Benchmark And Mms Planner logo

Benchmark And Mms Planner

Community
HeshamFS
benchmark-and-mms-planner

Plan verification and validation campaigns for simulation codes using manufactured solutions, canonical benchmark problems, grid/time refinement, uncertainty propagation, and pass/fail acceptance criteria. Use when an agent needs to prove a solver, model, or result is trustworthy rather than only plausible.

Overview

PublisherHeshamFS
Repositorymaterials-simulation-skills
Skill namebenchmark-and-mms-planner
Stars
83
Forks
6
Bundled files
4
LicenseApache-2.0
Links
  • Markdown instructions

    A SKILL.md file the model loads on demand, so it only costs tokens when a request actually matches.

  • Works with any LLM

    AI skills are plain Markdown, not provider-specific code, so this works with GPT, Claude, Gemini, Grok, or a local model.

  • 4 bundled files

    Scripts, templates, and references the model can read while it works. Files are read-only and never executed.

  • Open source

    Published by HeshamFS on GitHub. Read the source before you install it.

Installation

Install the Benchmark And Mms Planner AI skill in TypingMind to use it with any LLM, or drop it into another agent that reads SKILL.md.

1

Install in TypingMind

TypingMind installs a skill straight from its GitHub folder — it reads SKILL.md, bundles the resource files, and stores the result locally.

  1. Open the app and go to Plugins → Skills.
  2. Choose "Install from GitHub".
  3. Paste the skill folder URL below and confirm.
    https://github.com/HeshamFS/materials-simulation-skills/tree/main/skills/verification-validation/benchmark-and-mms-planner
  4. Enable the skill in any chat where you want it available.
Plugins → Skills → Add skill → From GitHub URL, then paste the folder URL and press Continue.
2

Install in another agent

Any agent that reads the Agent Skills format can use this skill — copy the folder into that agent's skills directory.

Claude Code — .claude/skills
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/HeshamFS/materials-simulation-skills.git /tmp/materials-simulation-skills
mkdir -p .claude/skills
cp -r /tmp/materials-simulation-skills/skills/verification-validation/benchmark-and-mms-planner .claude/skills/benchmark-and-mms-planner
Restart Claude Code after copying so it picks up the new skill.

Use it in TypingMind

Enable Benchmark And Mms Planner in any TypingMind chat and the model takes it from there. Its name and description sit in the system prompt, and the moment a request matches, the model loads the full instructions itself — you never invoke it by hand, and it costs no tokens until it is actually used.

The model loads Benchmark And Mms Planner on its own as soon as a request matches it.

Works with any AI model

AI skills are plain Markdown instructions rather than provider-specific code, so Benchmark And Mms Planner is not tied to the model it was written for. Install it once in TypingMind and use it with GPT-5, Claude, Gemini, Grok, DeepSeek, Mistral, Llama, or a local model you run yourself — all on your own API keys.

  • Loaded only when it is needed

    The system prompt carries just the name and description. The instructions are fetched on the first matching request, so an idle skill costs nothing.

  • Switch models mid-chat

    Because the skill is instructions rather than code, changing model does not break it — the next model reads the same SKILL.md.

Skill instructions

This is the SKILL.md content the model loads. Read it before installing — a skill is instructions your model will follow.

Benchmark And MMS Planner

Goal

Design a verification and validation plan before trusting simulation results. The skill helps agents choose manufactured solutions, benchmark cases, refinement protocols, uncertainty checks, and pass/fail criteria.

Requirements

  • Python 3.10+
  • No external dependencies
  • Works on Linux, macOS, and Windows

Inputs to Gather

InputDescriptionExample
PDE or model classGoverning familydiffusion, elasticity, phase-field
Quantity of interestMetric to validateinterface velocity, L2 temperature error
Dimension1, 2, or 32
Expected orderFormal discretization order2
Reference availabilityAnalytic, benchmark, or noneanalytic
Risk levelCost or consequence of wrong resulthigh

Decision Guidance

  • Use MMS when code correctness is uncertain and an analytic solution can be injected.
  • Use canonical benchmarks when physical model validation matters more than code verification.
  • Use grid/time refinement whenever the result is used for a claim, design decision, or comparison.
  • Use uncertainty propagation when inputs are calibrated, noisy, or experimentally measured.

Script Outputs

scripts/benchmark_mms_planner.py emits inputs and results with:

  • verification_strategy
  • effective_model — the resolved model family actually used; unknown families fall back to general.
  • mms_plan
  • benchmark_cases
  • refinement_protocol (dimension, levels, spacing_ratio, expected_order, accept_observed_order_min, include_time_refinement)
  • uncertainty_plan (propagate_inputs, report_error_bars, separate_discretization_and_model_error) — propagation/error-bar guidance driven by risk level and reference type.
  • acceptance_criteria
  • warnings

The accept_observed_order_min is an engineering screening heuristic, not a certified bound: it is the formal expected_order reduced by a fractional tolerance (10% for high risk, 20% otherwise) and floored at first-order convergence (1.0). The relative band keeps strictness consistent across formal orders. See references/vv_patterns.md.

Workflow

  1. Collect the governing model, quantity of interest, and risk level.
  2. Run benchmark_mms_planner.py --json.
  3. Treat warnings as blockers for high-risk claims.
  4. Convert the returned protocol into tests, simulation runs, or review checklist items.
bash
python3 skills/verification-validation/benchmark-and-mms-planner/scripts/benchmark_mms_planner.py \
  --model diffusion \
  --quantity "L2 error in temperature" \
  --dimension 2 \
  --expected-order 2 \
  --reference analytic \
  --risk high \
  --json

Error Handling

  • If the dimension or expected order is invalid, stop and correct the model description.
  • If no reference exists, use conservation and convergence checks but do not call the result validated.

Limitations

This skill plans verification work; it does not run the solver or prove that a physical model is appropriate for an experiment.

Verification checklist

Before trusting a result that used this planner, record concrete evidence for each item:

  • Ran benchmark_mms_planner.py --json and saved the inputs block, confirming the echoed dimension, expected_order, reference, and risk match the actual run (a fallback to effective_model: general was intentional, not a typo in --model).
  • Executed the refinement_protocol: used the reported levels (3, or 4 for high risk) of systematically refined grids at spacing_ratio 2, and recorded the observed order of accuracy from those runs.
  • Confirmed the observed order is at or above accept_observed_order_min; if below, logged the investigation (mesh not yet asymptotic, boundary/source errors, limiter activation) rather than treating the result as passed.
  • When include_time_refinement is true, ran a separate time-step refinement study and recorded the temporal observed order, not just the spatial one.
  • When mms_plan.manufacture_solution is true, derived the symbolic source/forcing term, applied the matching boundary terms, and recorded the L2 and Linf error norms versus the manufactured solution.
  • Checked every acceptance_criteria item with a number: conservation/balance closes within a documented tolerance, the quantity of interest plateaus under refinement, and any benchmark discrepancy from benchmark_cases is explained before production use.
  • Treated all entries in warnings as blockers for high-risk claims and recorded how each was resolved (e.g. an independent analytic/published reference was added when reference was none or experimental).

Common pitfalls & rationalizations

Tempting shortcutWhy it's wrong / what to do
"The planner ran and printed a plan, so the result is verified."The script only plans V&V; it never runs the solver. Verification comes from executing the refinement_protocol, MMS, and acceptance_criteria, not from generating the plan.
"Two grids converged, so the observed order is fine."refinement_protocol.levels is 3 (4 for high risk) for a reason: you need >=3 systematically refined grids to estimate observed order and confirm the solution is in the asymptotic range before quoting it.
"Observed order beats accept_observed_order_min, so it's certified."That threshold is an engineering screening heuristic (formal order minus a 10%/20% relative tolerance, floored at 1.0), not a certified bound. For rigorous order verification run a Richardson/GCI study.
"Steady-looking model, so I can skip include_time_refinement."If the planner set include_time_refinement: true (any time-dependent or general fallback family), spatial refinement alone hides temporal error — run the time-step study too.
"We matched a benchmark, so the code is validated."Matching benchmark_cases or converging shows the code approaches some solution; it does not prove the physical model is correct. Validation needs an independent reference plus model-error separation, not convergence alone.
"reference none is fine, the runs look physical."With reference: none the strategy is verification-only; warnings says so. You may report convergence and conservation but must NOT call the result validated.
"Unknown model name, so I'll ignore the general fallback."An unrecognized --model silently resolves to effective_model: general; confirm that fallback is intended, since it changes both benchmark_cases and the time-refinement decision.

Security

Input Validation

All inputs are command-line arguments parsed by argparse; validation happens in plan_vv (and partly in the parser). Any rejected input causes the script to print the error to stderr and exit with code 2.

  • dimension must be exactly 1, 2, or 3; any other integer is rejected.
  • expected_order must be a positive, finite number (NaN, infinity, zero, and negatives are rejected).
  • risk must be one of the allowlist low, medium, high (enforced both as an argparse choice and re-checked in plan_vv).
  • reference must be one of the allowlist analytic, benchmark, experimental, none (enforced both as an argparse choice and re-checked in plan_vv).
  • model and quantity are capped at 256 characters (MAX_FIELD_LEN); longer strings are rejected.
  • The string content of model and quantity is otherwise not allowlisted or sanitized: quantity is echoed verbatim into the output, and an unrecognized model family is silently resolved to general rather than rejected.

File Access

  • The script reads and writes no files; all I/O is command-line args -> stdout JSON (or a short plain-text summary), with errors on stderr.
  • Because no filesystem paths are accepted or constructed, there is no path-traversal surface and no path-sandboxing logic is needed.
  • The only DoS-relevant size limit is the 256-character cap on model and quantity; numeric outputs are bounded by the validated inputs.

Tool Restrictions

The frontmatter declares allowed-tools: Read, Bash, Write, Grep, Glob.

  • Bash is used solely to run the bundled scripts/benchmark_mms_planner.py (e.g. the python3 ... --json invocation in the Workflow).
  • Read, Grep, and Glob are for inspecting the skill's own files and references (e.g. references/vv_patterns.md) when planning.
  • Write supports turning the returned protocol into test stubs or checklist files; the planner script itself never writes.

Safety Measures

  • No eval, exec, or dynamic code execution; the planner is pure Python computing a dictionary.
  • The script spawns no subprocesses and invokes no external solvers, so there are no subprocess argument lists to escape.
  • No pickle or other deserialization of untrusted data is performed; output is serialized with json.dumps.
  • The 256-character field cap is the explicit DoS guard against pathological input strings.

References

  • See references/vv_patterns.md for MMS, benchmark, and uncertainty planning notes.

Version History

  • 1.1.3: Add a "Verification checklist" (evidence-based items tied to the planner's refinement_protocol, mms_plan, acceptance_criteria, and warnings) and a "Common pitfalls & rationalizations" table that pins down domain-specific V&V shortcuts (plan != verification, >=3 grids for observed order, screening band is not a certified bound, time refinement, convergence != validation, reference none, general fallback).
  • 1.1.1: Make the eval suite discriminating by adding deterministic script_checks that pin the planner's specific output (resolved verification_strategy, the relative accept_observed_order_min band, refinement levels, include_time_refinement, uncertainty_plan flags, model-specific benchmark cases, and the exact warning strings) for each of the three cases.
  • 1.1.0: Resolve unknown model families to general once so benchmark selection and the time-refinement decision agree (transient unlisted PDEs no longer skip time refinement); echo the resolved family as effective_model. Replace the fixed absolute observed-order offset with a relative tolerance floored at first order. Document uncertainty_plan, effective_model, and the acceptance heuristic. Add 256-character caps on string inputs.
  • 1.0.0: Initial benchmark and MMS planning skill.

Bundled files

The model reads these on demand while the skill is loaded. They are exposed as readable files and are never executed.

Frequently asked questions

What does the Benchmark And Mms Planner AI skill do?

Plan verification and validation campaigns for simulation codes using manufactured solutions, canonical benchmark problems, grid/time refinement, uncertainty propagation, and pass/fail acceptance criteria. Use when an agent needs to prove a solver, model, or result is trustworthy rather than only plausible.

Why use Benchmark And Mms Planner on TypingMind?

Because you install it once and use it with any model. Benchmark And Mms Planner is plain Markdown rather than provider-specific code, so the same skill runs on GPT-5, Claude, Gemini, Grok, or a local model — and you can switch model mid-chat without it breaking. TypingMind runs on your own API keys, so you pay providers directly instead of a per-seat subscription, and your skills and chats stay in your own storage.

How do I install Benchmark And Mms Planner in TypingMind?

Open Plugins → Skills → Install from GitHub in TypingMind and paste https://github.com/HeshamFS/materials-simulation-skills/tree/main/skills/verification-validation/benchmark-and-mms-planner. TypingMind reads its SKILL.md and bundles its files and installs it as a skill you can enable per chat.

Which AI models can use Benchmark And Mms Planner?

Any model you connect in TypingMind. AI skills are plain Markdown instructions rather than provider-specific code, so GPT, Claude, Gemini, Grok, and local models can all load this skill when a request matches it.

How many AI models can I use with Benchmark And Mms Planner?

As many as you like. As long as a model supports skills, you can use Benchmark And Mms Planner with it — GPT, Claude, Gemini, Grok, DeepSeek, Mistral, Llama and more — all on TypingMind with your own API keys.

Is the Benchmark And Mms Planner AI skill free?

Yes. It is published on GitHub by HeshamFS under the Apache-2.0 license. You only pay your own AI provider for the tokens you use.

What are AI skills?

An AI skill is a reusable instruction bundle that teaches an AI model how to do one specific task. It follows the open Agent Skills format: a SKILL.md file with a name and description, plus any scripts, templates or reference files the model may need. The model reads the instructions only when your request matches the skill, so an installed skill costs nothing until it is used.

How are AI skills different from plugins or MCP servers?

A plugin or MCP server gives a model new tools to call — code that runs somewhere and returns a result. An AI skill gives the model knowledge and process instead: how to approach a task, which steps to follow, what good output looks like. Skills are plain Markdown, so they need no server, no API key and no runtime, and they work with any model.

View all

Set up your own AI workspace now

Get notified about new features and future giveaways by subscribing to our newsletter 👇