Operations Review logo

Operations Review

Organization
runxhq
operations-review

Operate a project, workspace, or account from an agent or manager dashboard: inspect state, triage risks, prepare governed actions, route to the right skill lane, require approvals for consequential acts, and verify receipts after execution.

Overview

Publisherrunxhq
Repositoryrunx
Skill nameoperations-review
Stars
105
Forks
109
Bundled files
12
LicenseApache-2.0
Links
  • Markdown instructions

    A SKILL.md file the model loads on demand, so it only costs tokens when a request actually matches.

  • Works with any LLM

    AI skills are plain Markdown, not provider-specific code, so this works with GPT, Claude, Gemini, Grok, or a local model.

  • 12 bundled files

    Scripts, templates, and references the model can read while it works. Files are read-only and never executed.

  • Open source

    Published by runxhq on GitHub. Read the source before you install it.

Installation

Install the Operations Review AI skill in TypingMind to use it with any LLM, or drop it into another agent that reads SKILL.md.

1

Install in TypingMind

TypingMind installs a skill straight from its GitHub folder — it reads SKILL.md, bundles the resource files, and stores the result locally.

  1. Open the app and go to Plugins → Skills.
  2. Choose "Install from GitHub".
  3. Paste the skill folder URL below and confirm.
    https://github.com/runxhq/runx/tree/main/skills/operations-review
  4. Enable the skill in any chat where you want it available.
Plugins → Skills → Add skill → From GitHub URL, then paste the folder URL and press Continue.
2

Install in another agent

Any agent that reads the Agent Skills format can use this skill — copy the folder into that agent's skills directory.

Claude Code — .claude/skills
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/runxhq/runx.git /tmp/runx
mkdir -p .claude/skills
cp -r /tmp/runx/skills/operations-review .claude/skills/operations-review
Restart Claude Code after copying so it picks up the new skill.

Use it in TypingMind

Enable Operations Review in any TypingMind chat and the model takes it from there. Its name and description sit in the system prompt, and the moment a request matches, the model loads the full instructions itself — you never invoke it by hand, and it costs no tokens until it is actually used.

The model loads Operations Review on its own as soon as a request matches it.

Works with any AI model

AI skills are plain Markdown instructions rather than provider-specific code, so Operations Review is not tied to the model it was written for. Install it once in TypingMind and use it with GPT-5, Claude, Gemini, Grok, DeepSeek, Mistral, Llama, or a local model you run yourself — all on your own API keys.

  • Loaded only when it is needed

    The system prompt carries just the name and description. The instructions are fetched on the first matching request, so an idle skill costs nothing.

  • Switch models mid-chat

    Because the skill is instructions rather than code, changing model does not break it — the next model reads the same SKILL.md.

Skill instructions

This is the SKILL.md content the model loads. Read it before installing — a skill is instructions your model will follow.

Operations Review

Operate a project, workspace, or account from an agent-controlled desk.

This skill is the generic operations desk layer. It turns a state snapshot, an operator objective, and receipt-backed evidence into one safe ops desk packet: what is happening, what needs attention, what can be checked read-only, what requires approval, which governed lane should execute, and how success will be verified.

It is not the authority and it is not a second CLI. It does not replace domain skills from the registry (release, payments, board and thread products, and the like), provider-specific adapter skills, hosted API routes, repository workflows, or deploy commands. It routes to the existing interface with the smallest sufficient context and stops before any consequential act that lacks the right gate.

What this skill does

The default operate runner reviews an already-supplied snapshot. The explicit operate_from_projection runner can read a bounded product-owned projection before review. Neither owns the product state or a continuing work lifecycle. Both classify findings, rank the next action, select the governed lane, name blockers, write the approval prompt when a human decision is required, and states the receipt/effect/readback that will prove success.

It is useful before an action and after an action:

  • before action, it turns state into proposals and approval requests;
  • after action, it checks whether the expected receipt and projection appeared.

The model may diagnose and write the operator rationale. The mutation itself must be a deterministic handoff to an existing skill runner, CLI command, hosted API route, workflow, or provider tool.

When the desk should start from durable state, use operate_from_projection. That runner reads a projection through the store's projection.read first, then passes the projection as the dashboard snapshot. The storage provider is still selected by the logical data_source_uri; ops desk does not know whether state came from SQLite, Postgres, D1, Redis, or a product API.

When to use this skill

  • An operator asks an agent to manage a project, workspace, product, account, or other bounded operating surface.
  • A dashboard needs an agent-readable plan from the current projected state.
  • A runbook needs to decide between read-only checks, proposals, approval-gated actions, and post-action verification.
  • A product-specific operator skill needs a generic cockpit spine instead of inventing its own action model.
  • Runx needs to dogfood its own release, registry, hosted, receipt, or provider operations through the same governed lanes it exposes to users.

When not to use this skill

  • To execute a live mutation directly. Route to the named governed lane.
  • To duplicate a CLI command, release script, GitHub workflow, hosted endpoint, registry client, or provider SDK.
  • To bypass a human gate because the agent or UI believes the action is obvious.
  • To replace a domain skill from the registry, such as message-send or release, a payments lane, or a connector.
  • To operate from stale, missing, or unverifiable state while claiming readiness.
  • To put secrets, private keys, raw customer lists, or provider dumps into the ops desk packet.

Operating Model

The calling product owns this sequence:

text
snapshot -> findings -> proposals -> approval -> governed lane -> receipt -> projection

The manager dashboard and the agent must read the same state and emit the same action families. A button click and an agent plan are different interfaces over the same governed lane, not separate backdoors.

Delegation Model

Ops desk packets name existing execution surfaces; they do not implement them.

  • release owns release preparation, approval, publish handoff, and post-release verification.
  • receipt-query, receipt-audit, and run-history own proof questions.
  • message-send owns authority for live communications; branded provider skills and their connectors own provider-specific execution details.
  • pay, charge, refund, and invoice-pay own money movement.
  • Project skills own product vocabulary and product-specific actions.
  • CLI commands, hosted API routes, and GitHub workflows remain deterministic execution interfaces. The operator skill may cite them as handoff targets but must not clone their behavior in prose.

If no existing lane can perform the action cleanly, return needs_input or a product gap. Do not invent a private workaround.

Procedure

  1. Scope the objective.

    • Identify the workspace, project, account, surface, time window, and whether the ask is read-only, proposal-only, or execution-prep.
    • Read project_profile or operator_policy as context, not authority.
    • If the operating scope or objective is ambiguous, return needs_input.
  2. Classify state from evidence.

    • Use dashboard_snapshot, receipt_summary, effect_summary, and provider_status when present.
    • Treat missing evidence as missing. Do not infer success from UI state alone.
    • Separate health, money, communications, provider mutations, access, deployment, and incident signals.
    • For review, catalog, publication, bounty, or marketplace work, classify whether the artifact is real, useful, complete, and valuable. A reachable artifact with no credible user, maintainer, operator, public proof, or marketing value is not ready.
    • If using operate_from_projection, treat the read projection as the dashboard snapshot. An empty projection is not an error, but it should usually produce needs_input rather than fake readiness.
  3. Route to governed lanes.

    • Release questions route to release plus the project release profile and existing release workflow/commands.
    • Audit questions route to receipt-query, receipt-audit, run-history, or least-privilege.
    • Live communication routes through message-send and then the provider's connector.
    • Payment collection, payout, refund, chargeback, or target changes route to the matching payment lane.
    • Board, thread, and provider actions route to the product's own governed skill from the registry or a connector operation, such as code-intake or github-issue-to-pr.
    • Deploy and config changes route to the product-owned deploy lane.
  4. Decide gates.

    • Read-only checks: no human approval.
    • Drafts, dry-runs, previews, and reports: no live-action approval unless they expose private data or broaden authority.
    • Live sends, payouts, refunds, customer-visible posts, provider mutations, target changes, credential changes, deploys, destructive actions, and broad audience decisions: explicit approval required.
    • A review verdict, recommendation, or green dry-run is not payment approval. Money movement needs a separate approval prompt naming the amount, recipient, rail, target class, and verification receipt expected after settlement.
    • Missing approval means awaiting_approval, not "ready".
  5. Produce the ops desk packet.

    • Lead with the few issues an operator should act on now.
    • Name the exact lane for each proposed action.
    • Include the existing execution interface as a handoff, not as a duplicated implementation.
    • Include approval copy only when the operator could approve it safely.
    • Include verification steps that will prove the action happened.
  6. Stop cleanly.

    • Return needs_input for missing scope, objective, identity, authority, evidence, approval, or target.
    • Return refused for requests to bypass gates, hide material facts, leak secrets, spoof receipts, mark unsettled money as settled, or send without a principal/audience/content digest.

Edge cases and stop conditions

  • No project/workspace/account or objective: return needs_input; there is no safe operating frame.
  • No projection or receipt evidence: return needs_input or unknown status; do not convert silence into ok.
  • Requested action has unknown consequence: stop at needs_input with the missing lane/consequence classification.
  • Money, public send, deploy, credential, target, destructive, or provider mutation without approval: return awaiting_approval.
  • Approval text is too broad to approve safely: return needs_input with the exact missing amount, audience, target, network, provider, or effect.
  • User asks to skip a gate, hide a blocker, forge a receipt, or mark state settled without proof: return refused.

Reference Loading

Load only the reference needed for the objective:

  • Payments, payouts, refunds, payment rail adapters, reconciliation: references/payments.md
  • Email, campaigns, notifications, customer/public communication: references/communications.md
  • Receipt verification, ledger, trust roots, after-action proof: references/receipts.md
  • Provider health, deploys, webhooks, credentials, outages: references/providers.md
  • Manager dashboard state, projections, and action catalog design: references/dashboard.md
  • Delegation, project profiles, CLI/workflow handoff, and dogfooding rules: references/delegation.md

Outputs

The operate runners return one ops_desk_packet, the runx/operations-review.desk.v1 packet: the decision (ready, awaiting_approval, needs_input, no_action or refused), the scope, objective and mode, the dashboard state per area, evidence-backed findings, proposals with their consequence, approval, verification and execution lane, the ordered next steps, refusals, missing inputs and the success checkpoint. review-action returns the runx/operations-review.action_review.v1 packet.

The advance runner returns one dispatch_decision:

yaml
dispatch_decision:
  decision: dispatch | escalate | done
  reason: string
  dispatch:                 # present when decision == dispatch
    member: string          # a role from candidate_roster
    skill: string           # that role's roster skill, echoed
    task: string            # what the member should do
    needed_scope: [string]  # subset of the member's scope ceiling
    consequence: read_only | draft | live_mutation | money_movement | public_send | deploy
    verification:
      expected_receipt: string
      readback: string
  escalation:               # present when decision == escalate
    to: string              # a roster role or "human"
    trigger: string
    ask: string
    approval_prompt: string | null
  resolution:               # present when decision == done
    reason: string

Decision rules

  • Prefer one clear next action over a dashboard dump.
  • Never bury a required approval in prose; put it in approval_prompt.
  • Never expose tokens, API keys, raw customer lists, private wallet keys, or provider response dumps.
  • Never claim a state is settled, sent, deployed, paid, or refunded without a receipt/effect/readback reference.
  • Never route a public artifact, skill, bounty result, or docs deployment as ready when it lacks a credible real-world audience or durable public evidence.
  • Never widen authority because a dashboard widget would be convenient.
  • Never duplicate an existing CLI command, workflow, hosted endpoint, or domain skill in operator prose. Route to it.
  • Keep product-specific policy in product context. Keep this skill generic.

Inputs

  • objective (required): operator request, e.g. "check payments and unblock funding", "prepare a campaign send", or "review stuck receipts".
  • scope (required): the project, workspace, account, product, or bounded surface being operated.
  • dashboard_snapshot (optional): JSON summary of current projected state.
  • receipt_summary (optional): JSON or prose receipt/effect summary.
  • provider_status (optional): JSON or prose provider health/account state.
  • approval_context (optional): existing operator approvals, denials, or policy gates.
  • operator_policy (optional): project-specific constraints and lane names.
  • project_profile (optional): project topology, existing interfaces, and verification expectations. It is context, not authority.
  • requested_action (optional): preselected action lane or dashboard action id.

Worked example

Input: "Check payment readiness and tell me what to do next" with a dashboard snapshot showing healthy quote/readback state, three funded items, no unfunded approved items, and one rail adapter webhook status needs_review.

Output: decision: ready, money status ok, providers status needs_attention, one warning finding for rail webhook readiness, and one proposal routing to provider.webhook_check with no money movement. It does not propose marking anything funded, because no unfunded approved item is present and the latest funding receipt is already verified.

Agent task contracts

operations-review

Produce one runx/operations-review.desk.v1 for the requested project, workspace, account, or product objective. Treat dashboard_snapshot, receipt_summary, provider_status, approval_context, operator_policy, and project_profile as evidence, not as authority. Classify health, money, communications, providers, receipts, access, release, registry, and deploy state; rank the smallest useful next action; route every proposal to a named governed lane resolved from the registry: release, ledger, payments, provider send and health checks, deploy checks, or the product's own skill. For each consequential proposal include an execution handoff naming the existing skill, CLI command, hosted API, workflow, provider tool, or manual gate that should execute it; never duplicate that implementation in operator prose. Read-only checks do not need approval. Live sends, payouts, refunds, public/provider mutations, target changes, credential changes, deploys, release publishes, destructive actions, and broad audience decisions must stop at awaiting_approval until the actual execution owner resolves its native approval gate. approval_context is evidence for review, never a grant. Never expose secrets, raw customer lists, wallet private keys, tokens, or provider dumps. Never claim settled, sent, paid, refunded, deployed, released, or fixed without a receipt, effect, or provider readback expectation. Return needs_input for missing scope/objective/evidence/authority/approval or missing execution lane; return refused for gate bypass, forged proof, secret leakage, or hidden private workarounds.

operations-review-action-review

Review one proposed ops desk action. Classify its consequence, approval requirement, blockers, and verification evidence. If the proposal moves money, sends publicly, mutates a provider, changes targets or credentials, deploys, publishes a release, deletes, or broadens authority, require explicit approval. Require an execution handoff that names an existing skill, CLI command, hosted API, workflow, provider tool, or manual gate; do not accept bespoke operator-prose implementations. Return ready only when the action packet is sufficiently bounded and the evidence and execution route are present. Ready means reviewable, not authorized to execute. Return awaiting_approval when the action is well-bounded but approval is missing. Return needs_input for missing target, amount, audience, principal, receipt/effect, lane, or execution handoff. Return refused for gate bypass, forged state, secret leakage, or hidden private workarounds.

State and continuation ownership

This is one bounded review. The calling product supplies its current work and state, or selects the explicit read adapter. Fieldwork and other host products own continuing objectives, assignments, schedules and recovery. A proposal is not an approval, and a caller-supplied approval record cannot authorize a Runx act. The named execution owner checks actual grants, policy and approval and returns its own receipt. Pass that evidence into a later review without repeating the effect. For roster-based assignment preparation use team-delegate; it returns proposals without storing a second work lifecycle.

Bundled files

The model reads these on demand while the skill is loaded. They are exposed as readable files and are never executed.

Frequently asked questions

What does the Operations Review AI skill do?

Operate a project, workspace, or account from an agent or manager dashboard: inspect state, triage risks, prepare governed actions, route to the right skill lane, require approvals for consequential acts, and verify receipts after execution.

Why use Operations Review on TypingMind?

Because you install it once and use it with any model. Operations Review is plain Markdown rather than provider-specific code, so the same skill runs on GPT-5, Claude, Gemini, Grok, or a local model — and you can switch model mid-chat without it breaking. TypingMind runs on your own API keys, so you pay providers directly instead of a per-seat subscription, and your skills and chats stay in your own storage.

How do I install Operations Review in TypingMind?

Open Plugins → Skills → Install from GitHub in TypingMind and paste https://github.com/runxhq/runx/tree/main/skills/operations-review. TypingMind reads its SKILL.md and bundles its files and installs it as a skill you can enable per chat.

Which AI models can use Operations Review?

Any model you connect in TypingMind. AI skills are plain Markdown instructions rather than provider-specific code, so GPT, Claude, Gemini, Grok, and local models can all load this skill when a request matches it.

How many AI models can I use with Operations Review?

As many as you like. As long as a model supports skills, you can use Operations Review with it — GPT, Claude, Gemini, Grok, DeepSeek, Mistral, Llama and more — all on TypingMind with your own API keys.

Is the Operations Review AI skill free?

Yes. It is published on GitHub by runxhq under the Apache-2.0 license. You only pay your own AI provider for the tokens you use.

What are AI skills?

An AI skill is a reusable instruction bundle that teaches an AI model how to do one specific task. It follows the open Agent Skills format: a SKILL.md file with a name and description, plus any scripts, templates or reference files the model may need. The model reads the instructions only when your request matches the skill, so an installed skill costs nothing until it is used.

How are AI skills different from plugins or MCP servers?

A plugin or MCP server gives a model new tools to call — code that runs somewhere and returns a result. An AI skill gives the model knowledge and process instead: how to approach a task, which steps to follow, what good output looks like. Skills are plain Markdown, so they need no server, no API key and no runtime, and they work with any model.

View all

Set up your own AI workspace now

Get notified about new features and future giveaways by subscribing to our newsletter 👇