against Elsevier sharing policy
Anti-patterns
- Abstract over 250 words; missing Highlights or graphical abstract
- No CRediT / competing-interest statement; missing ORCID
- A single-factor field trial sent to a systems journal (fit failure — see
agsy-review-process) - A black-box model with no calibration/evaluation or no data/code/model deposit
- Sending a full study to the Perspective track (wrong type and length)
Output format
【Article type】Research / Short comm / Perspective / Comment / Review (length near guideline? Y/N) 【Abstract】word count (≤250); Highlights + graphical abstract? [Y/N] 【Systems content】question + model + evaluation + decision relevance? [Y/N] 【Declarations】CRediT + COI + ORCID? [Y/N] 【Data/code/model】deposited + availability statement? [Y/N] 【References】journal style consistent? [Y/N] 【Next】await decision → agsy-revision-and-rebuttal on revision
Supplementary resources
../../resources/external_tools.md— reference managers, typesetting, repositories../../resources/official-source-map.md— official AgSy URLs behind every fact in this pack


