Investigating With Observability logo

Investigating With Observability

Organization
VictoriaMetrics
investigating-with-observability

Use when investigating issues, debugging problems for applications, or responding to alerts in the Kubernetes cluster using VictoriaMetrics, VictoriaLogs, or VictoriaTraces.

Overview

PublisherVictoriaMetrics
Repositoryskills
Skill nameinvestigating-with-observability
Stars
62
Forks
9
Bundled files
4
LicenseApache-2.0
Links
  • Markdown instructions

    A SKILL.md file the model loads on demand, so it only costs tokens when a request actually matches.

  • Works with any LLM

    AI skills are plain Markdown, not provider-specific code, so this works with GPT, Claude, Gemini, Grok, or a local model.

  • 4 bundled files

    Scripts, templates, and references the model can read while it works. Files are read-only and never executed.

  • Open source

    Published by VictoriaMetrics on GitHub. Read the source before you install it.

Installation

Install the Investigating With Observability AI skill in TypingMind to use it with any LLM, or drop it into another agent that reads SKILL.md.

1

Install in TypingMind

TypingMind installs a skill straight from its GitHub folder — it reads SKILL.md, bundles the resource files, and stores the result locally.

  1. Open the app and go to Plugins → Skills.
  2. Choose "Install from GitHub".
  3. Paste the skill folder URL below and confirm.
    https://github.com/VictoriaMetrics/skills/tree/main/plugins/diagnostics/skills/investigating-with-observability
  4. Enable the skill in any chat where you want it available.
Plugins → Skills → Add skill → From GitHub URL, then paste the folder URL and press Continue.
2

Install in another agent

Any agent that reads the Agent Skills format can use this skill — copy the folder into that agent's skills directory.

Claude Code — .claude/skills
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/VictoriaMetrics/skills.git /tmp/skills
mkdir -p .claude/skills
cp -r /tmp/skills/plugins/diagnostics/skills/investigating-with-observability .claude/skills/investigating-with-observability
Restart Claude Code after copying so it picks up the new skill.

Use it in TypingMind

Enable Investigating With Observability in any TypingMind chat and the model takes it from there. Its name and description sit in the system prompt, and the moment a request matches, the model loads the full instructions itself — you never invoke it by hand, and it costs no tokens until it is actually used.

The model loads Investigating With Observability on its own as soon as a request matches it.

Works with any AI model

AI skills are plain Markdown instructions rather than provider-specific code, so Investigating With Observability is not tied to the model it was written for. Install it once in TypingMind and use it with GPT-5, Claude, Gemini, Grok, DeepSeek, Mistral, Llama, or a local model you run yourself — all on your own API keys.

  • Loaded only when it is needed

    The system prompt carries just the name and description. The instructions are fetched on the first matching request, so an idle skill costs nothing.

  • Switch models mid-chat

    Because the skill is instructions rather than code, changing model does not break it — the next model reads the same SKILL.md.

Skill instructions

This is the SKILL.md content the model loads. Read it before installing — a skill is instructions your model will follow.

Troubleshooting with Observability Skills

Core Principle

Random querying wastes time and produces misleading results. Empty results from wrong metric names look identical to "no problem exists." Jumping between signals without a hypothesis leads to thrashing.

Discover before you query. Hypothesize before you correlate. Confirm before you conclude.

If you haven't completed Phase 1, you cannot propose root causes. If you haven't correlated across at least two signal types, your conclusion is a guess.

The Investigation Protocol

Complete each phase before proceeding to the next.

Phase 1: Gather Signals     → What's already known? What's alerting?
Phase 2: Discover and Scope  → What data exists? What are the real names?
Phase 3: Hypothesize and Test → Form one theory, query to confirm or refute
Phase 4: Correlate and Confirm → Cross-reference across signal types, find root cause

Phase 1: Gather Signals

Before writing any query, establish what's already known.

1. Check env var availability — run the gating check from the Subagent Dispatch section.

2. Dispatch signal-gathering subagents in parallel:

SubagentConditionWhat it does
AlertManager checkVM_ALERTMANAGER_URL availableChecks VM alerts + AlertManager alerts and silences
Metrics discovery (alerts only)VM_METRICS_URL available AND VM_ALERTMANAGER_URL NOT availableChecks VM alerts as fallback when AlertManager agent can't be dispatched

If VM_ALERTMANAGER_URL IS available, the AlertManager check agent handles BOTH VM alerts and AlertManager queries — no need to dispatch a separate metrics agent for alerts.

Read the agent prompt files and dispatch in a single Agent tool call. Include in each subagent's prompt:

  • The agent file content
  • The investigation target (namespace, service, or component name if known)

3. Synthesize results — once subagents return:

  • Combine alert findings from all sources
  • Establish a timeline: when did symptoms start? What changed?
  • If timeline is unclear, ask the user

4. Identify which signal type to start with:

SymptomStart withThen correlate with
Resource/rate issueMetricsLogs
Errors/crashesLogsMetrics
Latency/slow requestsTracesLogs
Alert firingMetrics (alert details)Logs + Traces

Phase 2: Discover and Scope

Never guess metric names, log field names, or service names. Discovery is not optional — it prevents the single most common investigation failure: drawing conclusions from empty results caused by wrong names.

Dispatch discovery subagents in parallel for ALL available backends. Read each agent prompt file and dispatch in a single Agent tool call. Include in each subagent's prompt:

  • The agent file content
  • Target namespace and/or service name (from Phase 1 findings)
  • Time range for the investigation (RFC3339 format)
  • Any specific keywords or components to search for
SubagentCondition
Metrics discoveryVM_METRICS_URL available
Logs discoveryVM_LOGS_URL available
Traces discoveryVM_TRACES_URL available

Synthesize discovery results:

  • Merge discovered names across all backends
  • Note which backends have data for the target and which don't
  • Identify the richest signal source for Phase 3 hypothesis testing

Consult skill references for complex queries. You do NOT know LogsQL syntax from training data — it is NOT Loki LogQL. For complex queries beyond what the subagents already ran, invoke the corresponding *-query skill or use the LogsQL Quick Reference below.

Phase 3: Hypothesize and Test

After discovery, form a specific hypothesis before querying further.

State it clearly: "I think [component X] is [failing/slow/OOM] because [evidence Y from Phase 1]."

Test minimally:

  • Query ONE thing to confirm or refute the hypothesis
  • Don't query everything at once — you'll drown in data
  • Use instant queries first (cheaper, faster) before range queries

If the hypothesis is wrong:

  • Don't add more queries on top — form a NEW hypothesis
  • Re-examine what Phase 1 and Phase 2 revealed
  • Ask: did discovery show anything unexpected?

After 3 failed hypotheses: STOP. Three wrong guesses means you're missing something fundamental. Either:

  • A key data source hasn't been discovered yet
  • The scope is wrong (different namespace, different service, different time range)
  • You need to ask the user for more context

Phase 4: Correlate and Confirm

A single signal type is not proof. Correlate across at least two before concluding.

Dispatch correlation subagents in parallel for the signal types you need. Reuse the same agent prompt files from agents/, but provide specific queries rather than discovery tasks. Include in each subagent's prompt:

  • The agent file content
  • The specific query to run (metric expression, log filter, trace search parameters)
  • The exact time range to query (narrowed from Phase 3 findings)
  • What to look for (the confirmed hypothesis from Phase 3)

Example parallel dispatch for correlation:

  • Metrics agent: "Query rate(http_requests_total{code=~'5..', namespace='myapp'}[5m]) from T1 to T2"
  • Logs agent: "Search {namespace='myapp'} error from T1 to T2, return sample messages"
  • Traces agent: "Search traces for service myapp with minDuration=1s from T1 to T2"

Correlation techniques:

  • Time-based: Identify anomaly timestamp in metrics, query logs/traces at that time
  • Trace ID: Find trace IDs in traces, search logs for trace_id:"<id>"
  • Pod name: Get pod name from metrics labels, use it in log stream filters

Only after correlation: propose root cause and remediation.

Red Flags — STOP and Return to Phase 1

If you catch yourself:

  • Proposing a root cause after querying only one signal type
  • Writing a LogsQL query from memory without checking syntax
  • Querying a metric name you haven't confirmed exists via discovery
  • Getting empty results and concluding "no problem"
  • Skipping the alerts check because "it's probably not that"
  • Running five different queries hoping one shows something
  • Saying "let me just try..." instead of forming a hypothesis

All of these mean: STOP. You're guessing, not investigating.

Common Rationalizations

ExcuseReality
"I know the metric name"Maybe. Discovery takes 2 seconds and prevents 20 minutes of chasing empty results.
"Alerts won't help here"Alerts are free to check and frequently contain the exact answer. Skip at your peril.
"Just need to check logs quickly"Quick log checks without discovery produce wrong field names and misleading results.
"Empty results = no problem"Empty results more often mean wrong query than absent problem. Verify names first.
"I'll correlate later"Single-signal conclusions are guesses. Correlate before claiming root cause.
"LogsQL is like LogQL/Elasticsearch"It's not. The syntax differences cause silent failures. Consult the reference.

Environment

Environment is controlled by env vars. Check current state:

bash
echo "VM_METRICS_URL:      $VM_METRICS_URL"
echo "VM_LOGS_URL:         $VM_LOGS_URL"
echo "VM_TRACES_URL:       $VM_TRACES_URL"
echo "VM_ALERTMANAGER_URL: $VM_ALERTMANAGER_URL"
echo "VM_CURL_CONFIG:      ${VM_CURL_CONFIG:-(unset - no auth)}"

If unsure which environment the application runs in, ask user.

Subagent Dispatch

This skill dispatches parallel subagents at phase boundaries to speed up investigations. Each subagent carries embedded API reference and returns structured findings.

Env Var Gating

Before each dispatch round, check which backends are available:

bash
echo "METRICS:${VM_METRICS_URL:+available}"
echo "LOGS:${VM_LOGS_URL:+available}"
echo "TRACES:${VM_TRACES_URL:+available}"
echo "ALERTMANAGER:${VM_ALERTMANAGER_URL:+available}"

Only dispatch subagents for backends that report available. Do not dispatch a subagent if its env var is empty or unset.

How to Dispatch

  1. Read the agent prompt file from the agents/ directory (relative to this skill's directory)
  2. Use the Agent tool to dispatch, including:
    • The agent prompt file content as the base instructions
    • Investigation context: target namespace, service name, time range (RFC3339)
    • Any specific queries or metrics to look for
  3. Dispatch independent subagents in the SAME tool-call message for parallel execution
  4. Set allowed-tools: Bash(curl:*), Bash(jq:*), Bash(date:*) on each subagent

Agent Files

AgentFileRequiresUsed in
AlertManager checkagents/alertmanager-check.mdVM_ALERTMANAGER_URL + VM_METRICS_URLPhase 1
Metrics discoveryagents/metrics-discovery.mdVM_METRICS_URLPhase 2, 4
Logs discoveryagents/logs-discovery.mdVM_LOGS_URLPhase 2, 4
Traces discoveryagents/traces-discovery.mdVM_TRACES_URLPhase 2, 4

Skill-to-API Mapping

victoriametrics-query  = Metrics only (MetricsQL/PromQL) → $VM_METRICS_URL
victorialogs-query     = Logs only (LogsQL)              → $VM_LOGS_URL
victoriatraces-query   = Traces only (Jaeger API)        → $VM_TRACES_URL
alertmanager-query     = AlertManager (silences, routing) → $VM_ALERTMANAGER_URL

Never cross APIs between backends. Use the correct env var and endpoint for each data type.

AlertManager provides what VM alerts cannot: silences and inhibition state. But it's in-cluster and may be down — fall back to $VM_METRICS_URL/api/v1/alerts when unavailable.

Timestamp Formats

BackendParameterFormatExample
VictoriaMetricsstart/endRFC3339 string2026-02-06T09:00:00Z
VictoriaLogsstart (REQUIRED), endRFC3339 string2026-02-06T09:00:00Z
VictoriaTracesstart/endUnix microseconds NUMBER1738836000000000 (16 digits)
VictoriaTraces (dependencies)endTs/lookbackUnix milliseconds NUMBER1738836000000 (13 digits) / 3600000

VictoriaLogs start is always required — omitting it scans ALL stored data (extremely expensive).

Discovery Protocol

Follow this order for each signal type. For full API details and additional endpoints, invoke the corresponding query skill.

Metrics Discovery → victoriametrics-query skill

  1. Search metadata by keyword: $VM_METRICS_URL/api/v1/metadata?metric=<keyword>&limit=10
  2. Label values for scoping: $VM_METRICS_URL/api/v1/label/<label_name>/values (filter with match[])
  3. Series for a namespace: $VM_METRICS_URL/api/v1/series?limit=20 with match[]={namespace="X"}
  4. Then query — instant at api/v1/query or range at api/v1/query_range (range requires start, RFC3339)

Logs Discovery → victorialogs-query skill

ALL VictoriaLogs endpoints require start (RFC3339). Use --data-urlencode for the query parameter.

  1. Stream field names: $VM_LOGS_URL/select/logsql/stream_field_names?start=<RFC3339>
  2. Stream field values: $VM_LOGS_URL/select/logsql/stream_field_values?start=<RFC3339>&field=namespace
  3. Facets (best discovery tool — all field distributions in one call): $VM_LOGS_URL/select/logsql/facets?start=<RFC3339>
  4. Non-stream field names: $VM_LOGS_URL/select/logsql/field_names?start=<RFC3339>
  5. Then query (JSON Lines response): $VM_LOGS_URL/select/logsql/query?start=<RFC3339>&limit=100

Traces Discovery → victoriatraces-query skill

Trace discovery endpoints accept NO time-range parameters:

  1. List services: $VM_TRACES_URL/api/services
  2. Operations for a service: $VM_TRACES_URL/api/services/<service>/operations
  3. Dependencies (Unix milliseconds, 13 digits): $VM_TRACES_URL/api/dependencies?endTs=<ms>&lookback=3600000
  4. Then search traces (service required, times in Unix microseconds, 16 digits): $VM_TRACES_URL/api/traces?service=<svc>&start=<µs>&end=<µs>&limit=20

LogsQL Quick Reference

For full LogsQL syntax, invoke the victorialogs-query skill. Key points:

  • LogsQL is space-separated (AND by default). Pipes use |.
  • Stream filters: {namespace="myapp"}
  • Word filters: {namespace="myapp"} error
  • OR: (error OR warning), Regex: ~"err|warn", Field-specific: level:error
  • Time filter: _time:1h (alternative to API start/end params — use one OR the other, never both)
  • Negation: -"expected error"
  • Stats: | stats by (level) count() as total

Common mistakes: | grep does NOT exist (use word filters or ~"regex"). | filter is valid ONLY after | stats. Stream field names depend on ingestion config — discover them first.

Investigation Playbooks

"Application is slow"

  1. Phase 1: Check alerts. Establish timeline — when did latency increase?
  2. Phase 2: Discover traced services and metrics matching the app
  3. Phase 3: Hypothesize — "latency is in [service X] based on [alert/user report]"
    • Query latency/error rate metrics for that service
    • Search traces with minDuration filter to find slow spans
  4. Phase 4: Correlate trace timestamps with logs around those times

"Pod crash looping"

  1. Phase 1: Check alerts (may already show KubePodCrashLooping). Get pod name.
  2. Phase 2: Discover metrics for restart counts, memory usage. Discover log streams for the pod.
  3. Phase 3: Hypothesize — OOM? Liveness probe failure? Startup crash?
    • Regular interval crashes → liveness probe. Memory spike before crash → OOM.
  4. Phase 4: Correlate error logs with metric timestamps to confirm cause.

"Resource growing"

  1. Phase 1: Check alerts. How fast is it growing?
  2. Phase 2: Discover resource usage metrics for the namespace/pod
  3. Phase 3: Hypothesize — leak? Increased load? Missing limits?
    • Use deriv() or increase() to quantify growth rate
    • Check per-pod breakdown to isolate the culprit
  4. Phase 4: Correlate with deployment events in logs. Did growth start after a deploy?

Common Mistakes

MistakeFix
Guessing metric namesUse metadata endpoint: $VM_METRICS_URL/api/v1/metadata?metric=keyword
Writing LogsQL from memoryConsult LogsQL Quick Reference above or victorialogs-query skill
Wrong timestamp formatSee Timestamp Formats table above
Skipping alerts checkQuery $VM_METRICS_URL/api/v1/alerts first — it's free
Empty results → "no problem"Verify metric/field names exist via discovery first
Not using facets for log explorationfacets returns field distributions in one call
Not URL-encoding queriesUse --data-urlencode 'query=...' for POST requests
Missing start on VictoriaLogsOmitting start scans ALL data (extremely expensive)
Forgetting match[] needs []match alone won't work — must be match[]
Wrong timestamp type for tracesSearch uses MICROSECONDS (16 digits), dependencies use MILLISECONDS (13 digits)
Confusing stats_query vs stats_query_rangeInstant uses time, range uses start/end/step
Mixing _time: filter with API startUse one OR the other, never both
Searching "error" catching vmselect noiseAdd -"vm_slow_query_stats" to exclude PromQL text
Grouping logs by cluster fieldVector logs lack cluster stream field — use kubernetes.pod_namespace
Blocking on AlertManager failureUse VM alerts as primary, AlertManager as best-effort
Single-signal conclusionCorrelate across at least two signal types before claiming root cause

Bundled files

The model reads these on demand while the skill is loaded. They are exposed as readable files and are never executed.

Frequently asked questions

What does the Investigating With Observability AI skill do?

Use when investigating issues, debugging problems for applications, or responding to alerts in the Kubernetes cluster using VictoriaMetrics, VictoriaLogs, or VictoriaTraces.

Why use Investigating With Observability on TypingMind?

Because you install it once and use it with any model. Investigating With Observability is plain Markdown rather than provider-specific code, so the same skill runs on GPT-5, Claude, Gemini, Grok, or a local model — and you can switch model mid-chat without it breaking. TypingMind runs on your own API keys, so you pay providers directly instead of a per-seat subscription, and your skills and chats stay in your own storage.

How do I install Investigating With Observability in TypingMind?

Open Plugins → Skills → Install from GitHub in TypingMind and paste https://github.com/VictoriaMetrics/skills/tree/main/plugins/diagnostics/skills/investigating-with-observability. TypingMind reads its SKILL.md and bundles its files and installs it as a skill you can enable per chat.

Which AI models can use Investigating With Observability?

Any model you connect in TypingMind. AI skills are plain Markdown instructions rather than provider-specific code, so GPT, Claude, Gemini, Grok, and local models can all load this skill when a request matches it.

How many AI models can I use with Investigating With Observability?

As many as you like. As long as a model supports skills, you can use Investigating With Observability with it — GPT, Claude, Gemini, Grok, DeepSeek, Mistral, Llama and more — all on TypingMind with your own API keys.

Is the Investigating With Observability AI skill free?

Yes. It is published on GitHub by VictoriaMetrics under the Apache-2.0 license. You only pay your own AI provider for the tokens you use.

What are AI skills?

An AI skill is a reusable instruction bundle that teaches an AI model how to do one specific task. It follows the open Agent Skills format: a SKILL.md file with a name and description, plus any scripts, templates or reference files the model may need. The model reads the instructions only when your request matches the skill, so an installed skill costs nothing until it is used.

How are AI skills different from plugins or MCP servers?

A plugin or MCP server gives a model new tools to call — code that runs somewhere and returns a result. An AI skill gives the model knowledge and process instead: how to approach a task, which steps to follow, what good output looks like. Skills are plain Markdown, so they need no server, no API key and no runtime, and they work with any model.

View all

Set up your own AI workspace now

Get notified about new features and future giveaways by subscribing to our newsletter 👇