Strategy: Scalp · Momentum Bursts
When to use
A user asks for a scalping strategy, "fast in/out", "5m strategy", "ride the thrust", "buy when volume spikes". Single-pair, tight stops, time-stopped trades.
Honest framing
The reference backtest below was unprofitable (33% WR, −0.34% PnL, Sharpe −5.6) on SOL 5m over April 2026. The strategy executes correctly — it's not broken — it's just a losing parameter set on this window. The 0.6% target / 0.4% stop ratio needs ~41% hit rate to break even before fees, which the entry filter didn't deliver. Do not deploy as-is. Tune the entry threshold and validate before recommending to a user.
This skill exists as a structural template for high-turnover momentum entries. Real edge requires parameter search, regime filtering, or a different signal.
Backtest reference
| Window | SOL/USDC:USDC 5m, 2026-04-01 → 2026-05-01 (30 days) |
|---|---|
| Trades | 76 |
| Win rate | 33% |
| Wallet PnL | −0.34% |
| Sharpe | −5.6 |
| Backtest ID | 01kqypvbmjjhqjn3ae8bgqr9p0 |
Reference implementation
pythonfrom freqtrade.strategy import IStrategy from datetime import datetime import pandas as pd import talib.abstract as ta class SolScalpMomentumStrategy(IStrategy): minimal_roi = {"0": 0.006} # 0.6% profit target stoploss = -0.004 # 0.4% stop trailing_stop = False timeframe = "5m" process_only_new_candles = True startup_candle_count = 100 can_short = False def populate_indicators(self, dataframe: pd.DataFrame, metadata: dict) -> pd.DataFrame: # Session VWAP approximation over the last 288 bars (~24h). tp = (dataframe["high"] + dataframe["low"] + dataframe["close"]) / 3.0 pv = tp * dataframe["volume"] dataframe["vwap"] = pv.rolling(288).sum() / dataframe["volume"].rolling(288).sum() dataframe["rsi"] = ta.RSI(dataframe, timeperiod=14) dataframe["vol_avg20"] = dataframe["volume"].rolling(20).mean() dataframe["vol_thrust"] = dataframe["volume"] / dataframe["vol_avg20"] return dataframe def populate_entry_trend(self, dataframe: pd.DataFrame, metadata: dict) -> pd.DataFrame: dataframe.loc[ (dataframe["close"] > dataframe["vwap"]) & (dataframe["rsi"] > 70) & (dataframe["vol_thrust"] > 2.0), "enter_long", ] = 1 return dataframe def populate_exit_trend(self, dataframe: pd.DataFrame, metadata: dict) -> pd.DataFrame: dataframe.loc[(dataframe["rsi"] < 50), "exit_long"] = 1 return dataframe def custom_exit(self, pair: str, trade, current_time: datetime, current_rate: float, current_profit: float, **kwargs): # Time stop at 12 minutes (~3 bars on 5m). elapsed = (current_time - trade.open_date_utc).total_seconds() if elapsed >= 12 * 60: return "time_stop_12m" return None
Config requirements
json{ "exchange": { "name": "hyperliquid", "pair_whitelist": ["SOL/USDC:USDC"] }, "stake_currency": "USDC", "stake_amount": 100, "timeframe": "5m", "max_open_trades": 1, "stoploss": -0.004, "minimal_roi": { "0": 0.006 }, "trading_mode": "futures", "margin_mode": "cross", "entry_pricing": { "price_side": "same" }, "exit_pricing": { "price_side": "same" }, "pairlists": [{ "method": "StaticPairList" }] }
Tunable parameters
| Knob | Effect |
|---|---|
rsi > 70 | Stricter (> 80) → fewer entries, only the strongest thrusts. |
vol_thrust > 2.0 | Tighter (> 3.0) → only volume blowouts; very rare. |
0.006 ROI | Wider target → more time in trade, more tail risk. |
0.004 stop | Tighter stop → more stops out, lower per-trade loss. |
12 * 60 time stop | Faster timeout → more trades but lower edge per trade. |
Why this loses (and how to fix)
Three structural issues in the reference parameters:
- No regime filter: enters in chop AND in trend. Chop kills the 0.6% target before it hits.
- Entry on overbought + thrust: RSI > 70 plus high volume usually marks a local top, not a continuation. Inverting (
rsi < 30 + vol_thrust > 2.0) for a fade entry is worth testing. - Single pair: Scalping edges thin out on a single asset. Top-30 perp scan with
VolumePairListincreases hit count, lets the law of large numbers help.
Practical refinements before suggesting to a user:
- Add a higher-timeframe trend filter (
1h close > 1h ema_50). - Use ATR-scaled stops instead of fixed 0.4%.
- Test the inverted (mean-reversion-on-thrust) variant.
Common pitfalls
- Slippage eats the edge. A 0.6% target on a 5m candle leaves ~3 ticks of room. With Hyperliquid taker fee + slippage, effective edge is closer to 0.4% — barely above the stop. See
fees-optimizations. startup_candle_counttoo low. The 288-bar VWAP needs 288 bars of warmup; default 30 produces NaN VWAP for the first 24h.- Single-pair scalping is undercapitalized signal. 76 trades / 30 days is fine for statistics, not for an edge.
Sources
- Internal audit —
docs/standard-strategies-audit.md, backtest01kqypvbmjjhqjn3ae8bgqr9p0 - See
fees-optimizationsfor fee-aware sizing of tight-target strategies.


