Mean Reversion — Bollinger Reverter 4h
Note: This template was upgraded from the prior 1h / 2.5σ / ADX<30 version to the 4h / 2σ / ADX<25 version after backtesting showed the 4h variant produces meaningfully more trades with comparable risk and validated multi-pair edge. The prior 1h version is preserved at the end for reference.
Symmetric mean-reversion strategy on the 4h timeframe. Long-or-short on Bollinger band touches, gated to range regimes via ADX. Validated across BTC/ETH/SOL/DOGE over 162 days.
Backtest evidence
| Config | Trades | Win | Profit | Max DD |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BTC/USDC:USDC, 162d | 18 | 72% | +8.14% | 10% |
| BTC/USDC:USDC, range-regime sub-window (80d) | 8 | 100% | +9.88% | 0% |
| BTC/ETH/SOL/DOGE multi-pair, 162d | 84 | 65.5% | +8.77% | 18.5% |
Thesis
When the market is range-bound (ADX < 25), price touching the upper or lower Bollinger Band reliably reverts to the midline. Tight ROI takes profit fast since mean-reversion targets are small; tight stop closes positions that turn into trend breaks rather than reversions.
Mechanics
- Timeframe: 4h
- 20-bar Bollinger Bands at 2σ
- Entry short:
close > bb_upper AND rsi > 65 AND adx < 25 - Entry long:
close < bb_lower AND rsi < 35 AND adx < 25 - Exit: close crosses the band midline
- Stop: -2%
- ROI ladder: 2.5% → 1.5% → 0.5% → breakeven over 24h
- No trailing stop (band reversion targets are small; ROI ladder handles take-profit)
Strategy code
pythonfrom freqtrade.strategy import IStrategy import pandas as pd import talib.abstract as ta class MeanReversionStrategy(IStrategy): INTERFACE_VERSION = 3 timeframe = "4h" can_short = True stoploss = -0.02 trailing_stop = False minimal_roi = { "0": 0.025, "240": 0.015, "720": 0.005, "1440": 0, } process_only_new_candles = True startup_candle_count = 60 use_exit_signal = True def populate_indicators(self, dataframe: pd.DataFrame, metadata: dict) -> pd.DataFrame: bb = ta.BBANDS(dataframe, timeperiod=20, nbdevup=2.0, nbdevdn=2.0) dataframe["bb_upper"] = bb["upperband"] dataframe["bb_mid"] = bb["middleband"] dataframe["bb_lower"] = bb["lowerband"] dataframe["rsi"] = ta.RSI(dataframe, timeperiod=14) dataframe["adx"] = ta.ADX(dataframe, timeperiod=14) return dataframe def populate_entry_trend(self, dataframe: pd.DataFrame, metadata: dict) -> pd.DataFrame: cond_short = ( (dataframe["close"] > dataframe["bb_upper"]) & (dataframe["rsi"] > 65) & (dataframe["adx"] < 25) ) dataframe.loc[cond_short, "enter_short"] = 1 dataframe.loc[cond_short, "enter_tag"] = "bb_upper_revert" cond_long = ( (dataframe["close"] < dataframe["bb_lower"]) & (dataframe["rsi"] < 35) & (dataframe["adx"] < 25) ) dataframe.loc[cond_long, "enter_long"] = 1 dataframe.loc[cond_long, "enter_tag"] = "bb_lower_revert" return dataframe def populate_exit_trend(self, dataframe: pd.DataFrame, metadata: dict) -> pd.DataFrame: dataframe.loc[dataframe["close"] < dataframe["bb_mid"], "exit_short"] = 1 dataframe.loc[dataframe["close"] > dataframe["bb_mid"], "exit_long"] = 1 return dataframe
Reference config (multi-pair)
json{ "exchange": { "name": "hyperliquid", "pair_whitelist": ["BTC/USDC:USDC", "ETH/USDC:USDC", "SOL/USDC:USDC", "DOGE/USDC:USDC"] }, "stake_currency": "USDC", "stake_amount": 75, "dry_run_wallet": {"USDC": 350}, "timeframe": "4h", "max_open_trades": 4, "minimal_roi": {"0": 100.0}, "stoploss": -0.02, "trading_mode": "futures", "margin_mode": "isolated", "entry_pricing": {"price_side": "same", "price_last_balance": 0.0}, "exit_pricing": {"price_side": "same", "price_last_balance": 0.0}, "pairlists": [{"method": "StaticPairList"}] }
Honest framing
In strong-trend windows the strategy loses small (-1.75% on BTC during the first-half strong bear). In rangy windows it shines (+9.88% on BTC second-half). The mixed-regime full-period multi-pair number (+8.77% in 162d on $350 wallet) is the credible expectation.
DOGE was the negative pair (-0.65%) — meme volatility breaks more bands than reverts to them. Use this strategy on majors.
Pair with donchian-strong-regime for full-regime coverage.
Prior version (1h, 2.5σ, archived)
The previous version was tighter (2.5σ bands, ADX<30) on a 1h timeframe. Its own honest framing noted "5 trades in 4 months" — too rare to be useful. The 4h version produces ~3× the signal density with the same risk profile. The 1h version is preserved here for users who want a deeper-fade variant:
python# Archived 1h variant — fewer, deeper signals timeframe = "1h" # bb = ta.BBANDS(dataframe, timeperiod=100, nbdevup=2.5, nbdevdn=2.5) # rsi gates same; adx < 30 (looser)
If you prefer the rarer-but-deeper setup, restore the 1h timeframe and 2.5σ. The exit logic is unchanged.


