Minutes Lint

/minutes-lint

Run a consistency check across policy-authorized normal meetings to find decision conflicts and stale commitments. Restricted meetings are excluded from this agent workflow by default and must never be described as absent evidence.

How to run the lint

1. Run the consistency check:

   bashCopy code
   minutes consistency --stale-after-days 14
   

   Optional filters:

   • --owner <name> — limit to commitments assigned to a specific person
   • --stale-after-days <N> — change the staleness threshold (default: 7)

2. Parse the JSON output and present it as readable markdown.

Formatting the report

Decision Conflicts

For each conflict, show:

Copy code
**Topic: {topic}**
- Latest: "{latest decision text}" — *{meeting title}* ({date})
- Prior: "{prior decision text}" — *{meeting title}* ({date})
- **Status**: These decisions may contradict each other.

Frontmatter v2: resolved supersessions. When the resolution field is present on a conflict, the newer decision has a supersedes: entry in its frontmatter. Treat this as informational, not a red flag. Format as:

Copy code
**Topic: {topic}** ✓ Resolved
- Current: "{latest decision text}" — *{meeting title}* ({date})
- Superseded: "{prior decision text}" — *{meeting title}* ({date})
- **Status**: {resolution text}

If the latest decision also carries an authority field (high/medium/low), surface it next to the title. Authority is optional — when absent, omit the tag.

Stale Commitments

For each stale item, show:

Copy code
- [ ] **@{who}**: {task} (due {due_date}, {age_days} days overdue)
  - Last discussed: *{meeting title}* ({date})

Clean bill of health

If no conflicts and no stale commitments, say: "No decision conflicts or stale commitments found across your meetings. Everything looks consistent."

When to suggest next steps

• If there are decision conflicts: suggest running /minutes-debrief on the most recent conflicting meeting, or /minutes-search "{topic}" to review the full decision history
• If there are stale commitments: suggest the user update the action item status in the meeting file, or bring it up in the next meeting with that person
• Relationship-graph commitments come from minutes commitments --json; treat a nonzero exit as unavailable, never empty

Gotchas

• The consistency check reads live Markdown — it uses stable source snapshots, not a durable graph cache. If a result looks wrong, inspect and correct the referenced meeting source; do not suggest deleting or rebuilding graph.db (it does not exist)
• Stale != forgotten — some action items are intentionally deferred. Don't alarm the user; present the data and let them decide
• Decision conflicts are topic-based — two meetings discussing "pricing" with different conclusions will flag, even if the later decision intentionally superseded the earlier one. Context matters.