LinkedIn Post Writer
LinkedIn is its own game, and posts written like generic social captions underperform on it. The algorithm rewards two things above all — dwell time (how long people actually spend on the post) and early, meaningful comments — and the format has its own rules: the "…see more" hook, whitespace that makes long posts readable, links that suppress reach, and personal voices that beat company pages.
Two commitments shape every post here:
- Earn the read, then earn the comment. Write the opening to win the "…see more" tap, format the body so people actually read it (dwell), and close in a way that invites a real comment.
- Substance over LinkedIn theatre. The platform is full of broetry and "Agree? 👇"
engagement bait — which both the algorithm and credible professionals increasingly punish.
This skill does what genuinely works and refuses the cringe. See
references/avoiding-cringe.md.
Step 0 — Read the foundation first
Load brand-profile.md and voice.md (and audience.md for the professional segment). The
LinkedIn register is usually a notch more authority-leaning than other platforms, but still human
and first-person. Carry guardrails and any compliance rules.
Step 1 — Lock the idea, goal, and who's posting
- One idea — the single point, story, or insight.
- Goal — authority, leads/warming, comments, or reach (shapes the close).
- Person vs company — personal/founder profiles consistently out-reach company pages and read
as more trustworthy. Recommend a personal voice for thought leadership; reserve the company
page for announcements/brand. (See
references/linkedin-mechanics.md; the page's own strategy lives inlinkedin-company-pages.)
Step 2 — Write the "see more" hook
Use hook-writer. The first line (~140 chars on mobile before "…see more") must earn the expand —
that tap is the first dwell signal, and without it the post is invisible. Front-load tension; no
warm-up, no "I'm excited to announce."
Step 3 — Structure for dwell
Pick a LinkedIn format (personal-story→lesson, contrarian/POV, how-to, case study,
observation — see references/post-formats.md), then format for readability: short sentences,
one-to-two-line paragraphs, generous whitespace, a clear build. A wall of text kills dwell.
(Whitespace as genuine readability — not the broetry gimmick of one dramatic fragment per line.)
Step 4 — Write the body
Deliver the value or story the hook promised, in the brand voice at a LinkedIn register. Long is fine if it earns the read (limit ~3,000 chars) — every line must pull to the next. Don't pad; don't bait-and-switch the hook.
Step 5 — Close for comments + one soft CTA
End with a genuine discussion question the audience can't help answering — relevant to their work, easy but interesting, not "Agree?". Early comments drive reach, and the author replying to them boosts it further. Add at most one soft CTA (follow for more, a resource) — LinkedIn isn't the place to hard-sell.
Step 6 — Mechanics
- Links: external links in the body suppress reach. Put the link in the first comment and
say "link in comments," or post link-free. Native content wins. See
references/linkedin-mechanics.md. - Hashtags: 3–5 relevant, at the end.
- Format options: a document/PDF carousel is a high-dwell, high-save LinkedIn power format
— if the idea suits it, write the post copy and hand the slides to
carousel-writer. - AI disclosure: disclose AI-generated media/posts per the brand's compliance rules.
Deliver options, recommend one
Give 2–3 distinct posts (different angles or formats), then recommend one with a one-line reason tied to the goal.
Quality bar — self-check
- Does the first line win the "…see more" tap within the cutoff?
- Is the body formatted for dwell (whitespace, scannable) and genuinely worth reading?
- Does it sound like them at a LinkedIn register (voice + "never" list)?
- Does it close on a real question that invites comments, with one soft CTA?
- Are links routed to comments, hashtags sensible, format native?
- Is it free of cringe — no broetry, no engagement bait, no fake vulnerability?
- Would you be comfortable if a respected peer read it?
Edge cases & pushback
- User asks for engagement bait ("write a 'comment YES' post," broetry, a fake-emotional
story) → decline that approach and offer the genuine alternative that actually performs and
protects credibility. (
references/avoiding-cringe.md.) - Idea is really a one-liner → a short, sharp LinkedIn post or a poll can beat a forced essay; say so.
- Company announcement → can run from the page, but suggest a personal founder/employee post alongside for reach.
- Regulated/sensitive → carry compliance guardrails; no unverifiable claims; required disclaimers.
- Hard-sell request → reframe toward value-first; LinkedIn punishes overt selling.
- No real story/insight → don't manufacture a fake parable; sharpen the actual point or pick a format that fits what's true.
Related skills
brand-profile,voice-builder,audience-research— voice, register, professional audience.hook-writer— the "see more" opening line.caption-writer— general captions;thread-writer— X threads;carousel-writer— the slides for a document-carousel post.linkedin-growth— the personal-profile growth system (cadence, commenting, the golden hour);linkedin-company-pages— the company-page strategy. This skill stays on the single post.scheduling-and-queue— schedule the finished post.
References
references/linkedin-mechanics.md— dwell, comments, the see-more cutoff, links, formats, personal-vs-company.references/post-formats.md— LinkedIn post structures and the comment-driven close.references/avoiding-cringe.md— what NOT to do (broetry, engagement bait) and what works instead.references/examples.md— worked LinkedIn posts, formatted for dwell, vs a cringe version.
