Evaluating Code Models logo

Evaluating Code Models

OrganizationPopular
Orchestra-Research
evaluating-code-models

Evaluates code generation models across HumanEval, MBPP, MultiPL-E, and 15+ benchmarks with pass@k metrics. Use when benchmarking code models, comparing coding abilities, testing multi-language support, or measuring code generation quality. Industry standard from BigCode Project used by HuggingFace leaderboards.

Overview

PublisherOrchestra-Research
RepositoryAI-Research-SKILLs
Skill nameevaluating-code-models
Stars
12.8K
Forks
916
Bundled files
3
LicenseMIT
Links
  • Markdown instructions

    A SKILL.md file the model loads on demand, so it only costs tokens when a request actually matches.

  • Works with any LLM

    AI skills are plain Markdown, not provider-specific code, so this works with GPT, Claude, Gemini, Grok, or a local model.

  • 3 bundled files

    Scripts, templates, and references the model can read while it works. Files are read-only and never executed.

  • Open source

    Published by Orchestra-Research on GitHub. Read the source before you install it.

Installation

Install the Evaluating Code Models AI skill in TypingMind to use it with any LLM, or drop it into another agent that reads SKILL.md.

1

Install in TypingMind

TypingMind installs a skill straight from its GitHub folder — it reads SKILL.md, bundles the resource files, and stores the result locally.

  1. Open the app and go to Plugins → Skills.
  2. Choose "Install from GitHub".
  3. Paste the skill folder URL below and confirm.
  4. Enable the skill in any chat where you want it available.
Plugins → Skills → Add skill → From GitHub URL, then paste the folder URL and press Continue.
2

Install in another agent

Any agent that reads the Agent Skills format can use this skill — copy the folder into that agent's skills directory.

Claude Code — .claude/skills
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/Orchestra-Research/AI-Research-SKILLs.git /tmp/AI-Research-SKILLs
mkdir -p .claude/skills
cp -r /tmp/AI-Research-SKILLs/11-evaluation/bigcode-evaluation-harness .claude/skills/evaluating-code-models
Restart Claude Code after copying so it picks up the new skill.

Use it in TypingMind

Enable Evaluating Code Models in any TypingMind chat and the model takes it from there. Its name and description sit in the system prompt, and the moment a request matches, the model loads the full instructions itself — you never invoke it by hand, and it costs no tokens until it is actually used.

The model loads Evaluating Code Models on its own as soon as a request matches it.

Works with any AI model

AI skills are plain Markdown instructions rather than provider-specific code, so Evaluating Code Models is not tied to the model it was written for. Install it once in TypingMind and use it with GPT-5, Claude, Gemini, Grok, DeepSeek, Mistral, Llama, or a local model you run yourself — all on your own API keys.

  • Loaded only when it is needed

    The system prompt carries just the name and description. The instructions are fetched on the first matching request, so an idle skill costs nothing.

  • Switch models mid-chat

    Because the skill is instructions rather than code, changing model does not break it — the next model reads the same SKILL.md.

Skill instructions

This is the SKILL.md content the model loads. Read it before installing — a skill is instructions your model will follow.

BigCode Evaluation Harness - Code Model Benchmarking

Quick Start

BigCode Evaluation Harness evaluates code generation models across 15+ benchmarks including HumanEval, MBPP, and MultiPL-E (18 languages).

Installation:

bash
git clone https://github.com/bigcode-project/bigcode-evaluation-harness.git
cd bigcode-evaluation-harness
pip install -e .
accelerate config

Evaluate on HumanEval:

bash
accelerate launch main.py \
  --model bigcode/starcoder2-7b \
  --tasks humaneval \
  --max_length_generation 512 \
  --temperature 0.2 \
  --n_samples 20 \
  --batch_size 10 \
  --allow_code_execution \
  --save_generations

View available tasks:

bash
python -c "from bigcode_eval.tasks import ALL_TASKS; print(ALL_TASKS)"

Common Workflows

Workflow 1: Standard Code Benchmark Evaluation

Evaluate model on core code benchmarks (HumanEval, MBPP, HumanEval+).

Checklist:

Code Benchmark Evaluation:
- [ ] Step 1: Choose benchmark suite
- [ ] Step 2: Configure model and generation
- [ ] Step 3: Run evaluation with code execution
- [ ] Step 4: Analyze pass@k results

Step 1: Choose benchmark suite

Python code generation (most common):

  • HumanEval: 164 handwritten problems, function completion
  • HumanEval+: Same 164 problems with 80× more tests (stricter)
  • MBPP: 500 crowd-sourced problems, entry-level difficulty
  • MBPP+: 399 curated problems with 35× more tests

Multi-language (18 languages):

  • MultiPL-E: HumanEval/MBPP translated to C++, Java, JavaScript, Go, Rust, etc.

Advanced:

  • APPS: 10,000 problems (introductory/interview/competition)
  • DS-1000: 1,000 data science problems across 7 libraries

Step 2: Configure model and generation

bash
# Standard HuggingFace model
accelerate launch main.py \
  --model bigcode/starcoder2-7b \
  --tasks humaneval \
  --max_length_generation 512 \
  --temperature 0.2 \
  --do_sample True \
  --n_samples 200 \
  --batch_size 50 \
  --allow_code_execution

# Quantized model (4-bit)
accelerate launch main.py \
  --model codellama/CodeLlama-34b-hf \
  --tasks humaneval \
  --load_in_4bit \
  --max_length_generation 512 \
  --allow_code_execution

# Custom/private model
accelerate launch main.py \
  --model /path/to/my-code-model \
  --tasks humaneval \
  --trust_remote_code \
  --use_auth_token \
  --allow_code_execution

Step 3: Run evaluation

bash
# Full evaluation with pass@k estimation (k=1,10,100)
accelerate launch main.py \
  --model bigcode/starcoder2-7b \
  --tasks humaneval \
  --temperature 0.8 \
  --n_samples 200 \
  --batch_size 50 \
  --allow_code_execution \
  --save_generations \
  --metric_output_path results/starcoder2-humaneval.json

Step 4: Analyze results

Results in results/starcoder2-humaneval.json:

json
{
  "humaneval": {
    "pass@1": 0.354,
    "pass@10": 0.521,
    "pass@100": 0.689
  },
  "config": {
    "model": "bigcode/starcoder2-7b",
    "temperature": 0.8,
    "n_samples": 200
  }
}

Workflow 2: Multi-Language Evaluation (MultiPL-E)

Evaluate code generation across 18 programming languages.

Checklist:

Multi-Language Evaluation:
- [ ] Step 1: Generate solutions (host machine)
- [ ] Step 2: Run evaluation in Docker (safe execution)
- [ ] Step 3: Compare across languages

Step 1: Generate solutions on host

bash
# Generate without execution (safe)
accelerate launch main.py \
  --model bigcode/starcoder2-7b \
  --tasks multiple-py,multiple-js,multiple-java,multiple-cpp \
  --max_length_generation 650 \
  --temperature 0.8 \
  --n_samples 50 \
  --batch_size 50 \
  --generation_only \
  --save_generations \
  --save_generations_path generations_multi.json

Step 2: Evaluate in Docker container

bash
# Pull the MultiPL-E Docker image
docker pull ghcr.io/bigcode-project/evaluation-harness-multiple

# Run evaluation inside container
docker run -v $(pwd)/generations_multi.json:/app/generations.json:ro \
  -it evaluation-harness-multiple python3 main.py \
  --model bigcode/starcoder2-7b \
  --tasks multiple-py,multiple-js,multiple-java,multiple-cpp \
  --load_generations_path /app/generations.json \
  --allow_code_execution \
  --n_samples 50

Supported languages: Python, JavaScript, Java, C++, Go, Rust, TypeScript, C#, PHP, Ruby, Swift, Kotlin, Scala, Perl, Julia, Lua, R, Racket

Workflow 3: Instruction-Tuned Model Evaluation

Evaluate chat/instruction models with proper formatting.

Checklist:

Instruction Model Evaluation:
- [ ] Step 1: Use instruction-tuned tasks
- [ ] Step 2: Configure instruction tokens
- [ ] Step 3: Run evaluation

Step 1: Choose instruction tasks

  • instruct-humaneval: HumanEval with instruction prompts
  • humanevalsynthesize-{lang}: HumanEvalPack synthesis tasks

Step 2: Configure instruction tokens

bash
# For models with chat templates (e.g., CodeLlama-Instruct)
accelerate launch main.py \
  --model codellama/CodeLlama-7b-Instruct-hf \
  --tasks instruct-humaneval \
  --instruction_tokens "<s>[INST],</s>,[/INST]" \
  --max_length_generation 512 \
  --allow_code_execution

Step 3: HumanEvalPack for instruction models

bash
# Test code synthesis across 6 languages
accelerate launch main.py \
  --model codellama/CodeLlama-7b-Instruct-hf \
  --tasks humanevalsynthesize-python,humanevalsynthesize-js \
  --prompt instruct \
  --max_length_generation 512 \
  --allow_code_execution

Workflow 4: Compare Multiple Models

Benchmark suite for model comparison.

Step 1: Create evaluation script

bash
#!/bin/bash
# eval_models.sh

MODELS=(
  "bigcode/starcoder2-7b"
  "codellama/CodeLlama-7b-hf"
  "deepseek-ai/deepseek-coder-6.7b-base"
)
TASKS="humaneval,mbpp"

for model in "${MODELS[@]}"; do
  model_name=$(echo $model | tr '/' '-')
  echo "Evaluating $model"

  accelerate launch main.py \
    --model $model \
    --tasks $TASKS \
    --temperature 0.2 \
    --n_samples 20 \
    --batch_size 20 \
    --allow_code_execution \
    --metric_output_path results/${model_name}.json
done

Step 2: Generate comparison table

python
import json
import pandas as pd

models = ["bigcode-starcoder2-7b", "codellama-CodeLlama-7b-hf", "deepseek-ai-deepseek-coder-6.7b-base"]
results = []

for model in models:
    with open(f"results/{model}.json") as f:
        data = json.load(f)
        results.append({
            "Model": model,
            "HumanEval pass@1": f"{data['humaneval']['pass@1']:.3f}",
            "MBPP pass@1": f"{data['mbpp']['pass@1']:.3f}"
        })

df = pd.DataFrame(results)
print(df.to_markdown(index=False))

When to Use vs Alternatives

Use BigCode Evaluation Harness when:

  • Evaluating code generation models specifically
  • Need multi-language evaluation (18 languages via MultiPL-E)
  • Testing functional correctness with unit tests (pass@k)
  • Benchmarking for BigCode/HuggingFace leaderboards
  • Evaluating fill-in-the-middle (FIM) capabilities

Use alternatives instead:

  • lm-evaluation-harness: General LLM benchmarks (MMLU, GSM8K, HellaSwag)
  • EvalPlus: Stricter HumanEval+/MBPP+ with more test cases
  • SWE-bench: Real-world GitHub issue resolution
  • LiveCodeBench: Contamination-free, continuously updated problems
  • CodeXGLUE: Code understanding tasks (clone detection, defect prediction)

Supported Benchmarks

BenchmarkProblemsLanguagesMetricUse Case
HumanEval164Pythonpass@kStandard code completion
HumanEval+164Pythonpass@kStricter evaluation (80× tests)
MBPP500Pythonpass@kEntry-level problems
MBPP+399Pythonpass@kStricter evaluation (35× tests)
MultiPL-E164×1818 languagespass@kMulti-language evaluation
APPS10,000Pythonpass@kCompetition-level
DS-10001,000Pythonpass@kData science (pandas, numpy, etc.)
HumanEvalPack164×3×66 languagespass@kSynthesis/fix/explain
Mercury1,889PythonEfficiencyComputational efficiency

Common Issues

Issue: Different results than reported in papers

Check these factors:

bash
# 1. Verify n_samples (need 200 for accurate pass@k)
--n_samples 200

# 2. Check temperature (0.2 for greedy-ish, 0.8 for sampling)
--temperature 0.8

# 3. Verify task name matches exactly
--tasks humaneval  # Not "human_eval" or "HumanEval"

# 4. Check max_length_generation
--max_length_generation 512  # Increase for longer problems

Issue: CUDA out of memory

bash
# Use quantization
--load_in_8bit
# OR
--load_in_4bit

# Reduce batch size
--batch_size 1

# Set memory limit
--max_memory_per_gpu "20GiB"

Issue: Code execution hangs or times out

Use Docker for safe execution:

bash
# Generate on host (no execution)
--generation_only --save_generations

# Evaluate in Docker
docker run ... --allow_code_execution --load_generations_path ...

Issue: Low scores on instruction models

Ensure proper instruction formatting:

bash
# Use instruction-specific tasks
--tasks instruct-humaneval

# Set instruction tokens for your model
--instruction_tokens "<s>[INST],</s>,[/INST]"

Issue: MultiPL-E language failures

Use the dedicated Docker image:

bash
docker pull ghcr.io/bigcode-project/evaluation-harness-multiple

Command Reference

ArgumentDefaultDescription
--model-HuggingFace model ID or local path
--tasks-Comma-separated task names
--n_samples1Samples per problem (200 for pass@k)
--temperature0.2Sampling temperature
--max_length_generation512Max tokens (prompt + generation)
--batch_size1Batch size per GPU
--allow_code_executionFalseEnable code execution (required)
--generation_onlyFalseGenerate without evaluation
--load_generations_path-Load pre-generated solutions
--save_generationsFalseSave generated code
--metric_output_pathresults.jsonOutput file for metrics
--load_in_8bitFalse8-bit quantization
--load_in_4bitFalse4-bit quantization
--trust_remote_codeFalseAllow custom model code
--precisionfp32Model precision (fp32/fp16/bf16)

Hardware Requirements

Model SizeVRAM (fp16)VRAM (4-bit)Time (HumanEval, n=200)
7B14GB6GB~30 min (A100)
13B26GB10GB~1 hour (A100)
34B68GB20GB~2 hours (A100)

Resources

Bundled files

The model reads these on demand while the skill is loaded. They are exposed as readable files and are never executed.

Frequently asked questions

What does the Evaluating Code Models AI skill do?

Evaluates code generation models across HumanEval, MBPP, MultiPL-E, and 15+ benchmarks with pass@k metrics. Use when benchmarking code models, comparing coding abilities, testing multi-language support, or measuring code generation quality. Industry standard from BigCode Project used by HuggingFace leaderboards.

Why use Evaluating Code Models on TypingMind?

Because you install it once and use it with any model. Evaluating Code Models is plain Markdown rather than provider-specific code, so the same skill runs on GPT-5, Claude, Gemini, Grok, or a local model — and you can switch model mid-chat without it breaking. TypingMind runs on your own API keys, so you pay providers directly instead of a per-seat subscription, and your skills and chats stay in your own storage.

How do I install Evaluating Code Models in TypingMind?

Open Plugins → Skills → Install from GitHub in TypingMind and paste https://github.com/Orchestra-Research/AI-Research-SKILLs/tree/main/11-evaluation/bigcode-evaluation-harness. TypingMind reads its SKILL.md and bundles its files and installs it as a skill you can enable per chat.

Which AI models can use Evaluating Code Models?

Any model you connect in TypingMind. AI skills are plain Markdown instructions rather than provider-specific code, so GPT, Claude, Gemini, Grok, and local models can all load this skill when a request matches it.

How many AI models can I use with Evaluating Code Models?

As many as you like. As long as a model supports skills, you can use Evaluating Code Models with it — GPT, Claude, Gemini, Grok, DeepSeek, Mistral, Llama and more — all on TypingMind with your own API keys.

Is the Evaluating Code Models AI skill free?

Yes. It is published on GitHub by Orchestra-Research under the MIT license. You only pay your own AI provider for the tokens you use.

What are AI skills?

An AI skill is a reusable instruction bundle that teaches an AI model how to do one specific task. It follows the open Agent Skills format: a SKILL.md file with a name and description, plus any scripts, templates or reference files the model may need. The model reads the instructions only when your request matches the skill, so an installed skill costs nothing until it is used.

How are AI skills different from plugins or MCP servers?

A plugin or MCP server gives a model new tools to call — code that runs somewhere and returns a result. An AI skill gives the model knowledge and process instead: how to approach a task, which steps to follow, what good output looks like. Skills are plain Markdown, so they need no server, no API key and no runtime, and they work with any model.

View all

Set up your own AI workspace now

Get notified about new features and future giveaways by subscribing to our newsletter 👇