Nav Triz

Navigator TRIZ Skill

Navigator finds a solution fast. This skill exists for the minority of tasks where the first fitting idea is a compromise: improving one thing worsens another. It forces three genuinely different candidates onto the table before PLAN picks one, then records the resolution so the next session can find it.

When This Fires (and when it must not)

Fires when either:

• The user asks for it: "find a better solution for X", "alternatives for X", "resolve the contradiction", "triz this".
• A nav-brief Contradict row is not none AND the task is substantial (Task Mode complexity ≥ 0.5, or touching more than one subsystem).

Does NOT fire for routine work, a brief with Contradict none, "just do it" / "quick fix" passthroughs, or when the user already named the approach. Ceremony is the failure mode of this skill; when in doubt, skip it and say so in one line. (Resolved before: mem-060, mem-074 — new blocking behaviour ships opt-in, by condition.)

Protocol (one screen of output)

1. State the contradiction in one line, technical form ("improving A vs worsening B") or physical form ("X must be both A and not-A"). If you cannot, stop: there is no contradiction, proceed normally.
2. Ideal Final Result: what if the function existed with no new code? Name what would have to be true. If reachable, that is candidate 0 and usually the answer.
3. Reuse inventory: what already does ≥80% of this? path:line or none found.
4. Prior resolutions + principle prompts:

   bashCopy code
   PLUGIN_DIR="${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT:-$HOME/.claude/plugins/cache/navigator-marketplace/navigator}"
   [ -d "$PLUGIN_DIR" ] || PLUGIN_DIR="$HOME/.claude/plugins/marketplaces/navigator-marketplace"
   python3 "$PLUGIN_DIR/skills/nav-triz/functions/triz_suggest.py" \
     --contradiction "<improving A> vs <worsening B>"
   

   Prints decisions in this graph that resolved a related tension, then three principle prompts from different separation modes (generic trio if nothing matches). Read reference/PRINCIPLES.md only if a prompt is unclear.
5. Three candidates, one per prompt, in the table below. Each MUST name what it worsens. A candidate with no downside is a compromise misdescribed, or the IFR.
6. Recommend one with the reason in one sentence. Max one open question.
7. After the work, if the resolution was non-obvious, capture it:

   bashCopy code
   python3 "$PLUGIN_DIR/skills/nav-graph/functions/graph_manager.py" --action add-memory \
     --memory-type decision --summary "<what was chosen>" --concepts "<a,b>" \
     --contradiction "<A vs B>" --separation <time|space|condition|level> \
     --principle "<principle: concrete move>"
   

Output Template

Copy code
┌─ TRIZ: <short title> ─────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│ Contradiction  improving <A> vs worsening <B>                       │
│ IFR            <no-new-code version; reachable? yes/no>             │
│ Reuse          <path:line does X> | none found                      │
│ Prior          mem-NNN (<separation>) | none                        │
├───┬────────────┬───────────────────────────┬──────┬────────────────┤
│ # │ mode/prin. │ what changes              │ cost │ worsens        │
├───┼────────────┼───────────────────────────┼──────┼────────────────┤
│ 1 │ time / 10  │ ...                       │ S    │ ...            │
│ 2 │ cond / 15  │ ...                       │ M    │ ...            │
│ 3 │ level / 1  │ ...                       │ L    │ ...            │
├───┴────────────┴───────────────────────────┴──────┴────────────────┤
│ Recommend  #<n> — <one-sentence reason>                            │
└────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘
Open question (0-1): ...

Rules: three candidates, not five; different separation modes, not three variants of one move; each row's "worsens" cell is mandatory; total output fits one screen.

Hand-offs

• nav-brief → here when Contradict ≠ none on a substantial task. The brief's Approach cites the recommended candidate.
• navigator-research agent Phase 0.5 already produces IFR + reuse inventory; when it reports a contradiction, run this protocol in the main session (agents do not invoke skills).
• Task Mode RESEARCH phase lists this as the divergence step before PLAN.

Predefined Functions

functions/triz_suggest.py --contradiction "<A vs B>" [--graph-path P] [--limit 3] [--format text|json] Deterministic, stdlib, always exits 0. Keyword-ranks the ~20 mapped principles, picks one per separation mode first, pads with prior action / dynamization / segmentation, and lists prior decisions from the graph via query_contradictions.

Related

• reference/PRINCIPLES.md — separation modes + mapped principles (lazy-load)
• skills/nav-brief/SKILL.md — Contradict row
• skills/nav-graph/SKILL.md Step 3B — capturing tagged decisions