Design Harness

design-harness — the human adjudicates, the agent runs errands

Markdown is the single source of truth; the canvas HTML, every layer index, and the location registry are projections, rebuildable at any time. Judgment comes only from the human; you lay out options and evidence and run the errands — never adjudicate in the human's place.

Structure

Workspace layout

Copy code
<workspace>/
├── target.md             the human's acceptance criteria; source of the output form
├── logs.md               append-only change ledger (see "Disciplines · Ledger")
├── index.md              workspace entry point
├── sources/<type>/*.md   ① evidence: one source, one card
├── ideas/*.md            ② judgments (archive/ holds archived cards)
├── output/…              ③ assembly; internal structure set by the chosen output form
└── board/*.md            free surface: one file, one board

A host may hold many workspaces under any directory names; the sole registry is .design-harness/config.json at the host root — discovery trusts the registry, never the directory name.

Every layer also carries an index.md, grouped under tag headings (## TAG: one line on why they belong together), unclassified cards flat at the end after a --- divider and an unclassified marker. Search goes through the indexes; there is no classification layer.

Three layers + the free surface

1. sources/ — evidence. One source, one card, filed under sources/<type>/. The agent ingests and grades freely, and invents the type directories itself — no preset list; name them after what the source is (papers, github, podcasts, …), adding directories as needed. The directory name projects verbatim as the card's badge on the canvas.
2. ideas/ — judgments. Judgment comes only from the human: decision judgments the human voices in conversation are transcribed into idea cards automatically, and the human can simply ask for a card to be added; the agent transcribes, never invents. Two states: live (the file exists) and archived (moved into ideas/archive/, never deleted). A new idea repeating an old card's judgment merges automatically; a conflicting one puts both on the board for the human to pick.
3. output/ — assembly, the convergent layer. First assembly is human-initiated; its form comes from references/output-forms/ and the human's target.md. Ideas diverge, output converges: output changes only on the human's word (see "Workflow · Sync").

One free surface besides: board/ — the human's own boards, one markdown file per board (comparison matrices, theme grids, any scratch reasoning). No schema, no required fields — this freedom belongs to the human; edit only when asked ("lay these three sources out as a comparison").

Card schema and templates

• A card = frontmatter + title + summary. No fixed sections; references are inline links in the summary.
• ideas/ cards (including archive/): frontmatter requires id and type; tags and conflicts optional (see "Exactly three structured facts"). No status field — the file's existence is the live state, sitting under archive/ is the archived state.
• sources/ cards: frontmatter optional; when present only tags is read.
• board/ documents: no schema. The board is terminal: it may reference any layer, but sources/ideas/output must never reference the board — distill a board's conclusions into idea cards.

idea card template:

markdownCopy code
---
id: <kebab-slug, matching the filename>
type: idea
tags: [<at most one; omit the whole line>]
conflicts: [<ids of prior cards this judgment contends with; omit when none>]
---

# <the judgment in one sentence>

<Summary: what the judgment says and why; the evidence and prior cards it stands on as
inline links.>

source card template:

markdownCopy code
---
tags: [<at most one; the whole frontmatter may be omitted>]
---

# <source name + one-line characterization>

<Core content + relevance to this project; the original provenance (arXiv/URL/date/
authors) as inline links.>

target template:

markdownCopy code
# target — acceptance criteria for the output

## Purpose
(One paragraph: what this workspace decides, for whom, and where the boundaries are.)

## Current requirements
- (One checkable requirement per line.)

## Fulfilment map
- (Requirement → output file mapping, updated with each assembly.)

Exactly three structured facts

1. References — inline markdown links in the card body. Forward only: a link points at the evidence or prior cards this card stands on, never at supporters. "Who cites me" is a projection-derived backlink, never written down. Acyclic: mutual references mean the two cards should merge, or one edge is a mistakenly written backlink — delete it.
2. Tags — single level, at most one per card, optional. A card that truly belongs to two tags is two cards: split it. No tag just means unclassified. Tags may be proposed by the human or assigned by the agent.
3. Conflict — the optional conflicts: [<other card's id>] in the newer card's frontmatter, declaring a judgment conflict with prior cards (written on the new card only, acyclic, same direction as references). The field lives exactly as long as the conflict: the human's adjudication removes it — archive the loser and the edge vanishes with the card; rewrite in place and the entry is deleted. The indexes' pending-conflict annotations derive from this field.

Everything else — backlinks, distances, coordinates, clusters, index groupings — is derived and never enters the truth.

Rendering contract — the engine's minimum

Everything projection needs. This section is the engine; everything else in this file is methodology, freely reconfigurable per schema — one engine serves many thin schemas, a new scenario is a new schema configuration rather than a new engine; the contract binds files, and the CLI is only the first host.

• Four layer names: sources/ and ideas/ become canvas nodes, output/ and board/ become document panels. Paths containing an archive/ segment are excluded; index.md is excluded.
• Files are UTF-8 markdown.
• Frontmatter is optional; when present it must close (--- … ---).

Everything else degrades without breaking: no H1 → show the filename stem; no tag → the unclassified group; any source type directory → the name projects verbatim; unresolvable link → no edge. Silent data loss is a validator error, never waved through: markdown under an unknown top-level directory, or frontmatter opened but never closed, is INVALID.

Canvas — the only projection surface

The canvas is the human's main thinking surface and only a projection — it holds no facts and accepts no writes that bypass markdown. It doubles as the sharing surface: every card links back to its evidence, so handing someone the board hands them the reasoning behind the design. There is exactly one canvas — the unified canvas (template; its interaction contract lives in the workspace's canvas module doc) — and exactly one builder: the rules (truth-driven, edges = in-card references, layout derived from references + tags) are built in, and the workspace path is the only required input. Conflict edges render red — a template-base default every style pack inherits and may override.

Visual style is pure CSS, living entirely in the canvas/styles/ style pack; the template carries a single /*__CSS__*/ slot and no CSS of its own. The default build embeds the whole pack plus the top-right toolbar switcher — the human reskins live there (every open starts from the pin-and-paper native look); you only hint at the switcher once. --css canvas/styles/<slug>/canvas.css pins one style with no switcher — to name a slug, read canvas/styles/selection-index.json, never bulk-read the whole pack. Never fork the template or the builder for looks; when a style's design.md changes, recompile its canvas.css in the same change — the spec is the truth (the pack validator checks the dual palettes and bans external reach).

Workflow

0. Discover the workspace (the first step on every trigger). Order: a path the human gives > the .design-harness/config.json registry > the default docs/design-harness/. More than one candidate, or zero: ask — never initialize a new workspace silently (init in the wrong place forks the truth). The canvas path follows the same rule: whichever of the two locations the registry is missing — the workspace, or the "canvas" key — is asked as an option picker, one prompt when both are missing; canvas options are docs/canvas.html (keeps zero-workflow GitHub Pages open: that mode serves only / or /docs) and beside-the-workspace; record the choice under the registry's "canvas" key. Only the bootstrap writes the registry; on finding a workspace the registry missed, re-run the bootstrap to record it. A fresh bootstrap ends by asking the human for the target (purpose and acceptance criteria, in the human's words) — transcribe the answer into target.md, never invent one; the human may defer. Scripts run at the host project root (<skill-dir> is wherever this skill is installed):

   bashCopy code
   python3 <skill-dir>/scripts/discover_workspace.py          # prints which workspace resolves
   python3 <skill-dir>/scripts/init_workspace.py <workspace>  # bootstrap: skeleton + registry + both validators
   

1. Ingest evidence: file source cards, grade, anchor to provenance; source disagreements go on the board as-is.

2. Transcribe judgments: judgments the human voices in conversation transcribe into idea cards automatically; same-judgment cards merge automatically, conflicts go on the board for the human to pick; derive references and tag classification (one pass — both are relationship reads).

3. Sync (on the human's command, never automatic): idea → output re-derivation runs only when the human orders it — apply directly with a one-line receipt, a diff first for large changes; re-derive the affected elements, never rewrite the whole document. A human edit to output is itself an adjudication: back-transcribe it into idea cards automatically (transcription only). Target changes follow the same discipline as idea changes. When output lags you may hint once ("output is N ideas behind"), never twice.

4. Assemble: first assembly is human-initiated; the form comes from target.md + the output-forms library — when the human sets a target, recommend a form from the library; if target.md is still blank when assembly is called for, ask for the target once more before recommending; the first is system-design (mermaid diagrams are the markdown body itself, plus a modules/ layer, one module per file). Anchor every output claim to evidence; write principles as bullet lists, one principle per bullet — so each can be referenced, edited, and ledgered on its own; in the system-design form the diagram IS the markdown body: mermaid blocks carry click declarations into module files.

5. Project and deliver: whenever the truth changes, regenerate the touched layers' indexes, rebuild the canvas, and republish in the same turn; append the ledger.

   bashCopy code
   python3 <skill-dir>/scripts/build_canvas.py <workspace> -o <temp-dir> [--css …] [--title '…']
   

   Without <workspace> the tool discovers on its own (registry → default location) and refuses to act on ambiguity. -o takes a directory (the file lands inside as canvas.html) or a .html path written as-is. Build targets are the fixed canvas.html beside the workspace — commit it when the workspace lives in git, so whoever gets the repo gets the board — or a temp dir or artifact for throwaway views; the builder refuses to write inside the workspace either way. A build is not delivered until the human holds a clickable link. The product is one fully self-contained HTML file (all dependencies inlined, zero network requests). The default delivery is a published HTML link: publish as an artifact or the host's hosted pages (GitHub Pages recipe) and hand over that URL; in Claude Code (a local CLI session) a local link suffices — an absolute file://…/canvas.html URL or a local static server. Every rebuild reuses the existing link — mint a new one only when the human asks. So the link survives the session: record the delivery target — the HTML output path or the published link — under a "canvas" key in the .design-harness/config.json registry, and read it back before building; later sessions then rebuild the same file and republish the same link.

Teach in place, never lecture

• First contact (the workspace just bootstrapped, whether the skill fired passively or on demand): the first move is always to build the workspace, construct the initial canvas in the same turn, hand over the link, then orient in one sentence — "From now on every resource we look into files itself, and the decision judgments we talk through land on the board; you can also just ask me to change things, and tell me whenever you want the design assembled." Never repeat it.
• The workspace is young, no output yet: leave the assembly seat visibly empty — say once "output starts on the human's word".
• Ideas look mature: suggest assembly in one sentence; never push twice.
• The human asks for output too early: comply, deliver the honestly thin result, and say which ideas are missing — never refuse.
• First assembly: state the sync rule in one sentence ("from here output updates only when you order a sync; edit output directly and I back-transcribe it into ideas").
• Every sync: give a one-line receipt of what was re-derived or back-transcribed.

Disciplines

• The never list: never pick sides, never invent judgments, never archive an idea on your own, never initiate first assembly on your own, never touch output outside the human's command.

• Markdown first: change the truth first, then rebuild every affected projection (indexes, canvas HTML) in the same turn; never edit a projection directly. Projections hold no facts and rebuild wholesale from markdown — committing one (the shared canvas) never promotes it to truth, and a committed canvas rides in the same change as the truth edit that made it stale.

• The ledger: logs.md is append-only and covers both ideas and output. Every change, one line per touched layer:

  Copy code
  - YYYY-MM-DD · card or doc · action · delta (old → new) · reason
  

  Record the delta itself — the minimal old → new — not just the action and reason. When the workspace sits outside git, the ledger is the only way back.

• Validation: two validators — scripts/check_workspace.py and scripts/check_doc_links.py — run automatically at bootstrap and on every canvas build: failure exits nonzero, prints the full problem list, and produces no HTML; fix the truth, then rebuild. When this file's contract changes, the validators change in the same commit.

Toolbox

All live in <skill-dir>/scripts/ and run standalone; command syntax sits at the usage sites (workflow steps 0 and 5).

• init_workspace.py — bootstrap: skeleton (idempotent, never clobbers) + registry write + runs both validators itself.
• discover_workspace.py — read-only discovery, prints which workspace resolves; ambiguity is reported, never resolved silently.
• build_canvas.py — the only canvas build entry; runs both validators as a gate, then emits the self-contained HTML.
• check_workspace.py — schema validation: required frontmatter, single tag, conflicts targets, forward-only acyclic references, no inbound board references.
• check_doc_links.py — link integrity: no dangling links inside the workspace.
• check_style_pack.py — style pack validation: dual palettes, no external reach, tokens aligned to the template.