Subwave Llm Bench logo

Subwave Llm Bench

CommunityPopular
perminder-klair
subwave-llm-bench

Benchmark and compare LLM models for SUB/WAVE's on-air calls — track picks, segments, listener requests, DJ scripts, banter, and programme beats — in both candidate-pool and agent modes, using controller/scripts/llm-bench (the matrix harness) or the legacy picker-only controller/scripts/picker-test.mjs. Use this skill whenever the user wants to assess, benchmark, compare, or test which LLM model to run the station on — phrases like "which model should I use", "benchmark the picker / the DJ / this model", "test these models", "is <model> good enough for the radio", "compare the ollama models", "will a small model work", "run llm-bench", "run picker-test", or when diagnosing slow/failing djAgentPick / djAgentSegment / generate* calls and the model choice is suspect. Trigger it even if the user doesn't name a harness — any request to evaluate model reliability or choose a model for SUB/WAVE belongs here. This skill only measures and recommends; it does NOT change the live station's configured model.

Overview

Publisherperminder-klair
Repositorysubwave
Skill namesubwave-llm-bench
Stars
1.4K
Forks
122
Bundled files
1
LicenseMIT
Links
  • Markdown instructions

    A SKILL.md file the model loads on demand, so it only costs tokens when a request actually matches.

  • Works with any LLM

    AI skills are plain Markdown, not provider-specific code, so this works with GPT, Claude, Gemini, Grok, or a local model.

  • 1 bundled files

    Scripts, templates, and references the model can read while it works. Files are read-only and never executed.

  • Open source

    Published by perminder-klair on GitHub. Read the source before you install it.

Installation

Install the Subwave Llm Bench AI skill in TypingMind to use it with any LLM, or drop it into another agent that reads SKILL.md.

1

Install in TypingMind

TypingMind installs a skill straight from its GitHub folder — it reads SKILL.md, bundles the resource files, and stores the result locally.

  1. Open the app and go to Plugins → Skills.
  2. Choose "Install from GitHub".
  3. Paste the skill folder URL below and confirm.
    https://github.com/perminder-klair/subwave/tree/develop/.claude/skills/subwave-llm-bench
  4. Enable the skill in any chat where you want it available.
Plugins → Skills → Add skill → From GitHub URL, then paste the folder URL and press Continue.
2

Install in another agent

Any agent that reads the Agent Skills format can use this skill — copy the folder into that agent's skills directory.

Claude Code — .claude/skills
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/perminder-klair/subwave.git /tmp/subwave
mkdir -p .claude/skills
cp -r /tmp/subwave/.claude/skills/subwave-llm-bench .claude/skills/subwave-llm-bench
Restart Claude Code after copying so it picks up the new skill.

Use it in TypingMind

Enable Subwave Llm Bench in any TypingMind chat and the model takes it from there. Its name and description sit in the system prompt, and the moment a request matches, the model loads the full instructions itself — you never invoke it by hand, and it costs no tokens until it is actually used.

The model loads Subwave Llm Bench on its own as soon as a request matches it.

Works with any AI model

AI skills are plain Markdown instructions rather than provider-specific code, so Subwave Llm Bench is not tied to the model it was written for. Install it once in TypingMind and use it with GPT-5, Claude, Gemini, Grok, DeepSeek, Mistral, Llama, or a local model you run yourself — all on your own API keys.

  • Loaded only when it is needed

    The system prompt carries just the name and description. The instructions are fetched on the first matching request, so an idle skill costs nothing.

  • Switch models mid-chat

    Because the skill is instructions rather than code, changing model does not break it — the next model reads the same SKILL.md.

Skill instructions

This is the SKILL.md content the model loads. Read it before installing — a skill is instructions your model will follow.

SUB/WAVE LLM model benchmark

Two harnesses, one job: measure how well a provider + model handles the station's real LLM calls before trusting it on air.

  • llm-bench (controller/scripts/llm-bench/, npm run llm-bench) — the primary harness. A matrix runner over every on-air call kind: pool picks (pickNextTrack), agent picks (djAgentPick), pool + agent segments (generateSegment / djAgentSegment), request matching (matchRequest / djAgentRequest), the free-text scripts (intro, link, station ID, hourly), banter, and the programme family (plan, beats, exchanges). Scores reliability + deterministic rule checks, prints a per-model comparison table, writes a diffable JSON report.
  • picker-test.mjs — the legacy picker-only deep-dive. Still useful for high-iteration picker runs comparable with historical results, and it has a bundled orchestration script (see the legacy section at the end).

Both import the live prompts and schemas from src/ (never copies), fake everything external (library, tools, weather/news data), and override provider/model only inside their own short-lived process — the live controller's configured model is never touched.

The two things that surprise people

  1. Routing matters as much as the model. The same model can pass through one provider and fail through another, because each @ai-sdk/* provider translates tools / structured output differently. Canonical case: deepseek-v4-flash scored 0/4 via the deepseek direct provider but 4/4 via openrouter. Always benchmark through the routing you'll actually deploy — "is model X good?" is the wrong question; "is provider+X good?" is the right one.
  2. The stress scenarios are where truth lives. Easy cells make every model look fine. The verdict cells are: djAgentPick/long-context (full prompt + tool loop), generateSegment/dull-weather (the model must decline to air — small models botch the silence encoding; a huge wall-clock here means the structured-output retry rescued a failed first attempt), and the multi-voice JSON kinds (generateBanter, generateProgrammeExchange).

When NOT to use this

  • Changing the live model — that's an admin Settings change, not this skill.
  • Diagnosing general runtime behaviour — subwave-log-analysis.
  • Starting/stopping the stack — subwave-control.

Running llm-bench

Runs on the host from a repo clone (it imports TS source via tsx; prod containers ship only compiled dist/). The running stack is not required — keys resolve from state/secrets.env and controller/.env automatically (existing env vars win). If a key exists only inside a prod container's env, copy it out first: export OPENROUTER_API_KEY=$(docker exec sub-wave-controller printenv OPENROUTER_API_KEY).

bash
cd <repo>/controller
npm run llm-bench -- \
  --models openrouter:google/gemma-4-31b-it,ollama:qwen3:8b \
  --iterations 3

Flags:

  • --models (required) — comma list of provider:model, split on the FIRST colon, so Ollama tags keep theirs (ollama:qwen3:8b). Providers: ollama | openai-compatible | anthropic | openai | google | deepseek | openrouter | requesty | gateway.
  • --kinds — groups (pick,segment,request,scripts,banter,programme) or exact kind names. Default: all.
  • --modes — pool,agent (default both). Mode-independent kinds run once either way. If the operator runs pool mode live (Agentic picker off), --modes pool is the honest benchmark — agent cells they'll never use just add noise and cost.
  • --iterations — per scenario. 1 to smoke, 3 to screen (default), 5+ to confirm a winner. Full matrix ≈ 32 scenario cells, so ~100 calls per model at 3 iterations.
  • --out — report path (default scripts/llm-bench/reports/<ts>.json, gitignored).

A full run takes many minutes (every call is a real model call, agent cells can take 45 s each). Run it in the background with a long timeout and don't poll; OLLAMA_URL=http://localhost:11434 translates the container-internal Ollama address for host runs.

Reading llm-bench results

Each run is ok, violation (call succeeded, named rule checks failed), or thrown (bucketed: no-object-generated, timeout, unreachable, thrown). The summary prints pass% + p50 latency per cell, then per-model histograms of rule failures and thrown buckets.

Judge in this order:

  1. Thrown rate — a model that can't produce the schema at all is out. no-object-generated on structured kinds = weak structured output; everything landing at ~45 s = too slow for the loop, not incapable. unreachable = provider/config problem, not the model — fix and re-run.
  2. Violations — the named rules tell you the failure character: hallucinated-id (invents track ids — dangerous), banned-phrase:* / stage-direction:* / wrapping-quotes (would be read aloud by TTS), digits-in-spoken-time / clock-leak (hourly/link discipline), opener-repeat (ignores anti-repeat lists), unusable-exchange / single-voice (can't hold multi-voice JSON), variety:same-artist (editorial-pressure miss — informative, not disqualifying).
  3. Latency — p50 per cell; a pick has a whole track of slack so even 20 s works, but segments and links air sooner. Watch for retry-rescued cells (pass with 100×-median wall clock).
  4. Pool vs agent gap — a model that's clean in pool cells but falls apart in agent cells is a "candidate pool" model; that's a valid deployment, just say so in the recommendation.

Reports are JSON with every run record — keep old ones to diff a model across prompt changes or across model updates.

Producing the recommendation

  1. A compact table: one row per provider+model, columns for thrown rate, violation rate, p50 latency, and the dominant failure.
  2. A clear call naming the best provider + model + mode ("gemma via OpenRouter, pool mode — clean structured output, agent cells time out").
  3. Call out disqualifiers and deferrals (5xx throughout = re-test later).

Do not apply the change. The operator sets llm.provider + llm.model (and the Agentic picker toggle) in admin Settings — those are global, their call.

Legacy: picker-test.mjs deep-dive

For picker-only, high-iteration runs comparable with historical results:

bash
# DEV stack (src bind-mounted in container):
docker exec sub-wave-controller npx tsx scripts/picker-test.mjs <provider> <model> [iterations] [short|long]
# Host (works regardless of stack):
( cd <repo>/controller && STATE_DIR=<repo>/state OLLAMA_URL=http://localhost:11434 \
  npx tsx scripts/picker-test.mjs <provider> <model> [iterations] [short|long] )

long is the verdict mode (realistic session window); short is a sanity check. The bundled scripts/assess-models.sh (in this skill's directory) runs one or more models in both modes, auto-detects dev/prod, and summarises event- log failures: assess-models.sh <provider> [iterations] <model>... — with ollama and no models it discovers and tests everything installed.

Failure strings glossary (from the event log, kind: pickerTest):

  • agent did not call the done tool before stopping — model ignored the tool protocol. Check routing before rejecting the model (see surprise #1).
  • Every failure at ~agentTimeoutMs (45000) with tools=0 — a latency failure, not incapability; the deadline aborted it mid-loop.
  • Failed after N attempts … Internal Server Error — provider outage; re-run later, don't reject the model on this.
  • hallucinated-id / no-object-generated — weak structured output.

Cross-check live behaviour in /admin/debug → llm.recentCalls: the via field shows which path produced each result (ai-sdk:agent:native = clean native path; …:recovery = rescued by the done-tool recovery; a thrown djAgentPick falls back to the pool picker, so the station never goes silent).

Notes

  • Both harnesses append telemetry rows to the controller event log (state/logs/events-*.jsonl) and, if LLM_DEBUG_RAW is on, raw request bodies to state/logs/llm-debug.log. Harmless, filterable.
  • The docs page mapping every call kind to its code lives at docs/llm-calls.md; the harness design spec at docs/superpowers/specs/2026-07-09-llm-bench-design.md.

Bundled files

The model reads these on demand while the skill is loaded. They are exposed as readable files and are never executed.

Frequently asked questions

What does the Subwave Llm Bench AI skill do?

Benchmark and compare LLM models for SUB/WAVE's on-air calls — track picks, segments, listener requests, DJ scripts, banter, and programme beats — in both candidate-pool and agent modes, using controller/scripts/llm-bench (the matrix harness) or the legacy picker-only controller/scripts/picker-test.mjs. Use this skill whenever the user wants to assess, benchmark, compare, or test which LLM model to run the station on — phrases like "which model should I use", "benchmark the picker / the DJ / this model", "test these models", "is <model> good enough for the radio", "compare the ollama models...

Why use Subwave Llm Bench on TypingMind?

Because you install it once and use it with any model. Subwave Llm Bench is plain Markdown rather than provider-specific code, so the same skill runs on GPT-5, Claude, Gemini, Grok, or a local model — and you can switch model mid-chat without it breaking. TypingMind runs on your own API keys, so you pay providers directly instead of a per-seat subscription, and your skills and chats stay in your own storage.

How do I install Subwave Llm Bench in TypingMind?

Open Plugins → Skills → Install from GitHub in TypingMind and paste https://github.com/perminder-klair/subwave/tree/develop/.claude/skills/subwave-llm-bench. TypingMind reads its SKILL.md and bundles its files and installs it as a skill you can enable per chat.

Which AI models can use Subwave Llm Bench?

Any model you connect in TypingMind. AI skills are plain Markdown instructions rather than provider-specific code, so GPT, Claude, Gemini, Grok, and local models can all load this skill when a request matches it.

How many AI models can I use with Subwave Llm Bench?

As many as you like. As long as a model supports skills, you can use Subwave Llm Bench with it — GPT, Claude, Gemini, Grok, DeepSeek, Mistral, Llama and more — all on TypingMind with your own API keys.

Is the Subwave Llm Bench AI skill free?

Yes. It is published on GitHub by perminder-klair under the MIT license. You only pay your own AI provider for the tokens you use.

What are AI skills?

An AI skill is a reusable instruction bundle that teaches an AI model how to do one specific task. It follows the open Agent Skills format: a SKILL.md file with a name and description, plus any scripts, templates or reference files the model may need. The model reads the instructions only when your request matches the skill, so an installed skill costs nothing until it is used.

How are AI skills different from plugins or MCP servers?

A plugin or MCP server gives a model new tools to call — code that runs somewhere and returns a result. An AI skill gives the model knowledge and process instead: how to approach a task, which steps to follow, what good output looks like. Skills are plain Markdown, so they need no server, no API key and no runtime, and they work with any model.

View all

Set up your own AI workspace now

Get notified about new features and future giveaways by subscribing to our newsletter 👇