Auto-Decision Engine
Iterative decision simulation. Spend compute to think better. Five persona analysts as independent subagents, anonymized peer review, mechanical convergence — until the answer is robust.
The output is a possibility map: every hypothesis, every first/second-order effect, every council disagreement, every adversarial scenario, every assumption that must hold. The recommendation is one synthesis of that map, written at the end of the brief — never the product, never compressed into the lead.
How this skill is organized
SKILL.md (this file) is the entry point and contract — the rules below are non-negotiable. The full loop protocol lives in references/engine-protocol.md; per-phase protocols live in references/phases/*.md; canonical structure for the brief lives in references/brief-schema.json. The references table at the bottom is the single source of truth for where to read each thing.
Command Routing
triggers: (frontmatter above) is the canonical list. Each routes to a per-command protocol file:
/autodecision <decision>(default 2 iterations) → executereferences/engine-protocol.mdend-to-end/autodecision --iterations N <decision>→ 1 = medium (council, no convergence), 2 = full default, 3-5 = deep/autodecision --context file1 [file2 ...] <decision>→ attach context documents (Claude Code only). Files are extracted, tagged[D#], and threaded through the full pipeline. Seereferences/phases/scope.md"Context File Extraction"./autodecision:quick <decision>→references/engine-protocol.md"Quick Mode Protocol" section/autodecision:compare "A" vs "B"→ quick mode on both, then side-by-side comparison/autodecision:revise {slug} "{change}"→references/phases/revise.md/autodecision:challenge "{action}"→references/phases/challenge.md(adversary-only, ~5 min)/autodecision:summarize {slug}→ compress an existing brief to one page/autodecision:publish {slug} [--summary]→references/phases/publish.md/autodecision:plan→ Phase 0 (SCOPE) interactive only/autodecision:review→ read past runs, compare predictions vs outcomes/autodecision:export→ bundle journal + assumptions + briefs into portable archive
Non-Negotiable Rules
-
NEVER simulate in a vacuum. Phase 1 (GROUND) is mandatory. If WebSearch yields nothing, mark the run UNGROUNDED in the brief header — do not proceed silently.
-
Phase 1.5 (ELICIT) runs after GROUND, before the loop, unless
--skip-elicit. The single biggest quality lever — never default-off. -
Each persona runs as a SEPARATE Agent subagent. Genuine context-window independence. Sequential authoring in one context destroys diversity. Non-negotiable.
-
The main conversation IS the orchestrator. Walk the phases yourself. Spawn agents for parallelizable tasks (5 personas, critique + adversary). NEVER spawn one agent to "run the loop" — that agent can't spawn grandchildren and the council collapses. See
engine-protocol.md"Orchestration Model." -
The 5 canonical personas are the default. Optimist, Pessimist, Competitor, Regulator, Customer. ELICIT may modify (rename, specify a competitor), add (e.g., "Investor" for fundraising), or remove (e.g., Regulator when irrelevant) personas. Custom personas follow the same structure: optimization objective, blind spot, contrarian question, no-hedging rule. Names defined in
references/persona-council.md"Canonical Persona Names." -
Every effect carries a stable
effect_id, a probability, aprobability_range, and explicit assumption keys. The Judge compares by ID across iterations — descriptions drift, IDs don't. No implicit assumptions. Assumption keys are as stable as effect_ids: iteration 2+ personas receive the fullall_assumptionsmap from iter-1'seffects-chains.jsonand MUST reuse keys verbatim for conceptually-identical assumptions. Renamingmarket_has_demandtomarket_demand_existsbetween iterations fakes instability and breaks the Judge'sassumption_stabilitymetric. Seephases/simulate.md"Assumption Key Stability." -
Persona disagreement IS the uncertainty signal. The probability range is the data — never average it away.
-
Generate 2nd-order effects for ALL 1st-order effects. No probability gate. Tail risks matter most.
-
Anonymize during peer review. Personas review "Analysis A", "Analysis B" — never by name. Mapping randomized per iteration.
-
The Decision Brief is for humans. Never emit
snake_case, never backtick raweffect_ids in prose. Use thedescriptionfield. Seereferences/phases/decide.md. -
Phase 8.5 (VALIDATE-BRIEF) is mandatory for full/medium/revise/quick. It means literally invoking
scripts/validate-brief.pyagainst the schema. Writing a custom inline Python validation script (checking for your own invented section headers, declaring "13/13 passed" against a list you authored) IS NOT Phase 8.5. It is self-certification. Self-certification against invented headers is a HARD protocol violation — it silently lets a structurally broken brief ship. If the named script cannot run (e.g.,python3missing), fall back to the Step 5.5 self-check inphases/decide.mdand emit the structural-self-check footer. Do NOT roll your own validator. On HARD_FAIL, re-prompt DECIDE once; if still failing, prependVALIDATION_FAILEDand continue. Seereferences/phases/validate-brief.md.Writer must not invent section headers. The brief's H2 structure is defined by
references/brief-schema.jsonand is MANDATORY. Inventing headers like## Context,## Decision tilt,## The possibility map,## Methodology,## Analysis Approach(any header not in the schema) is a HARD_FAIL, even if it reads well. Improving readability is the schema's job, not the writer's. Do Step 4a's pre-write checklist before composing a single line. -
Stop when the Judge says so. Max iterations configurable (default 2, up to 5). The iteration folders ARE the memory — read previous iteration's
convergence-summary.md(≤500 tokens) before starting the next, never the full JSON. -
Subagent nesting. If
/autodecisionruns inside another agent, the Agent tool may be unavailable. STOP and ask the user (full protocol inengine-protocol.md). Never silently degrade. -
Read
references/engine-protocol.mdBEFORE starting any phase. This is not "on demand" — it is the first file you read after SKILL.md. If you have not read engine-protocol.md in this conversation, stop and read it now. The protocol defines the loop structure, file writes, and orchestration model. Without it, you will write a one-shot memo instead of running the actual loop. -
Intermediate files are mandatory — no brief without a loop. Before Phase 8 (DECIDE) can start, the run directory MUST contain:
config.json(Phase 0),ground-data.md(Phase 1), at least oneiteration-{N}/effects-chains.json(Phase 3), andconvergence-log.json(Phase 7). If these files do not exist, the loop did not run. Do NOT write a brief from memory or from the context file alone. Go back and run the missing phases. A Decision Brief without upstream data files is fabricated, not analyzed. -
The Decision Brief has exactly 16 H2 sections in full mode. They are, in order:
## Executive Summary,## Data Foundation,## Hypotheses Explored,## Effects Map,## Council Dynamics,## Minority-View Winners(optional),## Stable Insights,## Fragile Insights,## Adversarial Scenarios,## Key Assumptions,## Convergence Log,## Recommendation,## Appendix A: Decision Timeline,## Appendix B: Complete Effects Map,## Appendix C: Quick Mode vs Full Loop Comparison(optional),## Sources. Writing a brief with different section names — "Evidence Summary", "Options Considered", "Adversary Findings", "Sensitivity Analysis", "Persona Council Results", "Critique Findings" — is a HARD_FAIL. These are NOT schema headers. Use the exact headers above.
References
Read on-demand as each phase begins. Each phase file opens with a self-describing metadata block (phase number, when it runs, what it reads, what it writes, what gates it has) — always read that block first.
| Reference | File |
|---|---|
| Full loop protocol | references/engine-protocol.md |
| Progress tracker templates (per mode) | references/progress-templates.md |
| Persona definitions + canonical names + subagent protocol | references/persona-council.md |
| Shared persona prompt preamble | references/persona-preamble.md |
| Effects chain JSON spec | references/effects-chain-spec.md |
| Phase 0: Scope | references/phases/scope.md |
| Phase 1: Ground | references/phases/ground.md |
| Phase 1.5: Elicit | references/phases/elicit.md |
| Phase 2: Hypothesize | references/phases/hypothesize.md |
| Phase 2.5: Clarify | references/phases/clarify.md (iter-1 only; skippable with --skip-clarify) |
| Phase 3: Simulate | references/phases/simulate.md |
| Phase 4: Critique | references/phases/critique.md |
| Phase 5: Adversary | references/phases/adversary.md |
| Phase 6: Sensitivity | references/phases/sensitivity.md |
| Phase 7: Converge | references/phases/converge.md |
| Phase 8: Decide | references/phases/decide.md |
| Phase 8.5: Validate Brief | references/phases/validate-brief.md |
| Revise protocol | references/phases/revise.md |
| Challenge protocol | references/phases/challenge.md |
| Publish protocol | references/phases/publish.md |
| Output validation rules (canonical) | references/validation.md |
| Decision Brief template (human view) | references/output-format.md |
| Decision Brief schema (canonical structure) | references/brief-schema.json |
| Decision journal spec | references/journal-spec.md |
| Assumption library spec | references/assumption-library-spec.md |
| Templates | references/templates/{pricing,expansion,build-vs-buy,hiring}.md |
If anything in this file conflicts with references/engine-protocol.md, the protocol file wins — it is canonical for loop mechanics. This file is the entry-point contract; the protocol file is the manual.


