Arxiv Paper Writer

ML/AI Review Paper Workflow (IEEEtran template)

Prerequisites

• Python 3.8+ (for scripts)
• Web browsing/search capability (for citation verification)
• LaTeX recommended (pdflatex + bibtex or latexmk) for compilation

When to Use

• ML/AI review papers for arXiv (main text ~6-10 pages; references excluded)
• LaTeX + BibTeX workflow with verified citations
• Citation validation/repair on existing LaTeX projects

When NOT to Use

• Novel experimental research papers (this is a review workflow)
• Non-academic documents

Role in the Paper Stack

• This skill is the review-paper executor in the broader paper stack.
• Use ../paper-from-zero/SKILL.md as the default front door when the topic is known but the paper mode is not yet decided.
• Use this skill directly only when the deliverable is clearly a review/survey-style paper or when an existing LaTeX review project needs citation validation/repair.

Inputs

• Topic description (required)
• Constraints: venue, page limit, author/affiliations (optional)
• Existing project path for citation validation (optional)

Outputs

• main.tex (LaTeX source)
• ref.bib (verified BibTeX entries)
• IEEEtran.cls
• paper.config.yaml (machine-readable venue/style/source policy config)
• plan/<timestamp>-<slug>.md, issues/<timestamp>-<slug>.csv
• Figures/tables; main.pdf
• notes/literature-notes.md (optional per-citation notes)
• notes/arxiv-registry.sqlite3 (arXiv metadata/BibTeX cache)
• notes/style-profile.yaml (optional target-venue style profile)

Conventions: run python3 scripts/... from this skill folder (where scripts/ lives); <paper_dir> is the paper/project root (contains main.tex, ref.bib, paper.config.yaml, plan/, issues/, notes/). Paths like plan/... are under <paper_dir>. For arXiv discovery/metadata/BibTeX, use scripts/arxiv_registry.py (no ad-hoc curl/wget). Use scripts/source_ranker.py, scripts/citation_policy.py, and scripts/style_profile.py for source-quality, venue-policy, and style-profile workflows.

Gated Workflow

Tip: Run python3 scripts/<script>.py --help before use. Open reference files only when a step calls them out.

Non-Negotiable Rules

1. No prose in main.tex until plan approved AND issues CSV exists.
2. First deliverable: research snapshot + outline + clarification questions + draft plan.
3. Use plan + issues tracking for all new papers; do not opt out.
4. Issues CSV is the execution contract; update Status and Verified_Citations per issue, and add/split/insert issue rows when scope grows (do not do untracked work).
5. Template is fixed: use IEEEtran two-column layout (assets/template/IEEEtran.cls). Treat two-column width as a layout constraint (use two-column floats when needed).

Gate 0: Research Snapshot + Draft Plan

1. Confirm constraints (venue, page limit, author block, date range).
2. Translate the topic into search keywords and run a light discovery pass: 10-20 key papers (see references/research-workflow.md). After step 4 (once <paper_dir> exists), cache arXiv discovery with arxiv_registry.py search.
3. Propose 2-4 candidate titles aligned to the topic.
4. Scaffold the project folder and draft plan:

   bashCopy code
   python3 scripts/bootstrap_ieee_review_paper.py --stage kickoff --topic "<topic>"
   

   For a lighter entrypoint that still creates paper.config.yaml and a draft plan, use:

   bashCopy code
   python3 scripts/bootstrap_ieee_review_paper.py --stage outline --topic "<topic>"
   

   This copies LaTeX templates from assets/template/; plan/issues are generated from templates in assets/. Initialize arXiv registry (once): python3 scripts/arxiv_registry.py --project-dir <paper_dir> init.
5. Create a framework skeleton in main.tex (section headings + 2-4 bullets per section + seed citations; no prose).
6. Update the plan file to reflect the framework, proposed titles, and section/subsection plan.
7. Compile early: python3 scripts/compile_paper.py --project-dir <paper_dir> --check-warnings Fix any Overfull \hbox warnings (see Layout Hygiene below).
8. Return to user:
   • Proposed outline (5-8 sections, 2-4 bullets each)
   • Planned visualizations (5+) mapped to sections (see references/visual-templates.md)
   • Clarification questions
9. STOP until user approves.

Gate 1: Create Issues CSV (after approval)

1. Check kickoff gate in plan: - [x] User confirmed scope + outline in chat.
2. Create issues CSV (script refuses if gate unchecked):

   bashCopy code
   python3 scripts/bootstrap_ieee_review_paper.py --stage issues --topic "<topic>" --with-literature-notes
   

3. Validate:

   bashCopy code
   python3 scripts/validate_paper_issues.py <paper_dir>/issues/<timestamp>-<slug>.csv
   

4. If literature notes are enabled, keep short summaries and (optional) abstract snippets to avoid re-search.
5. The plan may evolve; add/split/insert issues as needed, re閳ユ唺alidate after edits, and keep going until all issues (including inserted ones) are DONE or SKIP (when feasible, in the same run).

Phase 1.5: Literature Enrichment Gate

Before starting the writing loop, ensure citation coverage is adequate for a review/survey paper. Review papers require substantially more references than empirical papers.

1. Gather candidates: collect papers from initial discovery, spine set, and sub-area searches. Aim for 50-80 candidate entries in ref.bib.
2. Sub-area coverage: for each Related Work subsection (from the outline contract or framework skeleton), verify ≥ 5 cited papers. If any sub-area has fewer, search for additional papers in that cluster.
3. Seminal work: for each major research thread in the taxonomy, verify at least 1 foundational/seminal paper (pre-2020) is cited alongside recent work. Review papers that cite only recent work look shallow.
4. Key method citations: every method, algorithm, or benchmark mentioned by name in the outline must have a corresponding ref.bib entry.
5. Quality screening: verify and filter all citations via the standard verification pipeline (arxiv_registry.py → source_ranker.py → citation_policy.py). Remove entries that fail verification, are duplicates, or are Tier C (low-quality) sources unless no better alternative exists for that claim.
6. Gate (post-screening): do not start W1 until ref.bib has ≥ 30 verified entries after screening. Target 60-80 for the finished paper (additional citations are added during Phase 2 writing). Every Related Work sub-area must still have ≥ 5 verified citations after screening. If the gate fails, return to enrichment (repeat steps 2-5) before proceeding.

Phase 2: Per-Issue Writing Loop

For each writing issue in the CSV:

• If an issue balloons (new figure, new subsection, new benchmark set, or a large QA fix), split/insert new issue row(s) (e.g., W6a, Q5) before proceeding; re-run python3 scripts/validate_paper_issues.py <issues.csv>; keep going until all issues are DONE/SKIP.

1. Research: 8-12 section-specific papers.
2. Write: Never 3 sentences without citations; varied paragraph rhythm (see references/writing-style.md). For section intent and structure, use references/template-usage.md.
3. Visualize: Match content triggers (see references/visual-templates.md). Prioritize single-column sizing; use double-column spans only when necessary (see Layout Hygiene). Cite externally sourced figure content.
4. Verify: Web search + open source page (and PDF if available) before adding to ref.bib. For arXiv entries, append BibTeX via python3 scripts/arxiv_registry.py --project-dir <paper_dir> export-bibtex <arxiv_id> --out-bib <paper_dir>/ref.bib. For a per-issue shortcut with stable cite keys, use python3 scripts/issue_workflow.py --project-dir <paper_dir> append-bibtex --issue-id <Wx> <arxiv_id> [<arxiv_id> ...].
5. Update: Mark issue DONE with Verified_Citations count. To sync Verified_Citations from actual section citations, run python3 scripts/issue_workflow.py --project-dir <paper_dir> sync-verified --issues <issues.csv>.
6. Compile after meaningful changes; fix Overfull \hbox before marking DONE.

Phase 2.2: Issue Execution Helpers

• Use python3 scripts/issue_workflow.py --project-dir <paper_dir> render-skeleton --issues <issues.csv> --issue-id <Wx> to render a LaTeX section skeleton for a Writing issue.
• Add --apply-if-missing only when the full section path is entirely absent from main.tex; nested insertion under an existing parent stays manual.
• Before QA or after a batch of edits, run python3 scripts/issue_workflow.py --project-dir <paper_dir> audit --issues <issues.csv> to check section-path consistency, citation counts, placeholders, and lightweight figure/page signals.

Phase 2.5: Rhythm Refinement

After all writing issues are DONE, refine prose section-by-section using the latex-rhythm-refiner skill. This step varies sentence/paragraph lengths and removes filler phrases while preserving all citations.

Phase 3: QA Gate

1. Run internal QA checklist (see references/quality-report.md).
2. Audit source quality and venue policy:
   • python3 scripts/issue_workflow.py --project-dir <paper_dir> audit --issues <issues.csv> --fail-on-issues
   • python3 scripts/source_ranker.py --project-dir <paper_dir> rank
   • python3 scripts/citation_policy.py --project-dir <paper_dir> audit-bib
   • python3 scripts/citation_policy.py --project-dir <paper_dir> audit-tex --issues <issues.csv>
   • python3 scripts/style_profile.py --project-dir <paper_dir> check-draft (if using style_mode=target_venue)
   • python3 scripts/compile_paper.py --project-dir <paper_dir> --check-warnings --fail-on-warnings
   • python3 scripts/citation_policy.py --project-dir <paper_dir> lint-bib --fail-on-lint
3. Compile; ensure no Overfull \hbox warnings in main.log.
4. Deliver main.tex, ref.bib, figures, and main.pdf.

Existing Paper Workflow (No Re-Scaffold)

If a paper folder already exists, do NOT rerun scaffold:

bashCopy code
# Create plan
python3 scripts/create_paper_plan.py --topic "<topic>" --stage plan --output-dir <paper_dir>
# STOP for approval, then check kickoff gate box
# Create issues (use timestamp/slug from plan filename/frontmatter)
python3 scripts/create_paper_plan.py --topic "<topic>" --stage issues --timestamp "<TS>" --slug "<slug>" --output-dir <paper_dir> --with-literature-notes

Citation-Validation Variant

1. Treat provided path as LaTeX project root.
2. Follow references/citation-workflow.md.
3. Use references/bibtex-guide.md for BibTeX rules if entries need repair.
4. Deliver validation report and corrected ref.bib if requested.

Success Criteria

Compilation: python3 scripts/compile_paper.py --project-dir <paper_dir> --check-warnings --fail-on-warnings (exit 0). Use --report-page-counts for main-text page count.

Quality Metrics:

• 6-10 pages of main text (references excluded)
• 60-80 total citations (8+ per section)
• Every Related Work sub-area has ≥ 5 citations
• At least 1 seminal/foundational citation per major research thread
• 100% citation verification rate
• 70%+ citations from last 3 years
• 5+ visualization types
• All issues DONE or SKIP

Safety & Guardrails

• Never fabricate citations or results; add TODO and ask user if evidence missing.
• Verify every citation via web search + source page (and PDF if available) before adding to ref.bib.
• Confirm before large literature searches.
• Do not overwrite user files without confirmation.
• Issues CSV is the contract; mark DONE only when criteria met.
• No submission bundles unless user requests.

Layout Hygiene

Fix Overfull \hbox warnings before marking issues DONE:

• Figures: start with figure + \columnwidth; switch to figure* + \textwidth if needed
• Tables: prefer p{...} column widths / \tabcolsep over \resizebox
• Equations: use split, multline, aligned, or IEEEeqnarray for line-breaking

Issues CSV Schema

Status: TODO -> DOING -> DONE. Schema validated by validate_paper_issues.py.