Experiment Execution logo

Experiment Execution

Organization
TenureAI
experiment-execution

Execute AI/ML experiments locally or remotely with environment, runtime, and logging controls. Prefer invoking via research-workflow. TRIGGER when: user asks to run/launch/start/resume/monitor a training job, evaluation, or benchmark, or a plan is ready for execution, or experiment needs rerun/recovery. DO NOT TRIGGER when: research investigation only (use deep-research), planning without execution (use research-plan), or env setup without launch (use project-context).

Overview

PublisherTenureAI
RepositoryPhD-Zero
Skill nameexperiment-execution
Stars
53
Forks
4
Bundled files
3
LicenseMIT
Links
  • Markdown instructions

    A SKILL.md file the model loads on demand, so it only costs tokens when a request actually matches.

  • Works with any LLM

    AI skills are plain Markdown, not provider-specific code, so this works with GPT, Claude, Gemini, Grok, or a local model.

  • 3 bundled files

    Scripts, templates, and references the model can read while it works. Files are read-only and never executed.

  • Open source

    Published by TenureAI on GitHub. Read the source before you install it.

Installation

Install the Experiment Execution AI skill in TypingMind to use it with any LLM, or drop it into another agent that reads SKILL.md.

1

Install in TypingMind

TypingMind installs a skill straight from its GitHub folder — it reads SKILL.md, bundles the resource files, and stores the result locally.

  1. Open the app and go to Plugins → Skills.
  2. Choose "Install from GitHub".
  3. Paste the skill folder URL below and confirm.
    https://github.com/TenureAI/PhD-Zero/tree/main/.agents/skills/experiment-execution
  4. Enable the skill in any chat where you want it available.
Plugins → Skills → Add skill → From GitHub URL, then paste the folder URL and press Continue.
2

Install in another agent

Any agent that reads the Agent Skills format can use this skill — copy the folder into that agent's skills directory.

Claude Code — .claude/skills
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/TenureAI/PhD-Zero.git /tmp/PhD-Zero
mkdir -p .claude/skills
cp -r /tmp/PhD-Zero/.agents/skills/experiment-execution .claude/skills/experiment-execution
Restart Claude Code after copying so it picks up the new skill.

Use it in TypingMind

Enable Experiment Execution in any TypingMind chat and the model takes it from there. Its name and description sit in the system prompt, and the moment a request matches, the model loads the full instructions itself — you never invoke it by hand, and it costs no tokens until it is actually used.

The model loads Experiment Execution on its own as soon as a request matches it.

Works with any AI model

AI skills are plain Markdown instructions rather than provider-specific code, so Experiment Execution is not tied to the model it was written for. Install it once in TypingMind and use it with GPT-5, Claude, Gemini, Grok, DeepSeek, Mistral, Llama, or a local model you run yourself — all on your own API keys.

  • Loaded only when it is needed

    The system prompt carries just the name and description. The instructions are fetched on the first matching request, so an idle skill costs nothing.

  • Switch models mid-chat

    Because the skill is instructions rather than code, changing model does not break it — the next model reads the same SKILL.md.

Skill instructions

This is the SKILL.md content the model loads. Read it before installing — a skill is instructions your model will follow.

Experiment Execution

Mission

Run experiments safely, reproducibly, and mode-aware, with clear run paths and traceable evidence.

References

Read when needed:

  1. references/experiment-launch-checklist.md
  2. references/remote-info-template.md

Required Inputs

Collect minimum safe inputs:

  1. execution target (local|remote)
  2. local project root
  3. runtime project root (required when remote)
  4. single-node or multi-node
  5. proxy requirement
  6. tracker/login requirement

Ask only missing questions.

Run Path Policy

Use shared run_id from run-governor:

  1. control logs and stage reports: <codex-cwd>/logs/runs/<run_id>/
  2. experiment outputs: <runtime_project_root>/runs/<run_id>/
  3. project-context snapshots and secrets: <local_project_root>/.project_local/<project_slug>/

In local execution, runtime_project_root can be equal to local_project_root.

Mode-Aware Interaction

  1. full-auto: proceed without confirmation unless hard blocker or major safety risk.
  2. moderate: confirm before high-resource actions.
  3. detailed: confirm for unclear plans and high-resource actions.

Smoke Validation Policy

Use smoke validation only when needed:

  1. when launch details are incomplete
  2. when environment readiness is uncertain
  3. when cost/risk of full run is high

If setup is clear and safe, direct execution is allowed.

Execution Policy

  1. Confirm real execution vs dry-run.
  2. Confirm required inputs.
  3. Inspect scripts/configs/logs as needed.
  4. Resolve only blocking gaps.
  5. Launch smallest valid step first when uncertainty is high.
  6. Record commands, node assignments, log paths, run IDs.
  7. If the launched action is long-running, immediately enter watch mode instead of treating launch as completion.
  8. After each poll, continue with monitoring, diagnosis, recovery, or result collection; do not default to "job started, come back later."
  9. Replan on major failures.

Watch Mode Policy

Long-running experiment execution is an active responsibility, not a fire-and-forget step.

After launching a long-running job:

  1. stay in watch mode by default
  2. poll logs, checkpoints, scheduler state, or metrics on a model-chosen cadence
  3. after each poll:
    • if running, choose the next sleep interval and continue watching
    • if completed, inspect outputs and continue validation/analysis
    • if stalled, inspect evidence, retrieve memory, and attempt recovery or replan
    • if failed, diagnose immediately and attempt the smallest safe recovery
  4. ask the user only for hard blockers, major safety/resource approvals, or true decision points
  5. only allow explicit fire-and-forget behavior when the user clearly requested it

Watch-Loop Execution Template

Use this template after each experiment poll:

  1. read status, followup_action, progress_changed, and last_log_tail
  2. branch immediately:
    • continue-watch or wait-and-poll
      • choose the next sleep interval
      • keep monitoring
    • collect-results
      • inspect outputs, metrics, checkpoints, and artifacts
      • continue validation and analysis
    • diagnose-stall
      • inspect logs
      • retrieve procedure and episode
      • attempt the smallest safe recovery
    • diagnose-failure
      • inspect failure evidence
      • retrieve memory
      • attempt recovery or replan
    • replan
      • update route and continue execution
  3. write working state update before the next wait or recovery attempt
  4. do not stop at "job is still running" unless fire-and-forget was explicitly requested

Short Iterative Evaluation Loop

Short local edit-and-evaluate cycles must be handled as an owned execution loop, not as a one-shot task.

When the task is iterative optimization:

  1. compile an evaluation ladder:
    • baseline or previous-best reference
    • primary regression set
    • promotion gate for larger evaluation
    • final target evaluation
  2. prefer broader representative sets over a few hand-picked cases
  3. after each batch:
    • run the current gate set
    • compare score against baseline and best-so-far
    • inspect regressions, not just aggregate score
    • decide iterate, replan, or promote-to-next-gate
  4. if the new result is the best-so-far and the user requested preservation, snapshot the relevant prompt/config/code/results before the next risky change
  5. if the current gate is unmet, do not stop merely because one iteration completed cleanly
  6. only hand back to the user when:
    • compiled targets are met
    • a true hard blocker remains
    • a safety/resource gate requires approval

Unknown Error Branch

When execution fails with unknown error:

  1. local evidence triage (stack, logs, env, recent diffs)
  2. retrieve relevant procedure and episode memory
  3. targeted search
  4. deep research (debug-investigation) if unresolved
  5. apply smallest fix and validate

Retry behavior should be mode-aware and evidence-driven.

SSH and Remote Policy

  1. Choose control mode: direct SSH, SSH+session manager, scheduler, or existing remote agent.
  2. Declare remote model: remote-native or local-driver.
  3. Use remote profile reuse decision from run-governor; if missing, request exactly one confirmation via human-checkpoint.
  4. Validate connectivity and runtime basics before expensive launch when uncertainty exists.

Logging and Failure Handling

Record stable paths for:

  1. stdout/stderr
  2. checkpoints
  3. metrics
  4. artifacts

On failures, record owner and cleanup plan. On stalled jobs, record recovery attempt and next watch step.

Data Analysis Visualization Policy

When the deliverable includes data analysis results:

  1. run visualization analysis on the computed metrics/tables before final delivery
  2. save report-facing figures under <codex-cwd>/logs/runs/<run_id>/reports/figures/
  3. keep runtime-generated source figures under <runtime_project_root>/runs/<run_id>/artifacts/figures/
  4. include figure paths in stage reports and final summary
  5. prefer stable filenames such as <topic>-<metric>.png or <topic>-<metric>.svg

Stop Conditions

Do not launch full run when required inputs are still unknown and not explicitly waived.

In full-auto, continue only if risk is acceptable and no major safety issue exists. In full-auto, if remote profile is complete, reuse it by default unless explicitly overridden. For iterative optimization tasks, do not stop after a single batch while the active evaluation gate or non-regression guard is still unmet.

Output Contract

Emit execution state as:

yaml
run_id: <id>
mode: <full-auto|moderate|detailed>
execution_mode: <local|ssh|ssh+tmux|scheduler|remote-agent>
remote_model: <remote-native|local-driver|n/a>
local_project_root: <path>
runtime_project_root: <path>
output_path: <runtime_project_root>/runs/<run_id>
environment:
  python: <path/version>
  env: <conda/venv/module>
  proxy_needed: <yes|no|unknown>
tracking:
  mode: <wandb|files|mixed|unknown>
  run_id: <id|pending>
node_plan:
  master: <host|n/a>
  workers: <list|pending>
logs:
  stdout: <path>
  artifacts: <path>
analysis_artifacts:
  figures_report_root: <codex-cwd>/logs/runs/<run_id>/reports/figures
  figures_runtime_root: <runtime_project_root>/runs/<run_id>/artifacts/figures
  figures: <list of saved figure paths>
next_action: <smallest safe step>
checkpoint_needed: <yes|no>
goal_status:
  primary_target: <target>
  active_gate: <current threshold or eval set>
  best_so_far: <metric summary>
  done_allowed: <yes|no>

Bundled files

The model reads these on demand while the skill is loaded. They are exposed as readable files and are never executed.

Frequently asked questions

What does the Experiment Execution AI skill do?

Execute AI/ML experiments locally or remotely with environment, runtime, and logging controls. Prefer invoking via research-workflow. TRIGGER when: user asks to run/launch/start/resume/monitor a training job, evaluation, or benchmark, or a plan is ready for execution, or experiment needs rerun/recovery. DO NOT TRIGGER when: research investigation only (use deep-research), planning without execution (use research-plan), or env setup without launch (use project-context).

Why use Experiment Execution on TypingMind?

Because you install it once and use it with any model. Experiment Execution is plain Markdown rather than provider-specific code, so the same skill runs on GPT-5, Claude, Gemini, Grok, or a local model — and you can switch model mid-chat without it breaking. TypingMind runs on your own API keys, so you pay providers directly instead of a per-seat subscription, and your skills and chats stay in your own storage.

How do I install Experiment Execution in TypingMind?

Open Plugins → Skills → Install from GitHub in TypingMind and paste https://github.com/TenureAI/PhD-Zero/tree/main/.agents/skills/experiment-execution. TypingMind reads its SKILL.md and bundles its files and installs it as a skill you can enable per chat.

Which AI models can use Experiment Execution?

Any model you connect in TypingMind. AI skills are plain Markdown instructions rather than provider-specific code, so GPT, Claude, Gemini, Grok, and local models can all load this skill when a request matches it.

How many AI models can I use with Experiment Execution?

As many as you like. As long as a model supports skills, you can use Experiment Execution with it — GPT, Claude, Gemini, Grok, DeepSeek, Mistral, Llama and more — all on TypingMind with your own API keys.

Is the Experiment Execution AI skill free?

Yes. It is published on GitHub by TenureAI under the MIT license. You only pay your own AI provider for the tokens you use.

What are AI skills?

An AI skill is a reusable instruction bundle that teaches an AI model how to do one specific task. It follows the open Agent Skills format: a SKILL.md file with a name and description, plus any scripts, templates or reference files the model may need. The model reads the instructions only when your request matches the skill, so an installed skill costs nothing until it is used.

How are AI skills different from plugins or MCP servers?

A plugin or MCP server gives a model new tools to call — code that runs somewhere and returns a result. An AI skill gives the model knowledge and process instead: how to approach a task, which steps to follow, what good output looks like. Skills are plain Markdown, so they need no server, no API key and no runtime, and they work with any model.

View all

Set up your own AI workspace now

Get notified about new features and future giveaways by subscribing to our newsletter 👇