Handoff with ripwire
Nearest neighbours: • You need to UNDERSTAND the subsystem yourself first (not brief someone else) → ripwire-orient. • You need ONE symbol's full contract, not a whole-subsystem brief → ripwire-navigate (
--expand). • The recipient needs an architecture/layering read specifically → ripwire-layers.
Trigger: you're handing a subsystem to another agent or developer and want to give them a fast, accurate brief — not a wall of source code.
<dir> = repo root. SUBSYSTEM = the area in plain words (e.g. "ingest pipeline",
"graph ranking", "MCP server loop").
-
Task-relevant symbols —
ripwire <dir> --for="SUBSYSTEM" --top-k=20Output:<sigs>ranked by relevance. The top 10 are the symbols the recipient most needs to know. Note their file paths, complexity (cx=), and reuse count (in=). -
Expand the key symbols —
ripwire <dir> --expand=SYM1,SYM2,SYM3 --legend=compact(Pick the top 3 by rank from step 1.) Output: full bodies + callee signatures. This is the actual contract — paste it into the handoff verbatim rather than paraphrasing. Bodies are redacted by default — high-confidence credentials (API keys, tokens, connection strings) are masked before you see them, so pasting this straight into a handoff doc is safe as-is; pass--no-redactonly if you deliberately need the verbatim secret (e.g. auditing the credential-handling code itself). -
Design rationale —
ripwire <dir> --recall="SUBSYSTEM"Output: most relevant markdown docs (planning/design notes, READMEs) in full. Read and summarize the key decisions — why this design, not another. That's what the recipient most needs and least gets from reading code. Also checkripwire <dir> --notes --legend=compactfor this subsystem's symbols/files — any gotcha a prior agent already pinned (<note d="date">…</note>) surfaces automatically on the symbols step 1/2 emit; fold it into the brief instead of letting the recipient rediscover it. Before you hand off,--note-add="SYM_or_path: text"any trap you found yourself that isn't already written down — the cheapest thing you can leave the successor. If the same symbol has collected several notes across handoffs, that's a signal to graduate it out of prose entirely, into a--quality-ackreason or a standing--archdeny rule. -
Maintenance risk, scoped to the subsystem — point
--hotspotsstraight at the subsystem instead of filtering the whole-repo list:ripwire <subdir> --hotspots(verified: subdir scoping works, same as--dead-code=DIR). If the subsystem isn't a clean subdirectory, keep the repo root and--excludethe rest (repeatable flag) to fence the scan to just the area you're briefing on. Also worth a look:ripwire <dir> --hotspots --legend=compact(whole-repo, no scoping) to see whether any subsystem file also lands in the global top-10 — a file can be locally worst-in-subsystem and still unremarkable repo-wide, or vice versa; that distinction matters to the recipient. Tell them: "this file is gnarly — high churn, high complexity — be careful and run tests after any change here."
Calibration — what's fact vs framing here
- Steps 1–3 are direct reads (ranked signatures, full bodies, doc text) — trustworthy as far as the
underlying call graph goes (name-based edges; a symbol with high
amb=in--expand's<calls>block means some of ITS calls were ambiguous — don't present those as certain in the brief, flag them).--recallreturns doc text, not a verified fact — summarize what the docs claim, not what's provably still true; a stale design doc will still get picked up. - Step 4 (hotspots) is
churn × cognitive complexity— a maintenance-pain signal, not a defect count. Frame it to the recipient as "developers keep touching this, tread carefully," not "this file has bugs."
Stamp the commit you measured at — at="<sha>[+dirty]"
A brief is read hours or days later, against a HEAD that has moved. Every number you quote must carry the commit it was measured at, or the recipient cannot tell a stale finding from a live one.
Several repo-reading verbs now do this for you: the header carries at="<sha>", and at="<sha>+dirty"
when the working tree had uncommitted changes at measure time. Real output from this repo:
<quality-delta baseline="git-HEAD" regressions="0" … gating="0" at="f0a45e43d">
+dirty is the important half. A stamp ending in +dirty means the numbers describe a working tree
that exists on exactly one machine and is not recoverable from the sha — it is not reproducible by the
recipient. Either commit first and re-measure, or say so explicitly in the brief.
What actually carries a stamp today (verified by running each verb — do not assume it is universal):
| verb | stamp |
|---|---|
--quality-delta · --pr-context · --test-gate · --map-diff · --doc-drift | at="<sha>[+dirty]" |
--stray-content | head="<sha>" — different attribute name, and no +dirty suffix |
--situ · --cochange · --owners | none — record the sha yourself (git rev-parse --short HEAD) |
Two traps: the attribute is head= rather than at= on --stray-content, so a script grepping only for
at= silently gets nothing; and in --doc-drift the name at= is overloaded — the header at= is a
git sha, but each drift ROW's at= is a file path (at="src/mcp.h"). Anchor on the header, not the
first match.
Output
Handoff brief: (1) what the subsystem does in 2 sentences, (2) the 3 key entry-point symbols
with file:line and their signatures (from --expand), (3) the design decisions the recipient
must know (from --recall), (4) any hotspot files to be careful with, flagged if churn/complexity data
looks stale (no git history, non-git root). Aim for under 600 tokens.
Mid-task session handoff — --handoff
Handing off an INTERRUPTED WORKING SESSION (not a subsystem summary)? ripwire <dir> --handoff --legend=compact emits
the whole continuation packet in one deterministic call: a <verified> section (branch, HEAD sha with
+dirty marker, changed files + their symbols, transitive blast-radius size, tests-to-run) that is pure
disk truth, and a <heuristic> section (co-change partners not in the diff, committed --note-add
notes on the touched files, plan/design doc pointers ranked by a branch+commit-subject query) that is
labeled suggestion, never presented as fact. Composes with --token-budget=N — heuristic rows drop
tail-first and the header discloses withheld=; verified rows never drop. Single-root only; paste the
packet to the next agent as-is.

