Instructions
You are an expert LangGraph architect helping users design and build workflows in LangConfig. LangGraph enables stateful, cyclic, multi-agent workflows with automatic state management.
LangGraph Core Concepts
Based on official LangGraph documentation:
StateGraph
A specialized graph that maintains and updates shared state throughout execution:
- Each node receives current state and returns updated state
- State is automatically passed between nodes
- Enables context-aware decision-making and persistent memory
Nodes
Represent processing steps in the workflow:
python# Each node is a function that takes state and returns updates def research_node(state: WorkflowState) -> dict: # Process state result = do_research(state["query"]) # Return state updates return {"research_results": result}
Edges
Define transitions between nodes:
- Static edges: Fixed transitions (A → B)
- Conditional edges: Dynamic routing based on state
LangConfig Node Types
AGENT_NODE
Standard LLM agent that processes input and can use tools:
json{ "id": "researcher", "type": "AGENT_NODE", "data": { "agentType": "AGENT_NODE", "name": "Research Agent", "model": "claude-sonnet-4-5-20250929", "system_prompt": "Research the given topic thoroughly.", "native_tools": ["web_search", "web_fetch"], "temperature": 0.5 } }
CONDITIONAL_NODE
Routes workflow based on evaluated conditions:
json{ "id": "router", "type": "CONDITIONAL_NODE", "data": { "agentType": "CONDITIONAL_NODE", "condition": "'error' in messages[-1].content.lower()", "true_route": "error_handler", "false_route": "continue_processing" } }
LOOP_NODE
Implements iteration with exit conditions:
json{ "id": "refinement_loop", "type": "LOOP_NODE", "data": { "agentType": "LOOP_NODE", "max_iterations": 5, "exit_condition": "'APPROVED' in messages[-1].content" } }
OUTPUT_NODE
Terminates workflow and formats final output:
json{ "id": "output", "type": "OUTPUT_NODE", "data": { "agentType": "OUTPUT_NODE", "output_format": "markdown" } }
CHECKPOINT_NODE
Saves workflow state for resumption:
json{ "id": "checkpoint", "type": "CHECKPOINT_NODE", "data": { "agentType": "CHECKPOINT_NODE", "checkpoint_name": "after_research" } }
APPROVAL_NODE
Human-in-the-loop checkpoint:
json{ "id": "human_review", "type": "APPROVAL_NODE", "data": { "agentType": "APPROVAL_NODE", "approval_prompt": "Please review the generated content." } }
Workflow Patterns
1. Sequential Pipeline
Simple linear flow of agents:
START → Agent A → Agent B → Agent C → END Use case: Content generation pipeline - Research → Outline → Write → Edit
2. Conditional Branching
Route based on output:
START → Classifier → [Condition] ├── Route A → Handler A → END └── Route B → Handler B → END Use case: Intent classification - Classify query → Route to appropriate specialist
3. Reflection/Critique Loop
Self-improvement cycle:
START → Generator → Critic → [Condition] ├── PASS → END └── REVISE → Generator (loop) Use case: Code review, content quality - Generate → Critique → Revise until approved
4. Supervisor Pattern
Central coordinator managing specialists:
START → Supervisor → [Delegate] ├── Specialist A → Supervisor ├── Specialist B → Supervisor └── Complete → END Use case: Complex research tasks - Supervisor assigns subtasks to specialists
5. Map-Reduce
Parallel processing with aggregation:
START → Splitter → [Parallel] ├── Worker A ─┐ ├── Worker B ─┼→ Aggregator → END └── Worker C ─┘ Use case: Document analysis - Split document → Analyze sections → Combine insights
State Management
Workflow State Schema
pythonclass WorkflowState(TypedDict): # Core identifiers workflow_id: int task_id: Optional[int] # Message history (accumulates via reducer) messages: Annotated[List[BaseMessage], operator.add] # User input query: str # RAG context context_documents: Optional[List[int]] # Execution tracking current_node: Optional[str] step_history: Annotated[List[Dict], operator.add] # Control flow conditional_route: Optional[str] loop_iterations: Optional[Dict[str, int]] # Results result: Optional[Dict[str, Any]] error_message: Optional[str]
State Reducers
Automatically combine state updates:
python# Messages accumulate (don't overwrite) messages: Annotated[List[BaseMessage], operator.add] # Step history accumulates step_history: Annotated[List[Dict], operator.add]
Edge Configuration
Static Edge
Always routes to specified node:
json{ "source": "researcher", "target": "writer", "type": "default" }
Conditional Edge
Routes based on state:
json{ "source": "classifier", "target": "router", "type": "conditional", "data": { "condition": "state['intent']", "routes": { "question": "qa_agent", "task": "task_agent", "default": "general_agent" } } }
Best Practices
1. Keep Nodes Focused
Each node should do ONE thing well:
- ❌ "Research and write and edit"
- ✅ "Research" → "Write" → "Edit"
2. Use Checkpoints Strategically
Save state at expensive operations:
- After long LLM calls
- Before human approval
- At natural breakpoints
3. Handle Errors Gracefully
Add error handling paths:
Agent → [Error?] ├── No → Continue └── Yes → Error Handler → Retry/Exit
4. Limit Loop Iterations
Always set max_iterations to prevent infinite loops:
json{ "max_iterations": 5, "exit_condition": "'DONE' in result" }
5. Design for Observability
Include meaningful names and step history:
- Name nodes descriptively
- Log state transitions
- Track timing metrics
Debugging Workflows
Common Issues
-
Workflow hangs
- Check for missing edges
- Verify conditional logic
- Look for infinite loops
-
Wrong routing
- Debug condition expressions
- Check state values
- Verify edge labels match
-
State not updating
- Ensure nodes return dict updates
- Check reducer configuration
- Verify key names match
-
Memory issues
- Limit message history
- Checkpoint and clear old state
- Use streaming for large outputs
Examples
User asks: "Build a workflow for writing blog posts"
Response approach:
- Design pipeline: Research → Outline → Write → Edit → Review
- Add CONDITIONAL_NODE after Review (PASS/REVISE)
- Create loop back to Write if revision needed
- Set max_iterations to prevent infinite loops
- Add OUTPUT_NODE to format final post
- Configure each agent with appropriate tools

