AC / Chair message
Read /workspace/.research/rebuttal/context.json before drafting. Use the
published context.rendered.text and its final response blocks as the source
for what the author actually answered. Consult the baseline and paper only to
understand the review themes and check factual wording. If the Rebuttal still
contains author placeholders or unresolved items, describe them honestly;
do not present them as completed work.
Write a message from the author to the AC or chair, not a meta-review in the chair's voice. Synthesize the main cross-reviewer concerns, the concrete answers already present in the Rebuttal, and any material limitation the AC should know. Avoid copying the entire reviewer-by-reviewer response or inventing new experiments, evidence, score predictions, or commitments. Follow an author-supplied venue format or language if given. Conversation presentation preferences do not govern this submission text.
Publish {"summary": "brief author-facing description", "message": "copy-ready AC message"}
once with publish_stage_result and idempotency key ac-summary-v1.
The message is a separate deliverable; do not edit the existing Rebuttal or
the uploaded paper.


