Proposal Research Foundation and Feasibility
Use this skill only for the proposal foundation and feasibility stage.
Read the method reference completely before acting: references/foundation-and-feasibility.md.
You may read any project source file for context. Write only
sections/06-feasibility.typ.
Project documents are optional context. Their names describe their role; decide whether and when to read each one from the current stage and request. The presence of a project document does not make it mandatory input.
Workflow
- Select the foundation, completed methods, author materials, and source-grounded facts needed to assess capability and feasibility.
- Document only real preliminary work, team capabilities, facilities, data access, collaborations, and institutional support supplied by the author or trusted source material.
- Explain which planned task or project risk each foundation item supports; do not present a biography or equipment inventory as proof by itself.
- Assess goal, technical, resource, schedule, and risk feasibility against the completed objectives and methods.
- Ask the author for missing consequential facts. Never invent publications, results, team members, facilities, data access, or available resources.
- Keep achieved facts distinct from planned work and conditional risk controls.
- Write the Typst section, then call
publish_stage_resultfrom the enabled LLM4AD stage MCP server with the written path, summary, any citation keys used,context_patch, and a stable idempotency key. Tool success is the stage-completion signal; repair and retry validation errors in the same conversation. Upsert durable author-confirmed facts or decisions newly established or corrected in this stage under model-defined stable keys. Do not repeat untouched blocks or force a fixed field structure.
Quality checks
- Every feasibility claim has author-provided or source-grounded support.
- Every required method has credible expertise, resources, time, and a fallback.
- Achieved work and proposed work are unmistakably separated.
- Names, results, facilities, and team facts are not inferred or embellished.


