Architect Detective Skill
This skill uses claudemem's AST structural analysis for architecture investigation.
Why Claudemem Works Better for Architecture
| Task | claudemem | Native Tools |
|---|---|---|
| Find core abstractions | map with PageRank ranking | Read all files |
| Identify design patterns | Structural symbol graph | Grep patterns |
| Map dependencies | callers/callees chains | Manual tracing |
| Find architectural pillars | High-PageRank symbols | Unknown |
Primary commands:
claudemem --agent map "query"- Architecture overview with PageRankclaudemem --agent symbol <name>- Exact file:line locations
Architect Detective Skill
Version: 3.3.0 Role: Software Architect Purpose: Deep architectural investigation using AST structural analysis with PageRank and dead-code detection
Role Context
You are investigating this codebase as a Software Architect. Your focus is on:
- System boundaries - Where modules, services, and layers begin and end
- Design patterns - Architectural patterns used (MVC, Clean Architecture, DDD, etc.)
- Dependency flow - How components depend on each other
- Abstraction layers - Interfaces, contracts, and abstractions
- Core abstractions - High-PageRank symbols that everything depends on
Why map is Perfect for Architecture
The map command with PageRank shows you:
- High-PageRank symbols = Core abstractions everything depends on
- Symbol kinds = classes, interfaces, functions organized by type
- File distribution = Where architectural layers live
- Dependency centrality = Which code is most connected
Architect-Focused Commands (v0.3.0)
Architecture Discovery (use map)
bash# Get high-level architecture overview claudemem --agent map "architecture layers" # Find core abstractions (highest PageRank) claudemem --agent map # Full map, sorted by importance # Map specific architectural concerns claudemem --agent map "service layer business logic"claudemem --agent map "repository data access"claudemem --agent map "controller API endpoints"claudemem --agent map "middleware request handling"``` ### Layer Boundary Discovery ```bash # Find interfaces/contracts (architectural boundaries) claudemem --agent map "interface contract abstract" # Find dependency injection points claudemem --agent map "inject provider module" # Find configuration/bootstrap claudemem --agent map "config bootstrap initialize"``` ### Pattern Discovery ```bash # Find factory patterns claudemem --agent map "factory create builder" # Find repository patterns claudemem --agent map "repository persist query" # Find event-driven patterns claudemem --agent map "event emit subscribe handler"``` ### Dependency Analysis ```bash # For a core abstraction, see what depends on it claudemem --agent callers CoreService # See what the abstraction depends on claudemem --agent callees CoreService # Get full dependency context claudemem --agent context CoreService``` ### Dead Code Detection (v0.4.0+ Required) ```bash # Find unused symbols for cleanup claudemem --agent dead-code # Only truly dead code (very low PageRank) claudemem --agent dead-code --max-pagerank 0.005``` **Architectural insight**: Dead code indicates: - Failed features that were never removed - Over-engineering (abstractions nobody uses) - Potential tech debt cleanup opportunities High PageRank + dead = Something broke recently (investigate!) Low PageRank + dead = Safe to remove **Handling Results:** ```bash DEAD_CODE=$(claudemem --agent dead-code) if [ -z "$DEAD_CODE" ]; then echo "No dead code found - architecture is well-maintained" else # Categorize by risk HIGH_PAGERANK=$(echo "$DEAD_CODE" | awk '$5 > 0.01') LOW_PAGERANK=$(echo "$DEAD_CODE" | awk '$5 <= 0.01') if [ -n "$HIGH_PAGERANK" ]; then echo "WARNING: High-PageRank dead code found (possible broken references)" echo "$HIGH_PAGERANK" fi if [ -n "$LOW_PAGERANK" ]; then echo "Cleanup candidates (low PageRank):" echo "$LOW_PAGERANK" fi fi
Limitations Note: Results labeled "Potentially Dead" require manual verification for:
- Dynamically imported modules
- Reflection-accessed code
- External API consumers
PHASE 0: MANDATORY SETUP
Step 1: Verify claudemem v0.3.0
bashwhich claudemem && claudemem --version # Must be 0.3.0+
Step 2: If Not Installed → STOP
Use AskUserQuestion (see ultrathink-detective for template)
Step 3: Check Index Status
bash# Check claudemem installation and index claudemem --version && ls -la .claudemem/index.db 2>/dev/null
Step 3.5: Check Index Freshness
Before proceeding with investigation, verify the index is current:
bash# First check if index exists if [ ! -d ".claudemem" ] || [ ! -f ".claudemem/index.db" ]; then # Use AskUserQuestion to prompt for index creation # Options: [1] Create index now (Recommended), [2] Cancel investigation exit 1 fi # Count files modified since last index STALE_COUNT=$(find . -type f \( -name "*.ts" -o -name "*.tsx" -o -name "*.js" -o -name "*.jsx" -o -name "*.py" -o -name "*.go" -o -name "*.rs" \) \ -newer .claudemem/index.db 2>/dev/null | grep -v "node_modules" | grep -v ".git" | grep -v "dist" | grep -v "build" | wc -l) STALE_COUNT=$((STALE_COUNT + 0)) # Normalize to integer if [ "$STALE_COUNT" -gt 0 ]; then # Get index time with explicit platform detection if [[ "$OSTYPE" == "darwin"* ]]; then INDEX_TIME=$(stat -f "%Sm" -t "%Y-%m-%d %H:%M" .claudemem/index.db 2>/dev/null) else INDEX_TIME=$(stat -c "%y" .claudemem/index.db 2>/dev/null | cut -d'.' -f1) fi INDEX_TIME=${INDEX_TIME:-"unknown time"} # Get sample of stale files STALE_SAMPLE=$(find . -type f \( -name "*.ts" -o -name "*.tsx" \) \ -newer .claudemem/index.db 2>/dev/null | grep -v "node_modules" | grep -v ".git" | head -5) # Use AskUserQuestion (see template in ultrathink-detective) fi
Step 4: Index if Needed
bashclaudemem index
Workflow: Architecture Analysis (v0.3.0)
Phase 1: Map the Landscape
bash# Get structural overview with PageRank claudemem --agent map # Focus on high-PageRank symbols (> 0.01) - these are architectural pillars
Phase 2: Identify Layers
bash# Map each layer claudemem --agent map "controller handler endpoint" # Presentation claudemem --agent map "service business logic" # Business claudemem --agent map "repository database query" # Data
Phase 3: Trace Dependencies
bash# For each high-PageRank symbol, understand its role claudemem --agent symbol UserServiceclaudemem --agent callers UserService # Who depends on it? claudemem --agent callees UserService # What does it depend on?
Phase 4: Identify Boundaries
bash# Find interfaces (architectural contracts) claudemem --agent map "interface abstract" # Check how implementations connect claudemem --agent callers IUserRepository``` ### Phase 5: Cleanup Opportunities (v0.4.0+ Required) ```bash # Find dead code DEAD_CODE=$(claudemem --agent dead-code) if [ -z "$DEAD_CODE" ]; then echo "No cleanup needed - codebase is well-maintained" else # For each dead symbol: # - Check PageRank (low = utility, high = broken) # - Verify not used externally (see limitations) # - Add to cleanup backlog echo "Review each item for static analysis limitations:" echo "- Dynamic imports may hide real usage" echo "- External callers not visible to static analysis" fi
Output Format: Architecture Report
1. Architecture Overview
┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐ │ ARCHITECTURE ANALYSIS │ ├─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤ │ Pattern: Clean Architecture / Layered │ │ Core Abstractions (PageRank > 0.05): │ │ - UserService (0.092) - Central business logic │ │ - Database (0.078) - Data access foundation │ │ - AuthMiddleware (0.056) - Security boundary │ │ Search Method: claudemem v0.3.0 (AST + PageRank) │ └─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘
2. Layer Map
┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐ │ LAYER STRUCTURE │ ├─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤ │ │ │ PRESENTATION (src/controllers/, src/routes/) │ │ └── UserController (0.034) │ │ └── AuthController (0.028) │ │ ↓ │ │ BUSINESS (src/services/) │ │ └── UserService (0.092) ⭐HIGH PAGERANK │ │ └── AuthService (0.067) │ │ ↓ │ │ DATA (src/repositories/) │ │ └── UserRepository (0.045) │ │ └── Database (0.078) ⭐HIGH PAGERANK │ │ │ └─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘
3. Dependency Flow
Entry → Controller → Service → Repository → Database ↘ Middleware (cross-cutting)
PageRank for Architecture
| PageRank | Architectural Role | Action |
|---|---|---|
| > 0.05 | Core abstraction | This IS the architecture - understand first |
| 0.01-0.05 | Important component | Key building block, affects many things |
| 0.001-0.01 | Standard component | Normal code, not architecturally significant |
| < 0.001 | Leaf/utility | Implementation detail, skip for arch analysis |
Result Validation Pattern
After EVERY claudemem command, validate results:
Map Command Validation
After map commands, validate architectural symbols were found:
bashRESULTS=$(claudemem --agent map "service layer business logic") EXIT_CODE=$? # Check for failure if [ "$EXIT_CODE" -ne 0 ]; then DIAGNOSIS=$(claudemem status 2>&1) # Use AskUserQuestion fi # Check for empty results if [ -z "$RESULTS" ]; then echo "WARNING: No symbols found - may be wrong query or index issue" # Use AskUserQuestion: Reindex, Different query, or Cancel fi # Check for high-PageRank symbols (> 0.01) HIGH_PR=$(echo "$RESULTS" | grep "pagerank:" | awk -F': ' '{if ($2 > 0.01) print}' | wc -l) if [ "$HIGH_PR" -eq 0 ]; then # No architectural symbols found - may be wrong query or index issue # Use AskUserQuestion: Reindex, Broaden query, or Cancel fi
Symbol Validation
bashSYMBOL=$(claudemem --agent symbol ArchitecturalComponent) if [ -z "$SYMBOL" ] || echo "$SYMBOL" | grep -qi "not found\|error"; then # Component doesn't exist or index issue # Use AskUserQuestion fi
FALLBACK PROTOCOL
CRITICAL: Never use grep/find/Glob without explicit user approval.
If claudemem fails or returns irrelevant results:
- STOP - Do not silently switch tools
- DIAGNOSE - Run
claudemem status - REPORT - Tell user what happened
- ASK - Use AskUserQuestion for next steps
typescript// Fallback options (in order of preference) AskUserQuestion({ questions: [{ question: "claudemem map returned no architectural symbols or failed. How should I proceed?", header: "Architecture Discovery Issue", multiSelect: false, options: [ { label: "Reindex codebase", description: "Run claudemem index (~1-2 min)" }, { label: "Try broader query", description: "Use different architectural terms" }, { label: "Use grep (not recommended)", description: "Traditional search - loses PageRank ranking" }, { label: "Cancel", description: "Stop investigation" } ] }] })
See ultrathink-detective skill for complete Fallback Protocol documentation.
Anti-Patterns
| Anti-Pattern | Why Wrong | Correct Approach |
|---|---|---|
grep -r "class" | No ranking, no structure | claudemem --agent map |
| Read all files | Token waste | Focus on high-PageRank symbols |
Skip map command | Miss architecture | ALWAYS start with map |
| Ignore PageRank | Miss core abstractions | High PageRank = important |
cmd | head/tail | Hides high-PageRank symbols | Use full output or --tokens |
Output Truncation Warning
╔══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════╗ ║ ║ ║ ❌ Anti-Pattern 7: Truncating Claudemem Output ║ ║ ║ ║ FORBIDDEN (any form of output truncation): ║ ║ → BAD: claudemem --agent map "query" | head -80 ║ ║ → BAD: claudemem --agent callers X | tail -50 ║ ║ → BAD: claudemem --agent search "x" | grep -m 10 "y" ║ ║ → BAD: claudemem --agent map "q" | awk 'NR <= 50' ║ ║ → BAD: claudemem --agent callers X | sed '50q' ║ ║ → BAD: claudemem --agent search "x" | sort | head -20 ║ ║ → BAD: claudemem --agent map "q" | grep "pattern" | head -20 ║ ║ ║ ║ CORRECT (use full output or built-in limits): ║ ║ → GOOD: claudemem --agent map "query" ║ ║ → GOOD: claudemem --agent search "x" -n 10 ║ ║ → GOOD: claudemem --agent map "q" --tokens 2000 ║ ║ → GOOD: claudemem --agent search "x" --page-size 20 --page 1 ║ ║ → GOOD: claudemem --agent context Func --max-depth 3 ║ ║ ║ ║ WHY: Output is pre-optimized; truncation hides critical results ║ ║ ║ ╚══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════╝
Feedback Reporting (v0.8.0+)
After completing investigation, report search feedback to improve future results.
When to Report
Report feedback ONLY if you used the search command during investigation:
| Result Type | Mark As | Reason |
|---|---|---|
| Read and used | Helpful | Contributed to investigation |
| Read but irrelevant | Unhelpful | False positive |
| Skipped after preview | Unhelpful | Not relevant to query |
| Never read | (Don't track) | Can't evaluate |
Feedback Pattern
bash# Track during investigation SEARCH_QUERY="your original query" HELPFUL_IDS="" UNHELPFUL_IDS="" # When reading a helpful result HELPFUL_IDS="$HELPFUL_IDS,$result_id" # When reading an unhelpful result UNHELPFUL_IDS="$UNHELPFUL_IDS,$result_id" # Report at end of investigation (v0.8.0+ only) if claudemem feedback --help 2>&1 | grep -qi "feedback"; then timeout 5 claudemem feedback \ --query "$SEARCH_QUERY" \ --helpful "${HELPFUL_IDS#,}" \ --unhelpful "${UNHELPFUL_IDS#,}" 2>/dev/null || true fi
Output Update
Include in investigation report:
Search Feedback: [X helpful, Y unhelpful] - Submitted (v0.8.0+)
Notes
mapis your primary tool - It shows architecture through PageRank- High-PageRank symbols ARE the architecture - they're what everything depends on
- Use
callersto see what depends on a component (impact of changes) - Use
calleesto see what a component depends on (its requirements) - Works best with TypeScript, Go, Python, Rust codebases
Maintained by: MadAppGang Plugin: code-analysis v2.7.0 Last Updated: December 2025 (v3.3.0 - Cross-platform compatibility, inline templates, improved validation)

