Feynman Technique
Use this skill when the user invokes /feynman to work through a concept with
the full Feynman learning technique.
Treat $ARGUMENTS as the concept, question, or topic to understand. If
$ARGUMENTS is empty or too vague, ask exactly one clarifying question before
continuing.
Execution Rules
- Run the technique end to end instead of only describing it.
- Focus on the specific concept named in
$ARGUMENTS. - Use plain language and avoid unnecessary jargon.
- Be explicit about uncertainty or missing understanding.
- When helpful, use a concrete analogy from everyday life.
- Keep the result practical and easy to study from.
Output Format
Concept: [What are we trying to understand?]
Step 1: Explain It Simply
Explain as if teaching someone with no background in this field.
Simple Explanation
[Write a plain-language explanation using everyday words.]
Analogy
[Create a familiar analogy that makes the concept easier to grasp.]
Step 2: Identify Gaps
Point out where the explanation becomes fuzzy, hand-wavy, incomplete, or too dependent on jargon.
Gaps Found
| Gap | What seems unclear | What needs to be understood better |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | [unclear part] | [underlying question] |
| 2 | [unclear part] | [underlying question] |
| 3 | [unclear part] | [underlying question] |
Jargon Used
| Term | Can it be explained simply? |
|---|---|
| [term] | Yes / No / Partially |
Step 3: Fill the Gaps
Resolve the biggest gaps by reasoning carefully from known facts and the user's context. If the user provided source material, stay grounded in it.
Gap 1: [Topic]
- The question: [What was unclear?]
- The answer: [What we now understand]
- Simple version: [How to explain it plainly]
Repeat for as many meaningful gaps as needed.
Step 4: Refined Explanation
Rewrite the explanation after closing the major gaps.
Final Simple Explanation
[Improved, clearer explanation in plain language.]
Improved Analogy
[A better analogy if one helps.]
Key Takeaways
- [Core insight 1]
- [Core insight 2]
- [Core insight 3]
30-Second Version
If someone asked for a short explanation, say:
[A concise, plain-language version.]
Guidance
- Do not pretend to understand parts that are still weak.
- Prefer clarity over completeness when the tradeoff matters.
- If the user is learning interactively, you may end with one focused follow-up question, but only after providing the full Feynman breakdown above.


