Decompose Review Modules
Discipline And Interview Setup
Read discipline-routing.md, then only the selected discipline profile. Reuse the user's existing brief; do not restart intake at each stage. For journalism/communication or information science, use that profile's concepts, extraction fields, and appraisal checks instead of a generic social-science template.
When the user requests "grill me", 追问, or 模拟答辩, read research-interview.md. Ask one decision-relevant question per turn and wait; do not generate the stage deliverable until enough decisions are settled or the user asks to proceed. In quick/no-question mode, record assumptions and continue without inventing answers.
For evidence extraction or drafting, read review-workflow.md. With no sources, give a plan or outline, not a purported synthesis. If reference files are unavailable, retain the source guardrails below and state that discipline guidance is missing.
Goal
Convert one core research question into a small set of review modules that cover the key dimensions of the problem without collapsing into a loose topic list.
Workflow
- Restate the core question in one sentence.
- Identify the main actors, mechanisms, outcomes, contexts, and constraints embedded in the question.
- Propose 3-5 modules that are independent enough to become review sections.
- Check whether sub-questions repeat. A paper may inform several modules; record separate evidence contributions rather than forcing each paper into one bucket.
- Check coverage: the modules together should explain the main question's key dimensions.
- Assess coverage only from the supplied or retrieved corpus. Without it, label module coverage "not assessed"; do not infer a gap or literature density from the outline.
Module Design Rules
Good modules should be:
- Mutually distinguishable: each module asks a different sub-question.
- Collectively useful: together they help answer the core question.
- Literature-searchable: each can generate keywords, inclusion criteria, and section titles.
- Analytical rather than decorative: use a distinct synthesis task for each section, including conceptual or historical tasks; a mechanism is not mandatory.
Common Module Axes
Choose axes that fit the question:
- Drivers: economic incentives, capability thresholds, social networks, institutional environment.
- Mechanisms: perception, decision process, resource allocation, coordination, feedback loops.
- Actors: individuals, organizations, platforms, governments, communities.
- Stages: adoption, use, persistence, exit, diffusion.
- Contexts: region, industry, policy period, population type, technology maturity.
- Outcomes: performance, equity, participation, sustainability, resilience.
Output Format
Provide:
markdown## Core Question [One sentence] ## Proposed Modules | Module | Sub-question | Include | Exclude | |---|---|---|---| | ... | ... | ... | ... | ## Coverage Check - What the modules cover well: ... - Possible missing dimension: ... - Possible overlap to revise: ... ## Suggested Review Outline 1. ... 2. ... 3. ... ## 待核实清单 [Unverified sources, "未查到" results, sentences marked [需补来源], and inferences that still need checking; write "无" if empty] ## 给作者的问题 [Judgment calls that belong to the author; write "无" if empty]
The output sections above, and the two closing sections, keep fixed names and order; see references/output-contract.md (a copy bundled in this skill folder).
Guardrails
- Do not create more than five main modules unless the user explicitly asks for a large taxonomy.
- Do not organize modules only by author, year, country, or method unless that is the analytical point.
- When the user gives only a broad topic, first invoke question refinement logic before decomposing modules.
- Source integrity: follow
references/source-integrity.md. Search keywords and expected literature distribution are suggestions, not findings; do not name specific papers unless the user provided them. Use only sources the user provided or that are verified, tag each with a status (用户提供 / 已核验 / 未核验), write "未查到" instead of completing authors, year, journal, or pages, and put anything unverified in## 待核实清单. If that file is not available, still apply these rules.
