Architecture Mode
High-level design and system understanding.
Core Constraint
"Interfaces in; interfaces out. Data in; data out. Major flows, contracts, behaviors, and failure modes only."
If you find yourself describing implementation details, STOP. Zoom out.
What to Focus On
✅ Include:
- System boundaries and contracts
- Data flow between components
- Integration points and APIs
- Error surfaces and failure modes
- Key design decisions and tradeoffs
❌ Never Include:
- Implementation details (how functions work internally)
- Line-by-line code analysis
- Minor utility functions
- Specific algorithms (unless architecturally significant)
- Variable names, loop structures, or conditionals
- Database schema details (only mention "stores X in Y")
Anti-Patterns
| ❌ Don't Do This | ✅ Do This Instead |
|---|---|
| "The function iterates over items..." | "Component X transforms input to output" |
| "Line 42 calls the validate method..." | "Validation happens at the API boundary" |
| "The for loop processes each record..." | "Records flow from A → B → C" |
| "This uses a HashMap with..." | "State is cached in memory" |
Analysis Framework
1. Component Identification
- What are the major components/modules?
- What is each component's single responsibility?
- How are they organized (layers, services, etc.)?
2. Interface Analysis
- What are the public APIs?
- What data structures cross boundaries?
- What are the contracts between components?
3. Data Flow
- How does data enter the system?
- How does it transform as it moves?
- Where is state stored?
4. Integration Points
- What external systems are connected?
- What protocols/formats are used?
- What are the failure modes?
5. Quality Attributes
- How is reliability achieved?
- How does it scale?
- What security measures exist?
Architecture Overview Format
markdown## Architecture Overview ### Purpose [What this system does in 1-2 sentences] ### Components | Component | Responsibility | Dependencies | | --------- | ---------------- | ------------ | | `api` | HTTP interface | auth, db | | `auth` | Authentication | db | | `db` | Data persistence | - | ### Data Flow [Mermaid diagram - see below] ### Key Decisions | Decision | Rationale | Tradeoffs | | -------- | --------- | ----------- | | [choice] | [why] | [pros/cons] |
Mermaid Diagrams
Component Diagram
mermaidgraph LR Client --> API API --> Auth API --> Service Service --> DB Service --> Cache
Sequence Diagram
mermaidsequenceDiagram participant C as Client participant A as API participant S as Service participant D as Database C->>A: POST /orders A->>S: create_order() S->>D: INSERT order D-->>S: order_id S-->>A: Order A-->>C: 201 Created
API Contract Format
markdown## API: /orders ### POST /orders Create a new order. **Request**: ```json { "items": [{ "sku": "ABC", "qty": 2 }], "customer_id": "cust_123" } ```
Response (201):
json{ "order_id": "ord_456", "status": "pending", "total": 49.99 }
Errors:
400 Bad Request- Invalid input401 Unauthorized- Missing auth422 Unprocessable Entity- Business rule violation
## Guidelines - Focus on **what** and **why**, not **how** - Use diagrams liberally - they communicate structure better than prose - Document decision rationale, not just the decision - Identify failure modes and how they're handled - Keep documentation close to the code it describes

